[Post Election] Nicole Seah's Letter to Singaporeans

• Guess?

  2 May 11, 15:39

  ...

• Guess?

  2 May 11, 15:49

  ..

• kinwashi

  2 May 11, 18:04

  Got this email from nowhere, junk mail...sender unknown.

   

  
  

  Subject: Interesting
  
  

  
   
  Gonna be interesting election. Ground not sweet at all.....
   
  My vote counts: 10 reasons why I cannot vote for the PAP in the next election
  By yaevlejunce 
  That so many Singaporeans behave like sheep and recite the prescribed mantra all the time about our government (namely, that we owe it all to them) really only reveals the plight of our people. Not only are Singaporeans amongst the lowest earners in the developed world in monetary terms, they are also almost definitely the poorest in the faculty to think for themselves, as a result of the education system.
  
  Now that I am 21 and of age to vote, I am unable to vote for the PAP in the coming election because there is such an urgent need to send across a strong signal through their very thick skulls that there is a problem in the way it’s running this country. I am not a member of the Opposition, and I do not want the Opposition to take over this country, but because there will always be too many sheep in Singapore anyway, we need every vote FOR the Opposition, just to manage to produce a dent in the PAP’s smugly expected results. There will always be the apathetic, the boot-lickers, the cowardly, and the ignorant to ensure they win eventually anyway.
  
  The difference we can make, however, is how much it wins by. Perhaps if it loses a GRC or two (and the GRC is a PAP invention), they will shake off their slumber and start ruling Singapore as a Republic, that is, for the public, for the People (rather than for personal interests).
  
  Remember how LKY said he will send in the army if there ever is a “freak election” and the PAP is voted out of Parliament? In every other country, when the people vote out the ruling party, it is called a mandate. It is only in Singapore that such a vote is called a “freak election”. Also, whose Army is it anyway? Is it the Army of the people of Singapore – who have just voted out the PAP? Or is it the Army of the PAP?
  
  I list here ten out of the many other reasons why I am unable to vote for the PAP:
  
  .
  
  1. I will not render unto Caesar what is not Caesar’s
  
  Given that Singapore’s poor are amongst the Developed World’s poorest, while living standards are amongst the highest in the world, it is not difficult to see why the Government’s ridiculous salaries are distastefully inflated.
  
  The President earns $3.9 million, the PM $3.8 million, the MM and SM $3.5 million each, all other ministers between $2 to $3.2 million and all ministers of state between $1.5 to $1.8 million. These salaries do not include MP allowances, pensions and other sources of income such as Directorship, Chairmanship, Advisory, Consultancy, etc to government-linked and government-related organisations or foreign MNCs, etc. And why are they allowed to work for foreign corporations in the first place? Weren’t their ridiculously-high salaries justified with the excuse that it’ll be THIS excessive precisely so that they will focus on doing their ministerial jobs? Where is the check and balance in this government?
  
  How much do you earn in a year?
  
  In contrast, President Obama earns a more reasonable US$400,000, with US$50,000 expenses. Our most junior ministers are paid more than twice of what the most powerful man in the world gets! Hong Kong, with the same scarcity of resources as Singapore, half the developable land area, but with double the economic success, only pays its Chief Executive Donald Tsang HK$371,885 (US$47, 678). No other nation in the world, no matter how rich or corruption-free, pays it leaders anywhere near ours. That is good enough to show that the PAP rhetoric about their paycheques is plain rubbish (incidentally, “rubbish” seems to be one of LKY’s favourite words).
  
  Adding to that, it had the cheek to raise its own salary right before a GST hike in 2003 and 2004. GST was raised again in 2007 to 7% from the original 3%. And of course, the PAP salaries have been rising accordingly as well.
  
  It claims it needs to be paid similar to the private sector, but this is the public sector for a reason – you choose to work in the government to serve the country, not your pockets. Arguing that “talents” need this monetary incentive to join the government only goes to show what kind of people are being attracted – greedy, selfish, money-minded elites who see the Civil Service as nothing but a more glamorous avenue to the big bucks since their main reason for serving is not for the good of the country, but for money.
  
