which oNe do U prefEr - adIdAs or nIKe
-
reebok
-
Nike because its all about style for me. The Lebron James II original black and red version, the nike SB range which include those rare dunks, various editions of the air max, air force one's, original silver and red shox, and many, many more.
Although I do like the concept of the new adidas shoe. But too pricey at the moment. Adidas shoes in general look samey samey. They rely too much on marketing solely on one shoe which is the turtle toe, especially for the 35th anniversary shoe range. Whereas nike focus their marketing on a wider cross section of the market which I feel allows more creativity, expression and expansion. -
just do it....
nike -
adidas for apparels n sneakers.Nilke for sports shoes
-
Nike! I'm so sick of the 3 stripes although thats their logo lah. Nike is simple yet nice. Their latest series have nice, funky colours also! As for quality, it depends. Those made in indonesia and thailand not that good. Rather, made in China and Vietnam very good. Esp the vietnam ones, last long.
-
LOL.Originally posted by I_am_PeTe_Parker:Like that you can really feel the air...the nike air at your feet
. -
still prefer adidas
-
erm i have both..lol..onli for casual wear do i wear nike.my nike dunks and anti racism wristband..lol..sportswear adidas including boots,st soccer shoe etc.but i do have a nike shorts and shirts from both brands..lol..so in the middle la no real preference.
-
Reebok for me.
-
adidas shoes are good
and i find the workout attires more durable -
Best of course would be asics for running performance...most ppl here seem to go for style and popularity of Nike and Adidas...
-
soccer boots: adidas (predator)
basket ball: adidas (forgot liao)
casual: adidas (3 stripes)
jogging: adidas. (clima cool)
soccer gloves: adidas/umbro/unisports
jerseys: umbro/adidas -
nike for me...i find their running shoes fit me better, gives better support and looks more stylish than adidas...
-
i like teva n salomon shoes , how come no one talk abt it ???
-
both also can. both got stlye. Most of the time, i see which one cheaper then buy lor
-
I have no preference... just that different brands have different areas that they're strong in...
Nike - Very nice apparel, shoe design only average
Adidas - Very nice shoe design (esp. soccer boots), average apparel design
Asics - Optimal shoes for running with it's GEL cushion, apparel design sucks
New Balance - Overpriced for it's worth, average apparel/shoe design, otherwise fine
Teva - Great water shoes and sandals... Impressive durability, but limited design
Tips: when buying shoes, especially those for serious usage, try not to buy those that are of discounted price and that on display. These are usually off-season shoes, there's a higher chances that the glue on the soles are less sticky and shoes may not last as long... -
Adidas! Nike's over-rated.
-
Sauconi shoes best for running
-
Adidas originals are cool
-
For tops, i prefer Nike, I find their slightly higher end apparel to be comfy with nice designs... their pricing is a bit high though.
-
For me,it will be adidas....Adidas is a consumer brand while nike is a commercial brand
-
+1Originally posted by undead_acer:For me,it will be adidas....Adidas is a consumer brand while nike is a commercial brand -
depends. nike for performance adidas for durability. from wad i see, nike uses lighter materials therefore wears and tears more easily. but adidas uses better materials which last longer but the shoe is basically more heavier than nike thus reduces performance.
-
adidas of cos
it last longer then NIKE cos it hand stitch and glue wif it.... -
adidas of cos
it last longer then NIKE cos it hand stitch and glue wif it....