liverpool fans are just using the champions league win to cover up their disappointment in not winning the premiership.Originally posted by JusStatic:Actually from the way the season has gone so far, if Abramovic didnt support Chelsea, the title is going back to Man Utd again, Arsenal is stuttering (no vieira no henry), Liverpool still needs time (may be they can win it, but certainly their last few games isnt convincing enough though), newcaslte needs to be more balance and consistent, tottenham may be can surprise a few ppl and can even challedge for top 4, but certaining it would take more to win the title, carlton , wigan and those teams may not last the pace.
From a neutral point of view, at least we won't get to see either Man Utd or Arsenal win the title again. One think i can't understand people mentality is that Chelsea only won one title after 50 years and people are already complaining its bad for the english game and that this second title is already in the bag, and epl become more boring becoz no competition anymore blah blah.
COME ON, they have only won one title so far and people are already bitching around, WHAT about that time MAN UTD won 4 in a row, well i guess those bitching comes from those glory hunters of man utd, arsenal and liverpool.
What? you said chelsea will surely win and dominate EPL for the next couple of years or as long as abra is around? WELL WAIT TILL THAT DAY COMES THEN YOU START BITCHING.
WHAT? you can't stand those ARROGANT CHELSEA FANS? ARE YOU TELLING ME Man Utd 's players and FANS are not arrogant during the glory 1999 ? or when they won 4 titles in a row? ARE you telling me SOME SECTION OF the arsenal fans are not arrogant when they go 49 games unbeaten? ARE you telling me NO , NOT A SINGLE LIVERPOOL fan is arrogant when they won the champions leauge?
Come on man, arrogance is always arround, take it or leave it.
Note: I am no Chelsea fan, but i come in contact with alot of chelsea haters and that is starting to piss me off, give credit when its due people. They may not have a history like Man Utd or Liverpool, but in terms of the current suiation, they are the best in England whether you like it or not. And please dont start with the money crap things.
Originally posted by JusStatic:
Hmm you may say that season, Porto won the CL becoz all the big teams like Man Utd, Milan, Real, Barcelona, Juve didnt perform. I THOUGHT MONEY CAN BRING U SUCCESS? THOSE CLUBS GOT THE MONEY, where is the success that season? Porto lucky that season? Hmm how come Man Utd, Milan, Real, Barcelona not lucky?
Technically Porto were lucky, because in the 2nd round of the UCL that year, Porto VS Man Utd, the referee wrongly ruled out United's 2nd goal for offside. But I'd give it to Porto because every successful team needs an element of luck.
Originally posted by HafizulKMS:
Then wait until then you come here and talk about it. Now this assumption is still too far to be realistic. VERY FAR INDEED!
BUT, if you want to worry about which club will have such problem first, like financial problem, or even bankrupt and etc. Then you should be worried for MAN U. They really fuk up this time. The stupid businessman bought over the club, and he is in serious debt, and the crying babies fans DONÂ’T support their own club by not buying their club junks (jersey, and etc).
The last I saw, Old Trafford was filled to capacity with fans wearing the red shirts. I suppose they picked them up from the street or made their own shirts, according to your logic.
PLUS, they are not winning any trophy at the moment! The owner must be jumping in the hot water like sh!t now.
No club is winning any trophy at the moment because the season is not even half over.
Man U financial problem is very obvious by looking at the recent transfers, they are really limited by available funds.
Not having spent a lot of money does not signify that a club has no money to spend. Similarly, spending a lot of money does not indicate that a club has a lot of money left in the bank.
Who fuk up? Man U lah!
Originally posted by tombadgerlock:
The last I saw, Old Trafford was filled to capacity with fans wearing the red shirts. I suppose they picked them up from the street or made their own shirts, according to your logic.
Originally posted by tombadgerlock:
No club is winning any trophy at the moment because the season is not even half over.
