Is she into you?
-
To LMB, I don see any MCP- like comments from him, prolly nt rhat obvious to me. MCP is like ng qibo. Lols. MCPs will not give n take with the opposite sex.
-
Originally posted by maskedangel:
To LMB,
I don see any MCP- like comments from him, prolly nt rhat obvious to me.
MCP is like ng qibo. Lols.
MCPs will not give n take with the opposite sex.
So am i a guy or girl now. Please make up your minds. haha
-
Originally posted by maskedangel:
To LMB,
I don see any MCP- like comments from him, prolly nt rhat obvious to me.
MCP is like ng qibo. Lols.
MCPs will not give n take with the opposite sex.
i agree with LMB.
very VERY MCP. i dunno what kind of give and take you're seeing here.
and for your info, his info does NOT benefit women. at all. in fact, i would advice the guys to not follow anything this idiot TS writes.
-
Originally posted by udontknowme:
i agree with LMB.
very VERY MCP. i dunno what kind of give and take you're seeing here.
and for your info, his info does NOT benefit women. at all. in fact, i would advice the guys to not follow anything this idiot TS writes.
this idiot udontknowme doesn't know what he/she is talking.
my info benefits both man and women. i would advice any guy serious about dating to heed my advice.
-
a relationship is started off as a two-sided thing...but not long later it will turn into a one-sided cos one will definitely give in and sacrifice while the other will live happily in the sacrifice of the other party and soon take it for granted when it happens again..
-
Originally posted by Alezec:
a relationship is started off as a two-sided thing...but not long later it will turn into a one-sided cos one will definitely give in and sacrifice while the other will live happily in the sacrifice of the other party and soon take it for granted when it happens again..
in order to last, it has to be give and take. but most of the time, people will tend to take each other for granted and the relationship will suffer. the key is for men to only get involved with women who are more giving than taking.
-
yup...or else both party will suffer....the guy give too much then when he want smt back in return...the girl gets angry and end of story...
-
Originally posted by Alezec:
yup...or else both party will suffer....the guy give too much then when he want smt back in return...the girl gets angry and end of story...
there is hope for mankind!
-
Originally posted by udontknowme:
i agree with LMB.
very VERY MCP. i dunno what kind of give and take you're seeing here.
and for your info, his info does NOT benefit women. at all. in fact, i would advice the guys to not follow anything this idiot TS writes.
*melodramatic*
Haiz...the men just don't get it
lol
-
Originally posted by littlemissbonkers:
*melodramatic*
Haiz...the men just don't get it
lol
that's why i'm here to get them out of their confusion!
-
My ex broke up with me yesterday.
The amazing thing is she had betrayed my faithfulness in her. I never went out with any girl one on one cos i respect her as my gf and she stated that she doesn't wan me to do it.
She got into contact with this guy during a period of maybe 2 days which she claimed we broke up yet i did not have any idea of. She said she got quite interested in the guy. Then after the 2 days we patched. After that, she went out with this guy one on one.
So do you still think that faith in a person can be repaid by faithfulness? i kind of doubt that. It only makes u vulnerable and also taken advantage of.
What is more surprising is she push all the blame to me saying that i was not there for her everytime she needs me, but she is the one who doesn't wan me to be there or keeps to herself every single shit and no matter wat also won't reveal her inner self. She doesn't wan anyone to know she's attached except close frenz. And she said this is the best thing for me.
Anyone can tell me what would you have done if you were me?
-
wat I meant is - She said it is the best for me when she wanted to break up with me.
I believe that in her it is the best for her as she can be with that guy or can have more guys to choose from.
-
we never need to get it..given the lop sided legal framework....why dun every body get it?
-
Originally posted by SgLoveCop@blogspot:
that's why i'm here to get them out of their confusion!
-
Originally posted by littlemissbonkers:
hello bonkers how is your evening -
Originally posted by Alezec:
My ex broke up with me yesterday.
The amazing thing is she had betrayed my faithfulness in her. I never went out with any girl one on one cos i respect her as my gf and she stated that she doesn't wan me to do it.
