Wild tiger kills Indonesian man
-
Originally posted by Clivebenss:
Earth is too crowded with what?
I just only said save the tiger.
Not wish to argue further.
YOu can choose to be alive in other planet since you said the earth is too crowded.
By being present on earth you are contributing to the crowd.
-
Originally posted by Clivebenss:
Earth is too crowded with what?
I just only said save the tiger.
Not wish to argue further.
ok you win. bye.
-
Originally posted by Clivebenss:
ok you win. bye.
an chua u quote own ur words? -
Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:
an chua u quote own ur words? -
the best solution is to move anfield stadium to berbak national park,jambi.there the tiger can eat as many liverpool fans as the tiger want,until the tiger sian,everytime eat liverpoo,sure confirm sian.like how everytime man utd whacked liverpool,i also sian.but rafael benitez must go...jambi.
-
Human > Animals.
Those who doesn't agree, just wait till one of your love ones is the victim. I see if you will just shrug it off & let the tiger enjoy the meal or not.
-
Originally posted by Fallen-Angel:
Human > Animals.
Those who doesn't agree, just wait till one of your love ones is the victim. I see if you will just shrug it off & let the tiger enjoy the meal or not.
We agree.
But you have to put your statement into the correct context.
It means Humans > Animals (in the context of Humans). We are humans thus we say so.
What about Animals > Humans (in the context of Animals). Those who doesn't agree, just wait till one of your love ones is the victim. I see if you will just shrug it off & let the man shoot your loved ones.
Everything is relative, that's all I have to say.
I don't support one-sided argument. Thanks.
-
a normal news is able to cause fellow forummers to quarrel.
-
Haiz...
Quote out of context.
I just said save the tiger.
It will be a pity if the tiger got killed becos it's a maneater.
-
Originally posted by Clivebenss:
Haiz...
Quote out of context.
I just said save the tiger.
It will be a pity if the tiger got killed becos it's a maneater.
bcos emotion takes over logic
-
chew,
tiger is not a small cute cat where u can pull its whiskers and it still smiles at u with its sharp pokey cheeks......a tiger wu=ill jump on u and bite you with 1 ton of pressure per square inch on yer flesh....and turn you into neatly sliced popiah........ best dun go near cats such as these!
-
how about tyransaurus rex chasing and eating man???
-
Insurance money is the motive
-
Originally posted by TERMINATOR3000:
chew,
tiger is not a small cute cat where u can pull its whiskers and it still smiles at u with its sharp pokey cheeks......a tiger wu=ill jump on u and bite you with 1 ton of pressure per square inch on yer flesh....and turn you into neatly sliced popiah........ best dun go near cats such as these!
-
Originally posted by TERMINATOR3000:
chew,
tiger is not a small cute cat where u can pull its whiskers and it still smiles at u with its sharp pokey cheeks......a tiger wu=ill jump on u and bite you with 1 ton of pressure per square inch on yer flesh....and turn you into neatly sliced popiah........ best dun go near cats such as these!
Finally, we have someone speaks sense. This is human talking. -
Originally posted by Dondontan:
I am trying to bring across the message that a human life is more precious.
Preserve the tiger only when it is not threatenign the life of human
while the statement is valid from a human perspective.
but we also must recognized the notion that human activities has encroach their sphere of living.
-
it's okay...
we know some guys actually kept tigers at home...
that's why they always love the happy hours
-
did anyone read this part "Authorities are investigating why the men camped overnight in a forest where tigers are known to roam, he added.".
they deliberately go into a space where they are exposed to the tigers. how can it be the tigers' fault?
-
Originally posted by BanguIzai:
We agree.
But you have to put your statement into the correct context.
It means Humans > Animals (in the context of Humans). We are humans thus we say so.
What about Animals > Humans (in the context of Animals). Those who doesn't agree, just wait till one of your love ones is the victim. I see if you will just shrug it off & let the man shoot your loved ones.
Everything is relative, that's all I have to say.
I don't support one-sided argument. Thanks.
There is only one sided-argument in this. U can't expect the animals to reply anyway.
-
Originally posted by Arapahoe:
while the statement is valid from a human perspective.
but we also must recognized the notion that human activities has encroach their sphere of living.
It is a totally different case here. Human attacked by tiger. So do we rescue the human or let the tiger go on attacking the human?I am not for hunting for tigers for some selfish interests especially tigers are endangered animal. When coming to protect the survival of the human, just do the necessary.
-
Originally posted by Fallen-Angel:
There is only one sided-argument in this. U can't expect the animals to reply anyway.
-
Originally posted by Dondontan:
It is a totally different case here. Human attacked by tiger. So do we rescue the human or let the tiger go on attacking the human?I am not for hunting for tigers for some selfish interests especially tigers are endangered animal. When coming to protect the survival of the human, just do the necessary.
Wild animal are by nature "wild".....there are ways to relocate but again to where? just look at our Deer population....we don't even have a count of how many are left...until a Road kill.
-
poor guy
-
Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:
it's okay...
we know some guys actually kept tigers at home...
that's why they always love the happy hours
Tiger Lady (the girls selling beer) -
Originally posted by Fallen-Angel:
There is only one sided-argument in this. U can't expect the animals to reply anyway.
can we get some buayas here in sgf to represent the tigers?