Originally posted by Agenda:I dont think ALL Chelsea fans are bad, just a handful, esp ronaldog and his clones and once in awhile GP.
Actually, I don't feel like arguing with a amateur fan who supported football since 2003 because he needed self assurance hence chose chelski..
Neither do I wanna argue with a kid who gets his factfile from Wikipedia then spice it up some other crap of his own
Or some idiot who discredit other team and keeps contradicting himself, How I wish TNP and ESPN are looking at this.
Then they would stop disgracing themselves by putting on the air or posting your worthless thoughts..
And your arrogance is simply intolerable.. No wonder chelski fans are deemed the biggest bast[b]ards in the world![]()
![]()
[/b]
Originally posted by Agenda:and where do you get your facts from?
And your arrogance is simply intolerable.. No wonder chelski fans are deemed the biggest bast[b]ards in the world![]()
![]()
[/b]
Originally posted by Agenda:Erm i don't wanna get on your case, but from the time you were born till now, i think you're not really eligible to talk on history? because its obvious that during your time, the most successful club would be Man Utd.
hahah..
nice lah, quote him then he change his sentence again lah..
gp, you don't deserve to be a football fan, what makes a club and a fan is the club's glorious past and the fan's pride in the club
thats why people hate you here..
do yourself a favour, disappear from this forum
everything to you is chelsea the best, are you fcuking twat? yes you are.. you failed to their faults, even a die hard liverpool, arsenal and manu fan can tell you their own club's fault..
seriously, with fans like you, no wonder chelsea cannot win liverpool, manu and rm based on fanbase..
chelsea only had more supporters since 2003 because most of them are like you, glory hunting bast[b]ards
but apparently, the chelski trophy room still looks empty![]()
![]()
[/b]
Just ask leedsOriginally posted by stellazio:and where do you get your facts from?
even wikipedia can't help you on this? heck, however much google would love to help you, but this is just your own personal view.![]()
But I've seen the greatest devils play, some of the best of lfc and cfc playOriginally posted by stellazio:Erm i don't wanna get on your case, but from the time you were born till now, i think you're not really eligible to talk on history? because its obvious that during your time, the most successful club would be Man Utd.
wheres arsenal =DOriginally posted by Agenda:But I've seen the greatest devils play, some of the best of lfc and cfc play
that mean u must have add personal inside your postOriginally posted by xXxSIPxXx:Jesus,i got banned in that stupid Stomp coz i blasted you in a similar thread.
So i will keep it simple this time!
YOUR ARMPIT AND MOUTH SO SMELLY UNTIL TOA PAYOH LOR 7 ALSO CAN SMELL!
Originally posted by Agenda:I don't think there is a problem with when he started supporting Chelsea. Neither is there anything wrong with supporting Chelsea in itself. The issue is how one shows 'support' for another club that is more of the problem. Especially when you spend more time and effort hating another club than 'supporting' your own club.
Actually, I don't feel like arguing with a amateur fan who supported football since 2003 because he needed self assurance hence chose chelski..
Neither do I wanna argue with a kid who gets his factfile from Wikipedia then spice it up some other crap of his own
Or some idiot who discredit other team and keeps contradicting himself, How I wish TNP and ESPN are looking at this.
Then they would stop disgracing themselves by putting on the air or posting your worthless thoughts..
And your arrogance is simply intolerable.. No wonder chelski fans are deemed the biggest bast[b]ards in the world![]()
![]()
[/b]
agenda would still be the same if roman went to man uOriginally posted by Master -_-:the whole scenario would be different if Roman came to Man U/Arsenal/Liverpool![]()
![]()
*Clap Clap..Originally posted by reyes:man utd are still man utd. they will be upthere in the title chase.
by the way, i am arsenal fans.
in the last year premiership, i actually hope man utd could spoilt the chelsea party and they did coz arsenal are out of it so early in the season.
but this year, man utd spent heaps of money on tevez, nani, anderson, hargreaves.
maybe it the jealousy that arsenal could not compete withs billionaire clubs.
but i sincerely hope that liverpool, arsenal, chelsea and man utd could fight all the way to the last game to be crown premiership champion.
let make soccer friends not enemy.
it sound quite ridiculous that you guys are fighting over someone that you dont know personally, and they dont even know about it.
afterall it is dub as the " beautiful Game".
let not spoilt the spirit of this game.
fully agreed that things will indeed be very much different if he is not aorund to throw his money but IMHO his involvement does makes things alot more exciting, look at the level of football being played today be it in ECL or EPL and also the willingness to bring in "big" players or "big" players coming to EPL does increased as well, so its not all bad there.Originally posted by Master -_-:the whole scenario would be different if Roman came to Man U/Arsenal/Liverpool![]()
![]()
to be fair, Chelsea does buy their fair share of youngster just that at the same time they brought lots of others too, but whats the problem with that? their result does justify their spending anyway, otherwise how would any mid table team to able to compete with the big boys within such a short period of time?Originally posted by chillz88:Man Utd spending this season and Chelsea spending are different.
Man Utd spend for the future. So most supporters don't expect instant results anyway.
Chelsea buy whatever players other clubs wanted.
And we show our support to our team and not spend more time hating other clubs like some ppl do.![]()