She got into contact with this guy during a period of maybe 2 days which she claimed we broke up yet i did not have any idea of. She said she got quite interested in the guy. Then after the 2 days we patched. After that, she went out with this guy one on one.
So do you still think that faith in a person can be repaid by faithfulness? i kind of doubt that. It only makes u vulnerable and also taken advantage of.
What is more surprising is she push all the blame to me saying that i was not there for her everytime she needs me, but she is the one who doesn't wan me to be there or keeps to herself every single shit and no matter wat also won't reveal her inner self. She doesn't wan anyone to know she's attached except close frenz. And she said this is the best thing for me.
Anyone can tell me what would you have done if you were me?
She is definitely in the wrong for dating another guy while in a exclusive relationship with you. She cheated on you behind your back. She is untrustworthy.
When she claimed that during that two days she already broke up with you and you had absolutely no idea, she was lying to justify her sin of cheating. She is a liar.
She push the blame to you to justify her cheating. No guy should ever date this kind of woman. Even if what she about you not being there for her is the truth, it does not justify her to cheat behind your back. If she wants to date another guy, she should break up with you first.
She doesn't want anyone to know she is attached except close friends. Nothing wrong with that. Maybe she is not proud of having you as her boyfriend. Or she has some other reasons.
This woman has no loyalty, no trust, no honesty, no integrity. Any guy who choose not to dump her should shoot himself in the head.
-
Originally posted by Fcukpap:
we never need to get it..given the lop sided legal framework....why dun every body get it?
are you implying not to get married to any woman due to the lop sided legal framework?
even though the legal framework might be lop sided, there is still hope for men. But he has to be very very extra careful what kind of woman he chooses to be with over the long term. And he has to know exactly how to keep the woman in love with him over the long term. otherwise, the lop sided legal framework will be the final nail in the coffin for his 'demise'.
-
i think its better to turn it around to ask how a woman should keep their man...the perception should have been changed by now...
and of course it comes by good....but the odds are high on men and the system or women should do something to improve the situation
-
it's already an established social fact and to see more rise in singles..and divorces...
we cannot ignore the impacts of systems and policies on individuals....
-
Originally posted by Fcukpap:
i think its better to turn it around to ask how a woman should keep their man...the perception should have been changed by now...
and of course it comes by good....but the odds are high on men and the system or women should do something to improve the situation
every good woman will play her part and put in fair share of effort in a relationship. but to bring out the goodness in a good woman, the man needs to know how. but men do not know how.
even if the situation seems to be the lack of good women these days, men can protect themselves by not getting involved with such women. but men lack of knowledge of how to distinguish which women are good or bad for them.
of course the govt has it's part to play when the situation is serious and calls for a change in policies. no doubt about that.
-
General advices (and hordes of positive thinking books/tapes) are aplenty...and they seldom worked...because they lack the specific knowledge of the real issues involved in today's alienated relationships....and digressing further....compounded by social influences (and media has a large part to play in it) that propels much higher modern expectations, on the materialistic side, that is. This is only just part of the social fabric, and the legal regulations and influences are also asserting more on men to fulfill for the other...and that leads to another pressure on men, apart from the uncertain economic situations that directly affect men's resources to fulfill such expectations, which have increased than decreased without equal understanding from women whose rights have been fought via men’s empathy. That gratitude was lost with the phenomenal rise of women.
The positioning of love in the minds are therefore subjected to many social realities and pressures...it could not be aligned without another or the system's understanding and resolutions to make it favourable to sustain i.e. it cannot be solely come from within but from with out as well, and that means the system has a great role to facilitate a balanced outcome than using subsidies or medias to direct at only men to change, adapt, and to be accountable for everyone. Times have changed, that perception should also change for women to contribute an equitable solution for their men officially and to the system...if ever out of love...(but nothing has been done to improve the situation and i really doubt).
Communism was once a great love feast of the people, and actually a good theory...but it could only succeed if ALL adopts it; just one or two country moves towards competition and greed, the rest are affected and follow...and how many lives and loves were lost by that impact?
Since we are all prone to advise, and women has been educated or understanding enough about what love means to them…its time they should put forth more equitable solutions to the system for their men as well than merely expecting men to change. It should work both ways.
