concrete proof for god?? tot u asking about concrete proof / evidence in law
Originally posted by skythewood:concrete proof ==> i once step into a cement that is still wet. it eventually harden to concrete. my shoe print in the concrete is proof i stepped in the cement
damn...i had the same thinking...
the motive of tis thread is to seel the definition of concrete proof from those who ask for concrete proof for God’s existence…wad do u mean by concrete?
Concrete proof- some form of unchanging evidence that can remove all doubt. Be it God or whatsoever.
Personal concrete proofs. Yes plenty of them.
Public concrete proof. No way.
Easiest way is to make an experiment to attack a pure atheist and a believer with an evil spirit.
The atheist must remain atheist for the whole experiment process period. See which one could got rid of the nuisance.
But then again there is no concrete proof that anyone could control and send an evil spirit.
Both test subjects must not be aware that they are being tested either. Because you cannot test God and God doesn't allow Himself to be tested.
Of course there is concrete proof.
When we cut out a block , bring it back to the lab for a cube crush test , its concrete proof lo.
Originally posted by despondent:the thing is some ppl r nt convinced tat God cannot be proven…they treat God as the things we see ard us…n they reject the idea of faith without noeing tat actually many things we do in life requires faith…tis include simple things like crossing the road…
Smart opinion. :-)
So may I replace the euphemistic word "faith", with some not-so-nice word like "superstition", and thereby conclude that those who converted do so on the basis of superstition? quoted from gohby
hence, if faith can be replaced wif the word "superstition" then do i take it tat it takes "superstition" to cross the road? it takes "superstition" to believe tat u will wake up alive tml? it takes "superstition" to believe tat wadever u see b4 u indeed exist n tat u r not hallucinating???
Proves that are not tainted with personal judegement of outcome or personal inputs.
Proves that are impartial and objective are concrete. And must be subjected to repeatability.
ok...then wads impartiality? wads being objective? again, wads impartial to me may nt be impartial to u...who defines objectivity n impartiality? man himself?