Tevez : I don't know where my future lies

• limpper

  17 Apr 09, 18:58

  

   

  Carlos Tevez remains unsettled at Manchester United, it has been revealed.

  The Times says Tévez has expressed his desire to stay at United beyond his present “lease” arrangement, which expires on June 30, but, despite starting three of their past four Barclays Premier League matches, he has been disillusioned at being left out of the starting line-up for the biggest games.

  Discussions between David Gill, the United chief executive, and Kia Joorabchian, head of the companies that own the player’s “economic rights”, began this season, but the two sides have never been close to an agreement.

  United have given consideration to the deal proposed by Joorabchian, which would cost them a further £22 million to acquire the player’s registration in addition to at least £100,000 a week in wages, but Gill believes that there should be room for negotiation.

• omgukilledkenny

  17 Apr 09, 19:01

  Hmm The Times keep recycling stories.

• limpper

  17 Apr 09, 19:03

  no no
  
  is refreshing the news

• omgukilledkenny

  17 Apr 09, 19:05

  Originally posted by limpper:

  no no
  
  is refreshing the news

  They so desperate to sell lol.

  The torres interview about joining other leagues they also republish.

• limpper

  17 Apr 09, 19:20

  no lar, wont sell one
  
  i think saf will try all means to keep tevez

• omgukilledkenny

  17 Apr 09, 19:53

  Originally posted by limpper:

  no lar, wont sell one
  
  i think saf will try all means to keep tevez

  I meant The Times desperate.

• limpper

  17 Apr 09, 20:56

  Chelsea fancy stunning Man Utd with Tevez deal.

   

  Chelsea fancy stunning Manchester United with a move for Carlos Tevez.

  The Telegraph says Chelsea are aware that Tevez has yet to agree a deal to remain at Manchester United, and with his two-year loan arrangement due to expire at the end of this season they are free to open negotiations. Tevez is believed to be resigned to leaving Old Trafford.

  To lure the Argentine Chelsea would have to buy the player from the companies who own him. United currently pay £4 million to Tevez in wages and a £4 million loan fee to his owners. The cost to United to buy him outright is more than £20 million but any new club would have to pay even more.

• Scania N113CRB l0v3r

  17 Apr 09, 22:21

  lolx unsettled? sell him away la he reali a not good striker better sell him back to west ham

• SomebodyInSG

  19 Apr 09, 04:48

  Originally posted by Scania N113CRB l0v3r:

  lolx unsettled? sell him away la he reali a not good striker better sell him back to west ham

  He is good, just that the team doesn't need him and Rooney doing the same things. Between the two, the Englishman is the one who is preferred. It's a matter of team tactics and playing style.

  Even if the club were to sell him, there is the issue of backup. a young Macheda or Danny Wellbeck is not enough. Or do you want to see the chinaman playing? Moreover Tevez is already accustomed to the club, it's not beneficial to have a totally new guy undergo transition again.

  But for his own sake, maybe it's better to move on.

• youyayu

  19 Apr 09, 04:53

  Originally posted by Scania N113CRB l0v3r:

  lolx unsettled? sell him away la he reali a not good striker better sell him back to west ham

  how to sell him back. his not man utd property in the first place.

  come west ham/chelsea i will open both arms

• limpper

  19 Apr 09, 11:26

  he's good