I believe the system has been hesitant to make such changes because it is politically sensitive (near election) and women has only been fighting for their own rights….and to prevent love from becoming demised, it is also time for them to fight for their men – if love is ever their noun on scarlet lips.
I doubt women know how to go about helping their men. It just cannot and only men’s part to know…and it cannot be just waiting for govt to help....it also need women to stand up for their men officially..
-
Originally posted by Fcukpap:
General advices (and hordes of positive thinking books/tapes) are aplenty...and they seldom worked...because they lack the specific knowledge of the real issues involved in today's alienated relationships....and digressing further....compounded by social influences (and media has a large part to play in it) that propels much higher modern expectations, on the materialistic side, that is. This is only just part of the social fabric, and the legal regulations and influences are also asserting more on men to fulfill for the other...and that leads to another pressure on men, apart from the uncertain economic situations that directly affect men's resources to fulfill such expectations, which have increased than decreased without equal understanding from women whose rights have been fought via men’s empathy. That gratitude was lost with the phenomenal rise of women.
The positioning of love in the minds are therefore subjected to many social realities and pressures...it could not be aligned without another or the system's understanding and resolutions to make it favourable to sustain i.e. it cannot be solely come from within but from with out as well, and that means the system has a great role to facilitate a balanced outcome than using subsidies or medias to direct at only men to change, adapt, and to be accountable for everyone. Times have changed, that perception should also change for women to contribute an equitable solution for their men officially and to the system...if ever out of love...(but nothing has been done to improve the situation and i really doubt).
Communism was once a great love feast of the people, and actually a good theory...but it could only succeed if ALL adopts it; just one or two country moves towards competition and greed, the rest are affected and follow...and how many lives and loves were lost by that impact?
Since we are all prone to advise, and women has been educated or understanding enough about what love means to them…its time they should put forth more equitable solutions to the system for their men as well than merely expecting men to change. It should work both ways.
I believe the system has been hesitant to make such changes because it is politically sensitive (near election) and women has only been fighting for their own rights….and to prevent love from becoming demised, it is also time for them to fight for their men – if love is ever their noun on scarlet lips.
I doubt women know how to go about helping their men. It just cannot and only men’s part to know…and it cannot be just waiting for govt to help....it also need women to stand up for their men officially..
honestly to expect women to come together collectively to stand up for men is almost impossible in this day and age.
just date good women and keep them in love. that's a much easier solution. if there is love and give and take between a couple, a lot of other issues can be sorted out easily.
-
the topic should also include how women give and take as well...in the era of materialistic culture...not solely on men's part...giving the impression that its lies with the fault of men again finding the wrong women....
human nature does change for the worse though its basic colour remains...love and life is a gamble...dating good women or men is fine if it comes with certification that this is "good"...but the social/ environmental influences are of such great impact that "good" evolves to become "relatively good" ...and in its worst cases, "good" becomes a subjective noun....peer pressure could change a woman's goodness to "self-righteousness"...
The medias has mainly sought men to change their behaviour and mindset to solve relationship problems, with very little or well hidden phrases to appeal to women for change. And most of these editors or producers are, as we are aware, women...giving impression that they are sing medias as a feminist vehicles....
more coverage is needed to tell women how to change for men as well....if it is deemed impossible for them to stay united on helping men (so what women know about men is futile without human action)...we cannot allow it to revert back to men's issues again.... its so easy to take men as a punch bag when it needs 2 (and the system) to resolve....
let us see more from women then and as well...
-
Originally posted by maskedangel:
HAHA!
So what you’re trying to imply is that men are shallow, so looking pretty and revealing flesh is all that needs to be done by women? Is that what you have observed on the internet? Or did the latest movie you caught gave you the idea?
statement is flawed, woman!
Don go around acting like a guy!.
.
Men are shallow, dressing up pretty, sweet makeup, and an innocent look on our face is all that is needed to capture 99.99% of the men out there.Revealing flesh is what shallow men would do if they became ah kuas.
-
Since Men will never ever get what Women wants, I would like to encourage all Men to go seek Money first before they seek Women.
Because once Men have Money, we Women will give them what they want even before they know what they want.