Originally posted by tombadgerlock:
Not having spent a lot of money does not signify that a club has no money to spend. Similarly, spending a lot of money does not indicate that a club has a lot of money left in the bank.
Who cares about Man United? I'm no fan of Red devils.Originally posted by HafizulKMS:Then wait until then you come here and talk about it. Now this assumption is still too far to be realistic. VERY FAR INDEED!
BUT, if you want to worry about which club will have such problem first, like financial problem, or even bankrupt and etc. Then you should be worried for MAN U. They really fuk up this time. The stupid businessman bought over the club, and he is in serious debt, and the crying babies fans DONÂ’T support their own club by not buying their club junks (jersey, and etc).
PLUS, they are not winning any trophy at the moment! The owner must be jumping in the hot water like sh!t now.
Man U financial problem is very obvious by looking at the recent transfers, they are really limited by available funds.
Who fuk up? Man U lah!
Chelsea will not go bankrupt overnight, but if the wages goes in the red over money earned, they will.Originally posted by HafizulKMS:Oh yeah, if you are comparing the commercial values, Chelsea will catch up with Man U, or even Real Madrid very soon. Just see the number of sponsor deals they sign recently, they are making money, in fact.
Think about it, investment is about, you spent, and you generate profits. Chelsea just started, why so worry about bankrupt or dept?
Abu have the brain too, you think he is really a plain stupid idiot like some of the coconuts here, who only know Chelsea will bankrupt after they spent a lots?
Hmm how come I don't see or hear people complain when Man Utd won 3 titles in a row and dominate the EPL during the mid-ninties?Originally posted by Pitot:Well, maybe the other teams should boycott chelsea and set up another league.. lol
Yeah fat hope..![]()
Originally posted by tombadgerlock:Lets check, their sales is suxx compare to the pass few years. Their report statement shows that clearly. May be you should change a doctor for your eyes? Or you never open?
As a matter of fact, I did have my eyesight checked recently as I was buying a new pair of spectacles. It's fine, thanks for your concern. I do wonder how you can assume their jerseys were bought a few seasons back. You mean you have the statistics of all the United jerseys sold for the past few years? Unless you can back up your claim with real facts and figures, please refrain from even posting anything.


Originally posted by tombadgerlock:Yeah, this Man U thropies are pass = HISTORY. You reminding me Nort. Forest, they won quite a lots of throphies also, but now...? Man U will be the next.
Oh, for 'at the moment', you meant LAST SEASON. Of course at the moment United have no trophies. No one can deny that. Although, I wish to point out to you, overall United have more trophies and more pedigree than Chelsea. It's going to take a long time before Chelsea even goes some way to matching that.
Originally posted by tombadgerlock:Edwin van der Sar and Park Ji Sung? Cheap papaya. Shows that they are really lack of fund, obviously. Very weak balance sheet,
The club have bought Edwin van der Sar and Park Ji Sung for this season, both of whom have proved rather useful so far. They may not be great players in the mould of Zidane, Shevchenko or Henry, but then I don't see Frank Lampard superseding Zidane nor do I think Drogba is ever going to be held in as high esteem as a Shevchenko or a Henry.
Fact is, Chelsea's money has inflated the prices for Drogba, Essien, Wright-Phillips. These players were bought far above their true market value. The price of a player is not the surest way to indicate his greatness.
While transfer funds for Manchester United will be rather limited for the foreseeable future, there has been word that a certain sum will be available every season for the manager to spend as he sees fit.
wigan's owner is quite rich too you know?Originally posted by F.raon.I.R:Be4 reading this thread,my hatred for chelsea is juz rougly 50%,BUt....after reading the farker(HafizulKMS)comments,a hypocrite.i think he only support chelsea only when that russian bastard took over chelsea....
Lets hope he grew sick of chelsea,then chelsea will demise..becoz of all the wages.debts.And he may buy wigan and create a dynasty out of it.Next time u may see HafizulKMS shouting GLORY GLORY WIGAN!!blablabla all the crap n shit.