Titanic had an identical sister ship, Olympic which was completed earlier than the Titanic and was damaged in a collision with a naval ship. Cunard was unable to get any compensation for the damaged ship.
Simply switch their name plates and it could have been the Olympic that sank and not the Titanic.
When the Titanic sank, many of America's richest men perished, many of whom were very against the formation of the Federal Reserve. Among them the heads of the Astor and Guggenheim families.
JP Morgan, one of the owners of the Federal Reserve, stepped off the Titanic just prior to the ship's maiden voyage.
Pure coincidence or did he had foreknowledge of what's going to happen ?
What's more, World War One would not have been possible if not for the funding provided by United States (Federal Reserve) to Britain and France for a lengthy and profitable conflict for the bankers.
In 2005, two independent divers, using deep water MIR submarines, found two new parts of the bottom of the hull of Titanic separate from the hull and stern at the bottom of the Atlantic. That means that this great ship, which nudged an iceberg, somehow broke into four pieces.
In 2005, another expedition by two American divers found two never-before-seen large sections. They were nearly a mile away from the forward and rear pieces of the hull!
New steamships had to be broken first as they were not able to make good speed during their first two days out. So the idea that Titanic tried to set a speed record on her maiden voyage doesn't make sense.
Firsthand
reports and testimonies shortly after the disaster indicated that if the ship struck the iceberg at
all, it continued to slip on past the iceberg. There certainly was no
jolt. This was the testimony of the first officer of
Titanic days after the tragedy.
It never made sense that a seasoned captain such as Capt.
Smith (a Freemason)would have gone
storming through an ice field. All the testimonies given in United States and Great Britain reveal that not one passenger was sure of a collision.
The story is that 300 feet of steel suffered a gash 3/4" wide, and that this was caused by the tearing action of the iceberg. No tool made of ice is strong enough to cut 300 feet of 1 inch steel.
In earlier versions of the disaster there was no prior mention of the stern breaking off. The doomed ship rising out of the water which sends the stern crashing down as it breaks at the deck is a recent development.
And your point of conspiracy is that James Cameron great grand father sunk the ship so that James Cameron can make billions out of the movies to shut the studios up. And wrote the script for Avatar.
Originally posted by Arapahoe:And your point of conspiracy is that James Cameron great grand father sunk the ship so that James Cameron can make billions out of the movies to shut the studios up. And wrote the script for Avatar.
LOL..nice one..
But then again should this conspiracy be true it gonna definitely change the way we look at history.
you can never know...........as long as there's some evidence against the ''official'' story, you just never know...........
the 9/11 attacks are so obvious it's an inside job and the towers were demolished that there are tons and tons of evidence from experts and policemen, firemen as witnesses...........
if something like that can happen in modern times, who is to say similar inside jobs don't happen long ago !
Originally posted by Asromanista2001:you can never know...........as long as there's some evidence against the ''official'' story, you just never know...........
the 9/11 attacks are so obvious it's an inside job and the towers were demolished that there are tons and tons of evidence from experts and policemen, firemen as witnesses...........
if something like that can happen in modern times, who is to say similar inside jobs don't happen long ago !
u have forgotten that james cameron had his team to film the wreckage so u need 2 do more research.....perharp look at the film strip b4 making claims.
so a movie director is more credible ?
aiyoh...............