they are the same. Long duration no matter how sloooow you do equals some distance.Originally posted by ~Lyn~:so not so much of the distance? juz the duration?
juz toning the legs.. dun wish to build up muscles.. very bulky feeling..Originally posted by j6sus:they are the same. Long duration no matter how sloooow you do equals some distance.
Are you building up, sliming down or just toning your legs?
Long dist run helps to build up stamina and burn fats and build some muscles at the sametime. Of coz it does not help to build up BIG muscles like those bodybuilders or sprinters. Sprinting and long dist. running and bodybuilding, they are all totally different people and different athletes. Most long dist. runners are slim and tall build and they don't really have that so much fats, whereas for sprinters they tend to have those muscular and tight legs specially for sprinting only.Originally posted by ~Lyn~:which of the above will help to tone the legs instead of building up muscles? Or any other ways to tone up leg muscles?
wat i see my frens did for training is they tie weights with a rope round their waist and they try sprinting across the grass field. did a few rounds.. think that one buid up the leg muscles..Originally posted by CSpencer:hey um im a novice sprinter...i go to the gym to build up my upper body only..
um can give example of doing what then can build up muscles for sprinting only?
shouldnt the weights go around the legs rather than the waist? anyway does not have to be sprinting - doing distance or resistance (say, slope) running with weights should also do the trick?Originally posted by ~Lyn~:wat i see my frens did for training is they tie weights with a rope round their waist and they try sprinting across the grass field. did a few rounds.. think that one buid up the leg muscles..
oh i wasnt refering to sprinting per se, but development of one's endurance and strength for running in general. anyway many sports shops do sell weights that are meant to be attached around one's thighs or calfs. think that should be better than makeshift weights tied around one's waist. of course one can also simply carry a weighted bag to run. but i guess weights on the legs would ensure that more effort comes from the legs and hence the development is focused on them.Originally posted by gentlerock:Er.....I think we have to remember that sprinting also involves muscles of the whole body (eg. arm and shoulder muscles for propelling the legs, tummy muscles need to be tensed, etc.).
Its very different from a slow, long run (which works mainly the legs, lungs and heart)...and the rest of the body is much more relaxed than during a sprint. For this reason, I feel that long distance running may have its limitations in improving sprinting abilities.
I suppose that any resistance to movement will create further strength. So perhaps the purpose of tying weights around the waists was to "weigh down" the person to train the legs to move something heavier.
Since running up a slope is also adding resistance by "weighing one down" (instead of using added weights around the waist, the runner is now using gravity). So I guess it does help in sprinting abilities.
Actually, I would rather recommend running upslope than tying weights around the waist (because if you have weights around your waist and fall/twist your body wrongly....you may get injuries like slipped discs, etc. Also, that rope around your waist would probably cause some rope burns, or at the least, scrape/tear some shirts).
Originally posted by gentlerock:Hey, of course there is an upper limit! Or else with sufficient training, we'd all be able to run 2.4 km in one second, which we know is impossible! The limitations are natural - we are two legged creatures, our muscles can only contract so much/fast, etc. It also depends on body condition....a body which is conditioned to be fast can move faster. And there are some people who are just born with fast muscles/body types too.
im certainly not expecting to be able to complete 2.4 in one second! anyway when would we know that we have reached that limit? i mean some guys can run 2.4 in like 8 mins, but for the rest of us, either it takes too enormous an effort to achieve that, or we simply cant achieve that at all. how do we know?
Again, of course there is a limit. To put it simply....when we move our bodies, we burn the energies stored inside us. When this spare energy completely runs out, we die (like a car which has no more fuel). At the same time, we also lose fluids, etc through sweat. We need to replenish all these losses in energy and fluids, etc.
Don't forget that you also need to eat, drink, sleep, go to the toilet, socialise, love, etc. These are all necessary in life! So even if your body can run forever, your mind will be so unhappy it will boycott and stop your body.
ok.. distance may not be a good question. anyway again im more interested in limitations imposed by our physiology rather than what we put inside.
how should one deal with general knee pains and discomforts from frequent running? strangely, i do not usually experience pains in the knee while running, but only during normal walking and swimming. can such discomfort be safely ignored?
Good grief, NO!!! Knee pains (or funny "lose" feelings) are a sign that there is something very wrong and if you have them, please stop till the pain goes completely away....then rest a while more and GRADUALLY start up again. May take days or weeks, depending. Meanwhile, you can swim (no stress on knees), as an alternative exercise. You may want to know that its often not possible to fully repair a damaged knee, so you'd want to take care of it. Some problems will show up only in your middle-to-old age. If you're young, you may thing that its far away...but I promise you, the time WILL come. And you will regret.
btw, i do get funny feelings on my knee when i swim frog style (i cant even say breaststroke???).
hm.. other than ankle weights, there are weights for the thighs and calfs rite? always wanted to try them but never actually got into it. so what i do now is to run in vest and slack instead. the boots can be quite a weight.Originally posted by gentlerock:Yes, I see what you mean now. Yes, I suppose targetting specific muscles using equipment (eg. leg weights) will definitely encourage more specific development in that area.
Digressing a bit......speaking about ankle weights, I had two sets before. After constant usage, I found that they brought out the veins in my legs too much (was afraid of painful vericose veins, like the rickshaw pullers of years ago). Maybe I chose those which were too heavy. Would recommend starting with light ones first (if available) if one chooses to use ankle weights.
the weights i'm referring to are not those used by most bball players or netball players.. not those that strapround ur ankles.. but wat i meant is those weights in the gym( those round black iron disc) .. if i dun remember wrongly my friend tied at least 20kg wif a rope round the waist.. slowly the weights will increase..and when she do a few drills wif that, she's not only stimulating the sprint she'll be doing, she's also training her muscles.. so ultimately her speed increase when she sprint without the weights..Originally posted by wuming78:shouldnt the weights go around the legs rather than the waist? anyway does not have to be sprinting - doing distance or resistance (say, slope) running with weights should also do the trick?