Thanks to Man U! For shutting their fans mouth!!!!
-
I believe all non-Chelski fans can see clearly that Money did a play an integral part in Chelski success..
but then again.. Chelski fans prefer to turn a blind eye to that and claim that team spirit won the title for them.. absolute bollocks..
You trying to tell me that Drogba , Crespo , Makelele , Joe Cole , Frank Lampard and almost whole of the squad.. came for nothing ?
Of course not ... cast ur eyes back to 3 or 4 seasons ago.. under Ken Bates.. without money.. did chelski win anything ? i can onli remember a FA cup or 2 ..
Of course , other teams spend $$ too.. Man Utd spent the biggest lot (pre-Abramovich era).. we didn't say that united won the champions league and EPL becos of their team spirit and rubbish.. $$ did play a big big part..
Speaking abt Real Madrid.. i personally dun think Chelski has any rights to question their achievements.. Real is the MOST successful club in European history..
Jose Mourinho is a good manager.. but without Roman Abramovich bankrolling those transfers.. do u really think that they will be what they r today ? Be realistic my fellow forumites...
my 2 cents
-
football is of course about money.
without money you wont get the best players.
chelsea is certainly not the only club that depended on money to get players. the important thing whether they won anything.
see how much newcastle has spent.
they have really not won a single thing. -
let that wakaka asshole rant for all he like.....he will have his karma
-
Without the tons of money will Chelsea get good players in the first place? If Chelsea were as before can they splurge on players like Essien and SWP? I highly doubt so.If Chelsea had not been waving their cash at these 2 players' clubs, i believe that Essien wud go to man u and SWP will end up in Arsenal.But they didn.Becoz Chelsea offered a pirce that other clubs cannot match.sure other clubs lyk man u also spent.Liverpool spent.But did they approach the 300 million mark in a mere 2 seasons?Originally posted by nanren4ever:Give credit when it is due. Chelsea won last season because they were a group of good footballers who were able to click as a team, and play as a team. -
Are you guys trying to say Chelsea spent most to get the BEST players in the world?
Does that mean all players Chelsea has are best in the WORLD? So does that mean SWP is much much BETTER than Nistelroy/Rooney and etc.?
But if Rooney is better than Drogba, does that mean Man U also spending lots to buy the BEST OF THE BEST, but only can win NUTS?
So if Chelsea can spent money for EVERY BEST players in the world, does they already got Stevie and Joaquin?
Use you common sense la. Anyway, whenever Man U fans tell me, Chelsea won is because they spent, then how about Man U, they won is not because they spent? Really made me feel like they are sore losers.
Wakakakakaka~~~ so? -
Originally posted by HafizulKMS:
Wakakakakakaka
Are you guys trying to say Chelsea spent most to get the [b]BEST players in the world?
Does that mean all players Chelsea has are best in the WORLD? So does that mean SWP is much much BETTER than Nistelroy/Rooney and etc.?
But if Rooney is better than Drogba, does that mean Man U also spending lots to buy the BEST OF THE BEST, but only can win NUTS?
So if Chelsea can spent money for EVERY BEST players in the world, does they already got Stevie and Joaquin?
Use you common sense la. Anyway, whenever Man U fans tell me, Chelsea won is because they spent, then how about Man U, they won is not because they spent? Really made me feel like they are sore losers.
Wakakakakaka~~~ so?[/b]
Even with the money, Your Chelsea is still unable to buy the European championship
Like i was saying, till they win the UC throphy, Chelsea is nothing compared to Mighty Reds. -
Originally posted by Shigemichi Take:
i disagree with you.
[b]Wakakakakakaka
Even with the money, Yous Chealse is still unable to buy the European championship
Like i was saying, till they win the UC throphy, Chelsea is nothing compared to Mighty Reds.[/b]
to any club winning the domestic title is the most important thing. -
roman spent over a 100 million pounds EACH season for the first 2 seasons since he bought chelsea.Originally posted by HafizulKMS:Good good. People keep saying Chelsea won is because they spent alots. This kind of silly things have been saying again and again. I also lazy to talk about the "money-topic" anymore. All other clubs spent a lots also what, how come they cannot win? That's because they are not good enough. Chelsea won is because they are GOOD! This kind of things, common sense also can tell la. But those Man U monkeys really no common sense, keep on saying Chelsea won is because they spent. Then how come Man U won nuts after the spent alots too?
tell me any club that has spent that much in 1 season and i will shut up -
Before I say something here, I have to clarity I am not trying to offend Liverpool fans. I admit that Liverpool is good.
But the EPL title is what Liverpool missing for decades, and that's only medal that Stevie's cabinet lack of. EPL title is as important as Champions League, depending on you look at it at which perspective.
Regarding spending over 100m for the pass two season, come on, use your common sense. Don't tell me you bought a super players 10 or 5 years back with 1m, now you still expect to get super players with that amount?
I remember i buy sweet few years back, I can get 10 sweet with 10 cents, nowadays 10 cents I can only buy nuts. It's call inflation! Oh my god. -
manutd won ....the $ factor only played a small part..when manutd's era of winning trophies,they won with a core of home grown players.Look at beckham,giggs neville brothers,scholes,butt,brown.....u mean manutd BUY THEM WITH MILLIONS?!....the academy trained them,they rose thru the ranks n won the lot.
Look at ur chelsea ,tell me how many r home grown?i can only say ur captain terry is.others?cole?frm west ham,lampard?westham again...so dun deny the fact that $ played a great part of chelsea's success. -
We noe lots of clubs also spent alot, but u got to admit that Chelsea is the club that spoilt the transfer market. They are like carrot head. Chop n Chop n Chop.
