

Dun tell me here also got anti-lampard campaign hor??Originally posted by zocoss:How come all support Gerrard? Why no Lampard supporters here?![]()
Nah... this is a straightforward question that has been asked many times by people all over England... The question is will changing one person in the middle change the team? Could he bring something else different to the setup and make the team more forceful?Originally posted by turbo_drift:Dun tell me here also got anti-lampard campaign hor??
Hmmm.. Well.. Personally i think Lampard playing style isn't really good compare to Gerrard.. I admit that Lampard maybe good at creating chances but i think he's really ain't good enough compare to Gerrard..Originally posted by zocoss:Nah... this is a straightforward question that has been asked many times by people all over England... The question is will changing one person in the middle change the team? Could he bring something else different to the setup and make the team more forceful?
Originally posted by lolxzxz:scholes![]()
![]()
Didn't they did that at the WC... and no one knew whose duty was it to defend or attack at times... I think it would be best to put Gerrard in the middlle so that Lennon can play in his preferred position on the right as well... Lampard... maybe move him to the left or drop him completely if no choice...Originally posted by stellazio:they shud play the both of them in central midfield, and let both of em abandon their defensive duties. meaning giving the both of them license to roam.
nope, at WC gerrard was the one with more defensive duties, thats why u seldom see him bursting infront. and thats why u see lampard getting so many shots.Originally posted by zocoss:Didn't they did that at the WC... and no one knew whose duty was it to defend or attack at times... I think it would be best to put Gerrard in the middlle so that Lennon can play in his preferred position on the right as well... Lampard... maybe move him to the left or drop him completely if no choice...
Yeah precisely... Both of them like to attack but by putting gerrard and lampard in the middle together, they lose the quality of gerrard where it matters. Cos he being an attacking player as he is, sometimes leave his position that's where Hargreaves came into the picture and became the best performer for England. But gerrard couldn't go all out cos lampard was there. So in the end... They got into each others way? And lampard keep shooting blanks...Originally posted by stellazio:nope, at WC gerrard was the one with more defensive duties, thats why u seldom see him bursting infront. and thats why u see lampard getting so many shots.
so anyway since england's left hand side is weak, maybe the left back can sometimes move centralized abit infront as an acting dm.
anyway if u notice the way england play, they always pass to the same player one.![]()
Well, Paul Scholes don't want to play for them anymore or there will be more options...Originally posted by T.Ryousuke:England not only have 2 good midfielder, there r many better than them.
i meant letting them both abandon their defensive duties. meaning they can stomp forward at any chance, without any defensive responsibility.Originally posted by zocoss:Yeah precisely... Both of them like to attack but by putting gerrard and lampard in the middle together, they lose the quality of gerrard where it matters. Cos he being an attacking player as he is, sometimes leave his position that's where Hargreaves came into the picture and became the best performer for England. But gerrard couldn't go all out cos lampard was there. So in the end... They got into each others way? And lampard keep shooting blanks...
Since lampard plays for chelsea on the left, why don't they move him there and let gerrard and lennon have their preferred spot?![]()