  I cannot vote for a government that decides its own ridiculous salaries DESPITE a very strong public opinion against it.
  
  .
  
  2. Incompetence
  
  Despite paying astronomic salaries to these patron saints of Singapore, there is much to be desired from their performance. Surely, if we are paying the highest government salaries in the world, it is not unreasonable to simply expect these people to do their job. The recent Bukit Timah Floodings, however, is a case in point showing why this expectation may be misplaced.
  
  Environment Minister Yaacob Ibrahim said that the government knew the diversion canal was not big enough to take the rainwaters. He claimed that because this sort of “freak events” occur only once every 50 years, there was nothing the government could do about it. The Bukit Timah Canal was constructed in 1972, almost 40 years ago – about time something that happens “once every 50 years” would occur. Additionally, meteorologists reported that ‘this flood comes three years after one of Singapore’s worst floodings in recent history, in December 2006‘. 50 years indeed. But alas, our $2.8 million/year Minister was unable to foresee such a simple thing – even while knowing the canal was not big enough! Well, the PUB is planning to work on expanding it now – pretty late or early (depending on where in Singapore you live), since the next time we really need it will be 50 years from now, according to the Minister.
  
  .
  
  3. Double standards
  
  It is a well-known fact that GIC and Temasek Holdings, Singapore’s two sovereign wealth funds, are both headed by members of the Lee family. Both have reported a ridiculous loss of $41.6 Billion <http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/09/29/singapores-gic-suffers-41-6-billion-loss/>  and$39.91 Billion <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124350003544761935.html>  respective and have yet to answer to the real stakeholders – Singaporeans – on how this could have happened. No one has taken responsibility or issued explanations or anythingat all. In fact, the state media has been glaringly silent on the issue. Why aren’t we Singaporeans hearing anything about ourmoney?
  
  “When we invest, we invest for the long-term”, Lee Kuan Yew, who heads GIC, said when Temasek Holdings purchased Bank of America shares and then sold it off a few months later, losing <http://www.yawningbread.org/arch_2009/yax-1037.htm> between US$2.3 to US$4.6 billion just like that.
  
  That is more than $80 Billion in total from the blood and sweat of Singaporeans, down the drain because of bad decisions made by individuals whose multi-million dollar paycheques remain secure no matter how many mistakes they make. In contrast, the Resilience Package tapped into Singapore’s official reserves to withdraw $4.9 billion, and that effort to help Singaporeans in genuine need required hours and hours of debate.
  
  While we should rightfully acknowledge the good that the PAP has done for Singapore, it is often taken for granted that Singaporeans believe a blatant lie that the country’s affluence is owed to the PAP and Lee Kuan Yew’s efforts. No, it came from the efforts of allSingaporeans. Hong Kong did not have a strongman like Lee Kuan Yew to dictate their lives from toilet habits to whether they could hear their own dialect on TV, and yet they have achieved double of what we have – and their people are involved in the political process, not dead and apathetic like our population. There is absolutely no reason to believe that Singapore, with its strategic location and hardworking population, would not have reached its present affluence under a less money-minded David Marshall or someone else.
  
  Moreover, the oft-used justification for the lofty salaries of the government is that the private sector pays its leaders similar salaries. Well, in the private sector, there is such a thing asaccountability. Where is Temasek Holdings’ accountability? Where is GIC’s accountability? Where was Wong Kan Seng’s accountability when his Ministry slipped up time and time again? Where is Yaacob Ibrahim’s accountability? What exactly happens when a minister makes a mistake in Singapore? Where is the Fourth Estate to play its role as a watchdog?
  
  .
  
  4. Blatant lies
  
  We are probably the only country in the world that has had its MPs possibly blatantly lie in Parliament and yet achieve high rankings on corruptibility. Anyone remember the mention of White Horses in Parliament? Practically every NSF believes that there is such a thing as White Horses, yet right there in Parliament, an affront to the ideals of democracy, transparency and integrity in this country, our leaders possibly lied to its people (I am not sure if they really did lie, but that so many people believe that White Horses still exist begs the question). If it could do that once, it could have done it before, and it can do it again. What is the point of wearing white, trying to look pure, if you are a liar? If they did lie, I cannot vote for such blatant liars to be my leaders – especially when they lie about such things NOT for the good of the country, but for their own interests, for the unfairly selective comfort of their own children at the very expense of the equality this country was founded upon.
  