-
$$ has played a part in all clubs success or demise..
It has definitely played a part in Man Utd's success...
but no doubt, it plays a huge huge part in Chelski's success..
Without Mourinho, Chelski might still win the Premier League..
But without Abramovich's money, Chelski definitely will not win the EPL or even get close...
That's a fact and all that i would say.. Thanks .. -
talking bout flops. man utd bought taibi, veron, djemba djemba, kleberson...
-
thats because liver has g. houllier. now benny is betterOriginally posted by HafizulKMS:Before I say something here, I have to clarity I am not trying to offend Liverpool fans. I admit that Liverpool is good.
But the EPL title is what Liverpool missing for decades, and that's only medal that Stevie's cabinet lack of. EPL title is as important as Champions League, depending on you look at it at which perspective.
Regarding spending over 100m for the pass two season, come on, use your common sense. Don't tell me you bought a super players 10 or 5 years back with 1m, now you still expect to get super players with that amount?
I remember i buy sweet few years back, I can get 10 sweet with 10 cents, nowadays 10 cents I can only buy nuts. It's call inflation! Oh my god. -
not only that.. Forlan , Silvestre (to a certain extent) , Liam Miller , Tim Howard (form dipped badly after great start) .. just to name a few..Originally posted by anhydrouscoppersulphate:talking bout flops. man utd bought taibi, veron, djemba djemba, kleberson...
sometimes.. it is nice to haf a chuckle on the flops that we signed.. -
i personally also think that Rafael Benitez has been brilliant to say the least..Originally posted by anhydrouscoppersulphate:thats because liver has g. houllier. now benny is better
A master tactican with a gentleman's manners... he's doing wonders for Liverpool and English football as a whole...
P.S. Gerrard has been absolutely on-fire for the past few wks..
-
i think forlan n silvestre not bad.Originally posted by Jeno:not only that.. Forlan , Silvestre (to a certain extent) , Liam Miller , Tim Howard (form dipped badly after great start) .. just to name a few..
sometimes.. it is nice to haf a chuckle on the flops that we signed.. -
at least better than moan-rinhoOriginally posted by Jeno:i personally also think that Rafael Benitez has been brilliant to say the least..
A master tactican with a gentleman's manners... he's doing wonders for Liverpool and English football as a whole...
P.S. Gerrard has been absolutely on-fire for the past few wks.. -
it is a fact that money is the main driving force in building any team. it is just a matter of how much each team spent and how much they have won.
it is a fact that man u is the most successful team since the inception of the EPL.
it is a fact that liverpool has not won a single premiership title, CL is a good consolation to them.
it is a fact that RA has spoilt the whole transfer market and salary range.
it is a fact that winning the domestic title is the most important of all. it shows the depth of a squad and its consistency.
it is a fact that newcastle is the worst team in terms of achievement, considering the amount they spent against what the won, which is nothing at all. -
it is a fact that these are historyOriginally posted by dragg:it is a fact that man u is the most successful team since the inception of the EPL.
it is a fact that liverpool has not won a single premiership title, CL is a good consolation to them. -
my opinion of forlan is that .. he was pretty poor at Man Utd... onli during the last season, he began to hit some form..Originally posted by anhydrouscoppersulphate:i think forlan n silvestre not bad.
his approach play wasn't that good.. often running around liked a headless chicken.. but he do pack a powerful shot..
As for Silvestre, his lack of concentration and inability to cut out his errors has been inexcuseable to say the least.. Hopefully the capture of Vidic (if it has been completed) will either shake him up or get rid of him for good..
2 Cents worth -
haha.. any mention of Newcastle will bring back the memories of Lee Bowyer and Kieron Dyer swinging punches at each other.. hahaOriginally posted by dragg:it is a fact that money is the main driving force in building any team. it is just a matter of how much each team spent and how much they have won.
it is a fact that man u is the most successful team since the inception of the EPL.
it is a fact that liverpool has not won a single premiership title, CL is a good consolation to them.
it is a fact that RA has spoilt the whole transfer market and salary range.
it is a fact that winning the domestic title is the most important of all. it shows the depth of a squad and its consistency.
it is a fact that newcastle is the worst team in terms of achievement, considering the amount they spent against what the won, which is nothing at all.
Is that the most memorable moment in the EPL since it started in 1991 or 1992 ? -
so back to the monetary topic again..so if barcelona is gonna win big thingss why don't i see anyone grumbling..all their star players were bought with money too.. yada yada..
and they are united,and also winning things like chelsea unlke madrid..this year they even said henry and lampard are their targets,2 big money moves if it works out..face it,part of the prejudice against chelsea is because or mourinho..had it been rianieri who won the epl,not many people would be so biased against chelsea and the money.. -
i believe that alot of ppl are speaking out against Chelski's success.. due to Mourinho's own claim that they won the title due to team spirit and not due to the money spent...Originally posted by stellazio:so back to the monetary topic again..so if barcelona is gonna win big thingss why don't i see anyone grumbling..all their star players were bought with money too.. yada yada..
and they are united,and also winning things like chelsea unlke madrid..this year they even said henry and lampard are their targets,2 big money moves if it works out..face it,part of the prejudice against chelsea is because or mourinho..had it been rianieri who won the epl,not many people would be so biased against chelsea and the money..
To me, that statement was kinda of bollocks.. -
true.Originally posted by anhydrouscoppersulphate:it is a fact that these are history
history is sweet only to the fans of the club they support. each thinks that their club is the best. but it should be was the best.
the really important point is always who are defending champion is and who will win the current one.
when it comes to EPL, chelsea fans should have the most say. when it comes to the CL, liverpool should have the most say.
BUT it will end the very minute they fail to successfully defend the title.