Soccer - Do money really can buy success?
-
When look at this thread title, many fukers will thought I am talking about how Chelsea bought success with the money they spent, especially those Man U losers.
Man U is really loser!! Tell me, how much they spent? Do they spend less than a non-league club like Burton Albion? If yes then why they donÂ’t win? With their 27m Rooney and superstar Ronaldo playing, why cannot score a goal?
Ok, Man U fukers, come to see your fuking logic:
Chelsea spent more that Man U -> they won the EPL title -> Money do the trick
Man U spent more than Burton -> they cannot beat them -> tell me your fuking Man U logic??
Come on, the money they spent on one Man U player, is equivalent to 10 years total cost for Burton. Money do the trick? Money can buy success? Only Man U losers have this logic, because they are losers, they cannot lose, they jealous and so and so.
Man U SUX! So? -
Man Utd beat Chelski..
so does that mean that Chelski is a poorer team than Man Utd ?
Of course not.. soccer doesn't work this way.. but it seems to me that you are implying that.. -
U shd use Real Madrid as an example, they are the most f*** up team among the big spending teams.Originally posted by HafizulKMS:When look at this thread title, many fukers will thought I am talking about how Chelsea bought success with the money they spent, especially those Man U losers.
Man U is really loser!! Tell me, how much they spent? Do they spend less than a non-league club like Burton Albion? If yes then why they donÂ’t win? With their 27m Rooney and superstar Ronaldo playing, why cannot score a goal?
Ok, Man U fukers, come to see your fuking logic:
Chelsea spent more that Man U -> they won the EPL title -> Money do the trick
Man U spent more than Burton -> they cannot beat them -> tell me your fuking Man U logic??
Come on, the money they spent on one Man U player, is equivalent to 10 years total cost for Burton. Money do the trick? Money can buy success? Only Man U losers have this logic, because they are losers, they cannot lose, they jealous and so and so.
Man U SUX! So?
u shdn't use such an example. if a big team doesn't win anything the whole season, they are f*** up. but if they lose or draw a smaller team sometimes, it's considered slipped up.
Man U spent more than Burton -> they cannot beat them -> tell me your fuking Man U logic??
u cannot say that if team A spend more than team B, then team A must win team B. if not dun have to play liao, every team just compared their spendings and they can straight away take any cup -
i get wad u r trying to say. whenever chelsea wins, people say its cuz they bought their way through...
-
Then why Man U spent such a big sum, but still cannot win the title? Because they sux!!
-
Man U's Ronaldo isn't a superstar, Real Madrid's Ronaldo used to be a superstarOriginally posted by HafizulKMS:With their 27m Rooney and superstar Ronaldo playing, why cannot score a goal? -
Because man utd fans jealous mah, so blame money loh, else what to do? and they are doing so badly. hope they relegated next season.
-
People just don't understand that money can only get u so far, its talent and ability that counts on the football pitch. Look at Read Madrid, they are all just playing for themselves, they believe in the Galaticos tag, and their players do not get along with each other. The spanish players like Pavon, Casillas and Helguera do not mix around with Ronaldo, Cicinho, Robinho, Carlos, Julio Baptista. They are not playing as a team.
Chelsea's success is based on the fact that they are willing to play for the team, and their respect of the coach is 1 major factor. Real Madrid players never really respect their coaches over the years, and see how many have come and go in just 2 seasons. under Mourinho, Chelsea is willing to squad rotate the players, wiling to play as a team, and play according to instructions. That, is what money cannot buy.
Also, look at Bolton and Wigan. Bolton has consistently performed over the years in the EPL, and they don't spent much. Wigan's players are hardworking and run their socks off, and they are now in the top half of the table. So money really isn't everything. -
Well said people, finally there are some who can see that money is not everything in football.
-
Not all the time see real madrid spent how much cash and yet their success and milan and man utd so money is not everything but having money is a having a upper-hand
-
money only helps but it doesn't guarantee success..but what i don't like is the fact that if people harp on chelsea's money and buying,why not barcelona?period.
-
barcelona did buy but did not buy as much as chelsea last year which almost change the whole first team list except for some players
-
Ermm.. why every single Chelski topic must involve $$ ?
Money is not everything .. but it's a biggest factor in Chelski's ability to attract players ..
Players liked Robben , Drogba , Crespo , Carvalho and almost all of the 1st team would not be at Stamford Bridge if not for Abramovich's money..
But of course, every team would love such a sugar daddy.. including Manchester United & Arsenal ...
-
Teams who spend millions in one year and teams who spend millions over a few years all have the same objective, and that is to win trophies (the so call attempt to "buy" the title). Nothing wrong with aiming to achieve things.
No wrong in spending millions and millions over a few seasons in an atempt to create a winning team and no wrong in spending millions in one season in an atempt to win things either. Who wouldnt want to win things? -
the important to know is many teams spent a hell lot of money too but did not achieve the same result.
some won virtually nothing. newcastle is the best example. -
Real also classic example...Originally posted by dragg:the important to know is many teams spent a hell lot of money too but did not achieve the same result.
some won virtually nothing. newcastle is the best example.
-
Money <> success
Money + a good manager = success -
Only if u know how to use the money wisely.
-
real made a lot of money you know.Originally posted by lpx88:Real also classic example... -
Man U is the actual CLASSIC, spent so much and still always not able to beat lousy team.
-
success should not be measured over one game... if burton had chelsea's money, they would be beating teams in premiership and winning it as well... money goes a long way... having said that man u still suck...or should i say their manager squandered the greens on lamersOriginally posted by HafizulKMS:Man U is the actual CLASSIC, spent so much and still always not able to beat lousy team. -
Ok, let see what Man U bought! Wakakakakak~~
-
well, maybe we all should start looking at portsmouth. Some rich russian guy also bought over the club right ? lets see what happens to them will they be another chelsea ?
-
Glazers also freaking rich leh, so? Did they won? Yeah, the pictch too many sand, wakakakakkaka~~
_|_ -
Glazers r not rich wad...they pile debts on Man U...