  The media in Singapore is entirely controlled via Singapore Press Holdings, headed by a former PAP minister, Dr Tony Tan. Masquerading as an independent paper, the Straits Times, while not necessarily fabricating facts on its own (at least I hope not), blatantly twists them. For example (extracted from here <http://www.temasekreview.com/2009/11/26/role-of-state-media-in-making-singapore-leaders-appear-better-than-they-are-part-2/> ), the media was full of praise of Temasek CEO Ho Ching for earning a few million dollars on paper, but failed to highlight her disastrous investment decisions such as buying the shares of Barclays bank at a high and selling them at a low a few months later.
  
  The Straits Times credited the Singapore Internal Security Department for providing the crucial “intelligence” which led to the capture of escaped terrorist Mas Selamat Kasteri by the Malaysian Special Branch. It turned out that the operation was part of a joint collaboration by the Malaysian, Singapore and Indonesian police and the Singapore ISD actually played only a minor role in the capture of Mas Selamat, but the Straits Times did not mention this to give the public the full picture, choosing rather to mislead Singaporeans into believing that ISD had indeed “redeemed” itself.
  
  Without a free press in Singapore, Singaporeans are robbed of access to real and accurate news that does not include propaganda and spins that mislead. They are robbed of a crucial check and balance in the form of the Fourth Estate that acts as a watchdog to ensure the government is doing its job. Afterall, government corruptibility has more often than once been revealed solely because of a free press, an example of which is the Watergate Scandal. A free press will act as a check on corruptibility, not sky-high salaries. In the end, if media content is regulated by the government, it is Singaporeans who stand to lose.
  
  .
  
  5. Operation Coldstore and the 1963 General Elections
  
  The 1963 Singapore General Elections was the toughest and most critical the PAP ever faced. It had already suffered two by-election defeats and the number of seats it held was 26 – holding a majority by just one seat.
  
  On 2 February 1963, just a few months before the elections, Operation Coldstore was launched and more than a hundred people were arrested and detained without trial, including the Secretary-General and other key members of the Barisan Sosialis, the PAP’s biggest threat.
  
  Despite the heavy blow, which was obviously undermined the Barisan Sosialis’ success at the Elections, they won 33.2% of the popular vote and the PAP took 46.9%. What do you think the PAP would have gotten if it hadn’t carried out Operation Coldstore?
  
  And why do Singaporeans not know about such an important aspect of their national history?
  
  .
  
  6. Lim Chin Siong
  
  Lim Chin Siong was recruited into the PAP by Lee Kuan Yew in 1954, and his immense popularity amongst the Chinese won a large amount of support for the PAP. When Lim Chin Siong was arrested by the British in 1955 for anti-colonial activities, the PAP promised the electorate to release him if they were elected, in order to gain votes.
  
  At the age of 22, Lim Chin Siong was elected into the Legislative Assembly, and he was so popular among the people that Lee Kuan Yew was prompted to promise that he would be ‘our future Prime Minister‘ (guess who became PM instead?).
  
  However, he soon grew disillusioned with the PAP and left to form the Barisan Sosialis in 1961. Under the pretext of being a communist, he was detained without trial under Operation Coldstore for SIX YEARS until he was forced to renounce politics and went into exile in 1969. Up till today, there is hardly any concrete evidence at all that he was ever a communist. Yet, it was the reason he was eliminated from the precarious 1963 General Elections. Imagine being removed from your family, being locked up for 6 years, NEVER given a trial, and then thrown out of the country, all because you are popular and the government fears you?
  
