TS must be a chelscum fanOriginally posted by jianfish9:Nice and prompt Reply![]()
Originally posted by Dead_Man_Inc:why didn't they do so then since they are free to it is their first team keeper and i see no reason why they need to drop tim howard since he is free to play against united
[b]Premier League clear clubs over Howard
The Premier League are satisfied that neither Manchester United nor Everton broke any rules over the transfer of Tim Howard.
The League contacted the clubs to find out exactly why the American goalkeeper did not play in the Premiership match between them at Goodison Park last week.
Howard joined Everton on a season-long loan deal from United last summer, which became a permanent deal in February.
Premier League rules on loan deals prevent players from playing against their host club but, once the Howard deal became permanent, he was eligible to play against United on April 28.
The Premier League would not have sanctioned the permanent transfer if United had requested a clause preventing Howard from playing against them.
But before the match Everton boss David Moyes appeared to suggest there had been a verbal agreement between the clubs over Howard's omission.
However, a statement from the Premier League confirmed: 'At the time of Tim Howard's permanent transfer from Manchester United to Everton, the Premier League ensured there were no agreements in place that contravened our rules.
'As a result of recent comments we had sought further clarification from both clubs and are satisfied that it remains the case that there were no agreements that breached any of our rules.
'Everton were free to play Tim Howard in their fixture against Manchester United had they so wished - and this has been confirmed by both clubs.'
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=428078&cc=4716[/b]
probably had some secret agreement, or everton just didn't know the rules.Originally posted by ghimpheng:why didn't they do so then since they are free to it is their first team keeper and i see no reason why they need to drop tim howard since he is free to play against united
there was a verbal agreement, didnt u read?Originally posted by ghimpheng:why didn't they do so then since they are free to it is their first team keeper and i see no reason why they need to drop tim howard since he is free to play against united
verbal agreement ? and everton stupidly accepted it when they don't even need to keep their promise since it is against the rules and kelong with their 2nd / 3rd choice keeper ? and phil neville own goal ?Originally posted by omgukilledkenny:there was a verbal agreement, didnt u read?
and why didn't they make report just before/after the match? why must wait til few weeks later?Originally posted by ghimpheng:why didn't they do so then since they are free to it is their first team keeper and i see no reason why they need to drop tim howard since he is free to play against united
EXACTLY!Originally posted by jianfish9:Part of the deal I guess. Man Utd could jolly well stuff him in reserve. Its not as though they need that 3mil pounds at all. It was supposed to be a loan till season end and by loan agreement, Howard could not play against Man Utd but Man Utd was kind enough to sell it to them earlier as they requested.
If Everton decided to play Howard, Man Utd could also not do anything about it at all.
But Everton had the Dignity to Honour the deal. Something some do not have.
Doesn't matter anyway. Later if Howard play and Everton lose then some people will then say Howard Kelong.
they need to pay him weekly wages and listen to his whining / rantings / complaints and affect reserves atomsphere or wateverOriginally posted by jianfish9:Part of the deal I guess. Man Utd could jolly well stuff him in reserve. Its not as though they need that 3mil pounds at all. It was supposed to be a loan till season end and by loan agreement, Howard could not play against Man Utd but Man Utd was kind enough to sell it to them earlier as they requested.
If Everton decided to play Howard, Man Utd could also not do anything about it at all.
But Everton had the Dignity to Honour the deal. Something some do not have.
Doesn't matter anyway. Later if Howard play and Everton lose then some people will then say Howard Kelong.
so where you going with this?Originally posted by ghimpheng:they need to pay him weekly wages and listen to his whining / rantings / complaints and affect reserves atomsphere or watever
what nonsense when u said man utd was kind enough to sell it to everton earlier
didn't knew man utd fear Tim Howard so much
Chelscum????Originally posted by felirox:TS must be a chelscum fan![]()