Blatter to step up Euro quota bid
-
the problem is wif the national team is their big pride n couldnt get along wif one another as some dislike some due to club difference.Originally posted by iceFatboy:yes, clubs may be impacted, but the future for all ENGLISH or UK footballers, from age 0-18 have a chance to now play professional football.
they now have a better chance if this goes through to play for their favorite clubs, their countries.. what's wrong with that??
We all curse and swear when the national team loses, and we just hate it when we can't do anything.. but with the imports, at least they can be nationalised and play for Singapore. but in UK, they can't..
worse thing, they have to pump money to help other nations' footballers develop and kill off their own footballers hopes and dream of winning the world cup, playing professional football, and playing for the club they supported.
fair??? look at the big picture lah..
one main problem wif england is they welcome foreigners, but yet none of these homeboys daring to go abroad to play for other countries. so they cannot learn when they stick to playing less challenge side.
imo, england ought to send some players to italian or spanish league to learn their skills. even brazilians r playing in european side. -
agreed.. I read that even in England training, they split into clubs when resting..Originally posted by 798:the problem is wif the national team is their big pride n couldnt get along wif one another as some dislike some due to club difference.
one main problem wif england is they welcome foreigners, but yet none of these homeboys daring to go abroad to play for other countries. so they cannot learn when they stick to playing less challenge side.
imo, england ought to send some players to italian or spanish league to learn their skills. even brazilians r playing in european side.
too much ego.. what to do, man are man..
as for going abroad, english players can't survive till to the technicality required, and they often suffer. Till date, I don't think there is one who had the staying power to do well there. maybe beckham..
thus, comes round to the same problem, how to develop youngsters, when the money is spent on foreigners?? and no money flowing into the grass roots..
and no chance for the youngsters to develop..
imagine walcott having the chance like rooney, I bet he may have been the next owen.. instead, when is the last time, you see him play a full match? -
thats why i said 5 may be too little maybe 7 or something. the point is to provide chances to allow the english players to learn and play.Originally posted by 798:but u forgeting about injuries n suspension. take a look at the current man u squad, they sure do not affect by the new bid. but at currently, even their players carrick, hargrevas and neville are injured n we know dat there is no english chaps to replace them.
the new bid will cost the beautiful game to degrade to older day when unknown players r playing.
maybe they should impose the new bid slowly n apply to Division 1 and FA cup competitions first.
It would be abit unlikely to say you cannot find 4 england players to fill up other positions even if the mid fielders cannot? and in such a case as you mentioned then special allowances can be obtained. -
actually last time england players have Gascoigne, Ince, Sharpe, and others who done well in abroad. the problem wif some players like owen not doing well there is mainly he chose the wrong club like RM (Raul is untouchable n there's no way owen is better than Ronaldo).Originally posted by iceFatboy:agreed.. I read that even in England training, they split into clubs when resting..
too much ego.. what to do, man are man..
as for going abroad, english players can't survive till to the technicality required, and they often suffer. Till date, I don't think there is one who had the staying power to do well there. maybe beckham..
thus, comes round to the same problem, how to develop youngsters, when the money is spent on foreigners?? and no money flowing into the grass roots..
and no chance for the youngsters to develop..
imagine walcott having the chance like rooney, I bet he may have been the next owen.. instead, when is the last time, you see him play a full match?
as for Walcott, he is not the only one who face this problem for getting selected. the only chance dat young players to shine is playing for minor cups n B team soccers. gone are the days liverpool cultivate players like owen and fowler. these days most big clubs rather spending money for quality players than to cultivate local homebred. -
Actually, this rule don't just involved England... It also involve Spain... Looking at the present Barce and Real squad... How many are actually from that country?
For Barce... their first team already have so many foreigners...
Gianluca Zambrotta
Rafael Marquez
Thuram
Deco
Yaya Toure
Ludovic Giuly
Samuel Eto'o
Ronaldinho
Henry
Messi
And even their subs...
Gudjohnsen
Sylvinho
How about Real?
Cannavaro
Gabriel Heinze
Christoph Metzelder
Diarra
Robben
Wesley Sneijder
Robinho
Ruud van Nistelrooy
and their subs...
Royston Drenthe
Baptista
Saviola
Fernando Gago
Jerzy Dudek
To be fair, its still hard to say what can happen if this becomes a rule... But i think it will be good for England and Spain... Some think that it may effect Tv coverage... But i don't think it will cos it could actually make the league more competitive and also possibly make transfer fee lower than they are right now. -
*Volz slams Blatter proposal*
Moritz Volz has hit back at Sepp Blatter's proposed plan to limit the number of foreign players in the Premier League.
The Fifa president wants to see more home-grown players in domestic leagues and is keen to push through a rule which would allow clubs to select only five overseas players in their starting XI.
But Fulham utility player Volz, who left Germany as a 16-year-old to join Arsenal, believes the scheme would simply harm the Premier League.
Cosmopolitan
He told The Times: "In my view it's the Premier League that would suffer most, setting it back years.
"I believe the foreign influx has done nothing but raise the level of English players and the English game. The Premier League is now a cultural melting pot and that benefits everyone involved.
"And it's the combination of the traditionally English with the foreign that makes it what it is. It's the best league in the world precisely because of this cosmopolitan flavour where different styles mingle against the backdrop of English intensity and atmosphere.
"Reduce any of those elements and the Premier League wouldn't be the same."
Cream
And Volz believes that forcing clubs to have more English players in the first team would actually reduce standards among young players, rather than raise them.
He said: "Raising the quantity of domestic players in each team does not mean raising the quality.
"So it would be easier for English youngsters to break into a first team, but what have gained by that? It doesn't mean the standards have gone up. If anything they will have gone down because the competition is less.
"And football is all about competition - between teams and within them. That's how the cream rises to the top." -
you must be a spurs fanOriginally posted by iceFatboy:yes, clubs may be impacted, but the future for all ENGLISH or UK footballers, from age 0-18 have a chance to now play professional football.
they now have a better chance if this goes through to play for their favorite clubs, their countries.. what's wrong with that??
We all curse and swear when the national team loses, and we just hate it when we can't do anything.. but with the imports, at least they can be nationalised and play for Singapore. but in UK, they can't..
worse thing, they have to pump money to help other nations' footballers develop and kill off their own footballers hopes and dream of winning the world cup, playing professional football, and playing for the club they supported.
fair??? look at the big picture lah..