  Lee Kuan Yew himself said of him “I liked and respected him for his simple lifestyle and his selflessness. He did not seek financial gain or political glory. He was totally committed to the advancement of his cause“. This was the kind of men who sincerely fought with their lives for the good of the country. And they were persecuted and crushed by the PAP in order to snatch power. Contrast the lives of such men with the kind of PAP MPs we have today.
  
  [13th Dec '09 - Edit: Click here <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Spectrum>  to read about Operation Spectrum, launched in 1987 under that terrible ISA again. Over 20 people were detained without trial under the accusation of a Marxist conspiracy. After being released a few months later, they repudiated their earlier confessions, alleged ill-treatment by ISD officers while in detention, and were arrested the very next day(how come this sort of efficiency is lacking withreal threats like Mas Selamat?). Ten days later, the government announced that a proposed commission of inquiry into the allegations made by the detainees was no longer necessary as the signatories have since recanted their statement while in detention. Hmm, I wonder why.
  
  Excerpt from their statement:
  
  "...we were subjected to harsh and intensive interrogation, deprived of sleep and rest, some of us for as long as 70 hours insides freezing cold rooms. All of us were stripped of our personal clothing, including spectacles, footwear and underwear and made to change into prisoners' uniforms.
  
  Most of us were made to stand continually during interrogation, some of us for over 20 hours and under the full blast of air-conditioning turned to a very low temperature.
  
  Under these conditions, one of us was repeatedly doused with cold water during interrogation.
  
  Most of us were hit hard in the face, some of us for not less than 50 times, while others were assaulted on other parts of the body, during the first three days of interrogation.
  
  We were threatened with more physical abuse during interrogation.
  
  We were threatened with arrests, assault and battery of our spouses, loved ones and friends. We were threatened with INDEFINITE detention without trial. Chia Thye Poh, who is still in detention after twenty years, was cited as an example. We were told that no one could help us unless we "cooperated" with the ISD.
  
  These threats were constantly on our minds during the time we wrote our respective "statements" in detention.
  
  We were actively discouraged from engaging legal counsel and advised to discharge our lawyers and against taking legal action (including making representations to the ISA Advisory Board) so as not to jeopardise our chances of release.
  
  We were compelled to appear on television and warned that our release would depend on our performances on tv. We were coerced to make statements such as "I am Marxist-inclined..."; "My ideal society is a classless society..." ; " so-and-so is my mentor..."; "I was made use of by so-and-so..." in order to incriminate ourselves and other detainees."
  
  This is another reason why I will not be able to vote for the PAP. I cannot bring myself to support such a brutal and callous government which treats its people as such. And I cannot support its continued use of the ISA in Singapore, in spite of its usefulness in handling terrorists (who is the real terrorist here?), because time and again, history has shown that it is innocent Singaporeans who will suffer most from such a law that allows the government to conveniently eliminate all threats to itself - not the nation - without trial, without evidence, without accountability of any kind.]
  
  [Edit: 15th Dec '09 - Click here <http://jacob69.wordpress.com/2009/12/13/the-coffee-shop-murder-j-b-jeyaretnam-and-the-death-penalty/>  for yet another forced confession account.]
  
  .
  
  7. Singaporean students need to learn a fair and accurate history in school
  
  The fact that practically no young Singaporean knows about important people like Lim Chin Siong, or even David Marshall, our first Chief Minister, is testament to the spectacular failure of our education system. All they ever learn about our country’s history is LKY and Raffles, LKY and Raffles, LKY and Raffles, and maybe a bit about the War. No wonder our students find history boring. No wonder our students do not feel attached to this country because their knowledge of its history is so shallow.
  
  Why has MOE removed the important bits of Singapore’s history from schoolbooks? The bits about Operation Coldstore (and the realities behind it), the historic Anson by-election, the real founder of the PAP (who, by the way, is not surnamed Lee), our ex-President Devan Nair, Ong Teng Cheong’s request <http://www.yawningbread.org/arch_2005/yax-444.htm>  – which was never granted to the day he died – to be given a list of Singapore’s reserves (because as President he needed to know what he is protecting, since the President’s role is to be Protector of the Reserves – and did you know that the President’s role is that, by the way?), etc. Why are Singaporeans being robbed of their history and then accused of being apathetic?
  
