A piece of article to share
Where Do Arsenal Go Without Henry?
Graham Lister analysed a few days ago, how Arsenal would fare with or without Henry. Now that the latter possibility is set to come true, Goal.com presents, once again, his analysis of the Gunners' future...
Are they doomed, or is there light at the end of this proverbial tunnal? There are many aspects we must look at before we attempt arriving at a conclusion.
First, we must recall that Arsenal played half of last season with a half-fit Henry, and the other half without him in the side at all, so they have got used to being without him.
In his absence, the quality of their build-up play did not suffer dramatically. The only place they suffered was in the final third, where Henry's goalscoring instincts (and those of another injury victim, Robin van Persie) were sorely missed.
His effectiveness may have been blunted without the guile and craft of Bergkamp and Pires, the drive and passing ability of Vieira and the intelligent running of Freddie Ljungberg, whose latter career has been too frequently punctuated by injuries.
However, that is not a conclusive observation, because Henry was not fit last season, therefore not operating at maximum capacity.
Emmanuel Adebayor, Jeremie Aliadiere and Julio Baptista were all given opportunities in strikers' roles while Henry and van Persie were on the treatment table. None of the three provided a convincing answer.
Adebayor offered promise and worked tirelessly for the team, often making things happen by pursuing seemingly lost causes. Aliadiere (now at Middlesbrough) and Baptista were found wanting either technically or temperamentally.
Thus, with Henry leaving, Arsenal are looking for a goal-poaching 'fox-in-the-box' forward who can feed off scraps as well as provide end-product to Arsenal's often sumptuous approach play. van Persie will be the only really reliable striker, and unless Theo Walcott becomes the new 'Titi', the search will be a long one for Wenger.
Niklas Bendtner, fresh from a successful season-long loan spell with promoted Birmingham City, could offer options as the Dutchman's strike partner. Would that be enough? After the frustrating experiences of last season (epitomised by the games at the Emirates against CSKA Moscow and West Ham, both of which Arsenal utterly dominated without managing to win or even score) most Gooners would say: No, it ain't.
Those fans will interpret the sale of Henry, without the recruitment of a top-rate striker of the Eto'o, Owen, Torres calibre as a replacement, as a sign that Arsenal were tacitly surrendering their top four status, possibly to arch-rivals Spurs.
An exit softened by the purchase of another striker of genuine quality will be sad but still bearable, particularly with Gilberto Silva having led the team admirably in Titi's absence. After all, no one player is bigger than the club, as has been proved repeatedly - though losing a player as influential as Henry could trigger a lengthy 'transition' before the good times returned.
Something else to consider is the effect that would have on the rest of the squad. Would others be tempted to jump ship? Possibly! And would it make Arsenal less attractive a destination to some potential transfer targets? Again, possibly! A Torres, Owen or Eto'o might just think that one extra time now!
The ideal scenario for Arsenal fans would have been be that Henry remained faithful to the sentiments he expressed a year ago and Wenger brought in a couple of world class stars to support him and underline the club's ambitions. That did not happen, and with the construction of the Emirates Stadium having put huge financial strains on the North London club.
As least the 24 million euros can be used, though, ironically, it might not be enough to land a top striker. Even Darren Bent's stock is rising that high! Arsenal have so far been conspicuous by their absence from most of the big transfer stories this close-season, which can give the impression that the club are being left behind by domestic rivals like Manchester United, Chelsea, Liverpool and Spurs.
That could be deceptive, though: the Gunners tend to do their business away from the media spotlight and then announce a new signing as a fait accompli, so there could be some surprises in store. Signings, there will be, for sure, even if not lavish ones!
In conclusion, as a skipper he might not be missed as much. As a striker, again not so much compared to a season in which he hardly played. If a good striker comes in, as one should, even less!
However, in terms of the confidence inspired, in terms of the ambition portrayed, and in terms of sheer branding, the damage will be huge!