44-year-old man on trial for allegedly sexually abusing 4-year-old boy
SINGAPORE: A 44-year-old man is on trial in the High Court for allegedly performing a sexual act on the young son of a good friend.
Peter Lee Chee Soon is accused of committing the crime on the boy
when he was four years old.
When cross-examined by Deputy Public Prosecutor Isaac Tan, the boy who
is now eight years old, told the court via video link that Lee performed
the alleged act on him in Lee's flat in 2005.
The primary three boy also used two anatomically-correct dolls to
demonstrate to the court the sexual act that Lee had allegedly performed
on him.
And when questioned by Lee's lawyer, Wee Pan Lee, the boy testified that
nobody had taught him what he should say in court.
He also said that he had never seen the two dolls before he was
cross-examined on Monday.
Other than this alleged offence, Lee also faces five other charges which
have been stood down for now.
DPP Shahla Iqbal told Justice Kan Ting Chiu that Lee is alleged to have
used criminal force to outrage the modesty of the boy's elder sister
sometime between 1997 and 1998.
She was about six years old at the time.
It's believed that Lee had also committed a similar act of crime on the
boy's aunt sometime between 1994 and 1995 when she was below six years
old.
The plump and bespectacled man is also accused of being in possession of
65 obscene films in 2007.
Lee is now out on bail of S$80,000.
The hearing continues on Tuesday.
- CNA/vm
Is he a human being?
Originally posted by Dondontan:Is he a human being?
he is another sick puupy that should be put to sleep
i still dont understand these ppl, what does a small kid have to molest? -.-
sickos man...
That bugger was about 30 years old when he committed the offence against the children of his good friend.
Good news is he is still below 50, so can cane him.
CUT HIS KKJ~~~~
![]()
I agree ......
we should introduce castration, or at least sterilization, for sex offenders ....
that man is dumb
Children also want to sexually abuse?
Basket..... this calls for castration.
Oh, and since he can afford bail of $80,000, he should pay another $80,000 to pay for the kid's education.
He gave blow jobs to the small boy.
Don't know what he did to the sister and aunt.
Judge ticks off lawyer of man accused of molesting young son of good friend
SINGAPORE : The lawyer representing a 44-year-old man on trial for sexually abusing an eight-year-old boy was ticked off by the trial judge for asking the victim complicated questions during a cross-examination.
At the High Court on Tuesday, Justice Kan Ting Chiu told lawyer
Wee Pan Lee that his questions were "difficult to answer (and) can be
misconstrued as an acceptance ... he is a child and even I have
difficulty understanding".
Mr Wee, who was acting on behalf of Peter Lee Chee Soon, had earlier
asked the boy via video link about the number of times he had been left
alone with the accused.
Lee, a taxi driver, is on trial for allegedly performing fellatio on the
boy, who was four years old in 2005.
On the advice of Justice Kan, Mr Wee broke down his questions to make
them simpler for the Primary Three student to understand.
As a plump, bespectacled Lee sat in the dock taking down notes, Mr Wee
disputed the charges, saying the former had been asked to look after the
boy on three occasions and not six as claimed by the family.
At no time was Lee alone with the boy during the time of the alleged
offence, as Lee's mother was also present in the flat in Yishun, the
lawyer said.
Furthermore, Lee did not perform fellatio but had instead "accidentally"
bitten the boy's penis, said Mr Wee, adding that at no time had his
client intentionally taken off the boy's trousers.
"Not correct," the boy said through an interpreter, looking visibly
tired from the day-long questioning.
Lee originally faced five other charges which included outraging the
modesty the boy's sister, now 18 and aunt, 20.
These charges have, however, been stood down.
He is now out on bail of $80,000. If convicted, he could be jailed for
life, or jailed up to 10 years and fined.
The hearing continues on Wednesday.
- CNA /ls
Furthermore, Lee did not perform fellatio but had instead "accidentally" bitten the boy's penis, said Mr Wee, adding that at no time had his client intentionally taken off the boy's trousers.
which law firm this wee fellow's from again ? ....
=.=
they saying he play with the boy Power Rangers ???
Originally posted by Fatum:Furthermore, Lee did not perform fellatio but had instead "accidentally" bitten the boy's penis, said Mr Wee, adding that at no time had his client intentionally taken off the boy's trousers.
which law firm this wee fellow's from again ? ....
LMAO~ simi call bitten by accident~~~ ![]()
What teh phuck~~~ ![]()
Originally posted by ^Acid^ aka s|aO^eH~:
LMAO~ simi call bitten by accident~~~What teh phuck~~~
lawyers mah ....
you pay for their beemers, they got to say something right ?
Originally posted by Fatum:lawyers mah ....
you pay for their beemers, they got to say something right ?
lawyers? I think u meant liars~ ![]()
He also "accidentally" ate the girl's cake?
They don't have to testify, as the charges were stood down.