  .
  
  8. Traumatic MP-experiences and MPs who fear death by The Chair
  
  The kind of PAP MPs that Singapore is ruled by today is a worthy cause for Trauma <http://blog.dk.sg/2009/05/20/online-letter-mp-had-no-empathy/> .
  
  In short, a married couple went to see their MP because their eldest son recently passed away from a naval accident while serving NS. They explained that their younger son will be serving his NS soon and requested for an exemption because of what had just happened. They said that it’s been a traumatic time for them. And the MP replied “What traumatic? After two months, you won’t be traumatic”.
  
  As if insensitive MPs are not enough, the PAP is fielding hyper-sensitive wimps <http://singaporemind.blogspot.com/2009/05/boy-arrested-for-slamming-chair-at-mp.html>  behind the shadows with their GRC Trick. Tell me who on earth has ever been afraid of being killed by an aluminium chair slammed against a door? And where is the sympathy? Where is the waving it off as “an honest mistake” especially when there was no harm done?
  
  The GRC, by the way, was invented by the PAP. The fact that it seems to engage in gerrymandering (drawing up election borders in its favour) goes to show the extent it is willing to go just to stay in power. The GRC is also unfair because constituents are forced to vote into Parliament men and women they do not really want to have. This whole system, however, was implemented without asking Singaporeans, of course. The PAP decided it wanted to have the GRCs, and it passed the law to have the GRCs. No say from the people at all. Is this democracy? Is gerrymandering for the good of the people?
  
  With such people ruling the country, it is honestly difficult to believe we are in good hands. Contrasted against the lives of men such as Lim Chin Siong, it is hard to rule out the severe suspicion that the MPs we have today are joining the Government for personal interest, not the nation’s.
  
  .
  
  9. Money. Of course it’s all about money.
  
  Singapore claims it pays its ministers astronomical salaries because “talents” need to be attracted from the private sector – this is simply saying that our ministers serve the country just for money.
  
  Also, their pay is pegged to GDP growth – which is why it is no wonder that everything in this country seems to be focused on the economy. The government is so caught up in money-making because its salaries are pegged to it! Moreover, if Singaporeans are attuned to the mentality that money is all there is to life (and many, many Singaporeans are), then they will be less bothered about the other compromises to their civil rights, and less likely to be concerned about what their government is really doing, so long as the money keeps flowing in. What a cheap people we have become.
  
  .
  
  10. What Singapore needs is change
  
  Lastly, by voting for a significant change to the status quo, Singaporean youths will become less apathetic, seeing that, for the first time in their lives, CHANGE is really possible in this country, and that they can make a difference in deciding for the future of Singapore.
  
  The PAP will also be less complacent if it meets with a stunning defeat. Its cold Point 8-type ministers will also learn that it is Singaporeans they are supposed to be serving, not themselves. They will learn to treasure their constituents, to sincerely listen their opinions and to truly help them – all these are SUPPOSED to be their job in the first place.
  
  People will also start to dare to join the Opposition. The only reason why I do not wish for the Opposition to take over the government is because it is incompetent, and it is incompetent because talented men and women who are concerned about the aforementioned issues, do not have the courage or faith in the system to step forward and join the Opposition (hell no, not with a law like the ISA in place). But if the PAP faces a defeat that is significant enough, trust in the democratic system of Singapore will finally be restored and the politics of Singapore can be revived to more than just dead rhetoric.
  
  Of course we are grateful for the many, many good things the PAP has done for Singapore. It has been an excellent government in many ways (especially economically – I wonder why). However, it has also been found lacking in many aspects. Politics is not a charity, as they would themselves say with regard to the Opposition, and we cannot vote for a government simply because it used to serve the people well. If it has lost its focus, then support for the Opposition is the only way to make them regain this focus. No one ever says “I have a good salary already, please donot give me a pay rise”. Everyone wants improvements to their lives, and if we care about this country, we should seek improvements to the way it is run as well, even if we are satisfied with this country to start with.
  
  My vote counts. So will yours. Vote wisely

• komade

  2 May 11, 18:25

  Originally posted by Insg:

  Cheapo! Tissue u oso wan?

  Use to wipe face kena pimples. Wipe back side, back side itchy.

  
  Not gian the tissue juz the gesture they r showing wan to make me laugh...... :P
• kinwashi

  2 May 11, 20:33

  

  SDP refutes report of post-rally march, party split

  By Alicia Wong | SingaporeScene – Mon, May 2, 2011 11:38 AM SGT

  • Email
  • Print

  

  SDP's Chee Soon Juan signing autographs at the rally. (Photo from SDP website, www.yoursdp.org)

  The Singapore Democratic Party has denied rumours of a split within the party.

  According to The Straits Times, the rumour comes after a report in Sunday's The New Paper (TNP) said party members had to stop party leader Chee Soon Juan from staging a march after the SDP rally at Jurong East stadium last Friday.

  Three unnamed SDP members told TNP the party held an urgent meeting after the rally and reminded Dr Chee that the rally permit was at stake.

  However, in a statement entitled "Does this look like a protest march?" posted on its website on Sunday, the SDP said Dr Chee and SDP candidates were only thanking supporters last Friday as rally-goers left the stadium. The party accused the paper of spreading "untruths".

  Said the statement: "Along the way many of them asked for Dr Chee's autograph and wanted to take pictures with the SDP Secretary-General."

  "Dr Chee paused for long moments to oblige the supporters and to chat with them. Is this The New Paper's idea of a march? At no point did Dr Chee or anyone else plan to do a march."

  The party likened the situation to its Saturday's rally at Woodlands stadium, where Dr Chee also walked through the crowd, greeting rally-goers.

  At its rally on Sunday night, SDP candidates Ang Yong Guan and Vincent Wijeysingha addressed this issue and dismissed talk of any disagreement within the party.

  Dr Ang said, "I wonder if this is another one of those tactics, propaganda, to dilute the show of force that is happening in Holland-Bukit Timah, Sembawang, Yuhua and Bukit Panjang."

  The SDP is contesting in these areas.

  However, TNP editor Dominic Nathan told ST the tabloid stands by its story. He declined further comment.

  Watch a video shot by The Online Citizen of the incident in question.
  

  
  

  Follow Yahoo! News on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

  This article is published by Yahoo! Southeast Asia Pte. Ltd., 60 Anson Road #13-01 Mapletree Anson, Singapore, 079914.

  • Email
  • Print

  153 comments

  Show:                                  Newest FirstOldest FirstHighest RatedMost Replied                             

   Post a comment

  • Comments 1 - 20 of 153
  • First
  • Prev
  • Next
  • Last

  • 

    2685

    Vote Singapore 8 hours ago Report Abuse

    We want the Straits Times, New Paper and the Television Media to STOP this rubbish about Opposition Members.
    
    I have seen a video of Dr Chee stopped by supporters asking for autographs to which he has obliged. That was NOT a protest march. The idiots at Straits Times should be sued.
    
    I have thus far attended rallies by both SDP and the WP, and yet the manner in which the media has covered the rallies is nothing short of pathetic. I am absolutely disgusted.
    
    What i have seen and read in the media so far is, headlines of PAP ministers questioning the integrity and ability of the Opposition, marginalising them, making wild and baseless allegations and even threats.
    
    Well we voted for the PAP in 2006. Apart from peace and cleanliness on the streets and the regular upgrading, what have Singaporeans benefitted from?.
    
    The bread and butter issues like food, job, finance, helath and education have been overlooked. This government is so terrified of losing its seat that it seems to go to no end to marginalaise anyone.
    
    We the people of Singapore need to make a stand. Do we want this form of government anymore?
    
    We do not want to hear or read of anymore of this rubbish. We dont need any more of this threats. We need to make this government and the media accountable.
    
    The Power of the People MUST come thuru at this government. We dont need the posters of Oppostion party members, we dont need their rallies, we dont need thier walkabouts, We stand shoulder to shoulder with them in raising this nation from the ashes again.
    
    The Oppostion is the only chance we have and the people must support them, so that we are not bullied anymore and marginalised by this government.
    
    This country has to change, or out future and the future of this country is doomed for ever. 
    
    Lets show this government we will rise above them.

    Replies (14)

• kinwashi

  2 May 11, 22:10

  Originally posted by komade:

  
  Not gian the tissue juz the gesture they r showing wan to make me laugh...... :P

  

  Aljunied has five years to 'repent' if it chooses WP: MM

  By Ion Danker | SingaporeScene – Sat, Apr 30, 2011 11:58 PM SGT

  • Email
  • Print

  

  Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew has warned Aljunied voters they will have to live and "repent" for the next five years if they vote in the Workers' Party (WP) team at Aljunied GRC.
  
  Speaking at PAP's Radin Mas branch on Saturday, Singapore's founding father said the PAP will not lose in this election, as the only hot-seat is Aljunied.
  
  But he said, "If Aljunied decides to go that way, well Aljunied has five years to live and repent."
  
  MM Lee added that he does not consider it a major setback if the People's Action Party (PAP) loses the the contest, that it would not be "the end of the world" as the PAP would fight to get the GRC back.

  "We accept the verdict of the people, but they must also accept the consequences of their actions. You must expect the PAP to look after PAP constituencies first."

  His latest comments come hot on the heels of another stern warning to voters on Friday, when he said Aljunied voters will "pay a price, the hard way" if they voted for the Opposition. His remarks then sparked a huge backlash online, with close to 3,000 comments on Yahoo! alone questioning MM Lee's motives.

  Netizens have also not taken too kindly to the 87-year-old's latest warnings, calling them a thinly veiled threat to voters.

  Yahoo! News reader Secret wrote, "Dear MM Lee, I am a resident of Aljunied... I do not need you to either lecture or intimidate me. You and your ilk may be the "CEO" of Singapore Inc now, but even the CEO has to answer to the stakeholders -- and we citizens are the stakeholders who have the right to either keep you employed or fire you."

  Another reader Jubilant said, "Voters of Aljunied GRC will be intimidated by your threats. Instead you should be the one to repent for insulting the intelligence of Aljunied voters."

  Users of micro-blogging service Twitter were also quick to criticise MM Lee.

  @SamanthaDelina said, "Quite disgusted by MM Lee's comments on WP. No matter how great PAP is, I don't see a need for them to put others down."

  Another user @duncanchew was also appalled and wondered, "How can those words come out from MM Lee's mouth?"

  On Saturday, MM Lee also questioned WP's real intentions.

  "It's not just to win one GRC. Let's have no hypocrisy about this, every political party sets out to win and win a majority and they are setting out from a single constituency to a GRC and then expand to more GRCs and then take over. It's up to you to decide whether they are capable of running Singapore," he said.

  The high-powered 'A' team from the Workers's Party contesting the Aljunied hotspot consists of former Hougang MP Low Thia Khiang, former NCMP Sylvia Lim, the party's "star catch" Chen Show Mao as well as family counsellor Muhamad Faisal Abdul Manap and post-graduate law student Pritam Singh.

  They will be up against the incumbent PAP team fronted by Foreign Affairs Minister George Yeo, Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Lim Hwee Hua, Senior Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Zainul Abidin Rasheed, Madam Cynthia Phua and new face Ong Ye Kung, an assistant secretary-general of NTUC .

  Separately on Saturday, Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong also commented on the impact should Mr Yeo and his Aljunied GRC team be voted out of Parliament.

  Speaking at a rally in Marine Parade GRC, SM Goh said Mr Yeo has been handling delicate negotiations with Malaysia and Indonesia on border issues.

  Describing that Singapore has a "beautiful arrangement" -- with an Indian as President, a Chinese as Prime Minister and a Malay, Zainul Abidin Rasheed, as potential Speaker of Parliament -- SM Goh said that "on the basis of merit we ended up with this, a politically balanced, beautiful picture'.

  "You knock out George Yeo and Zainul Abidin. Well, you'll have to look for another Speaker on the basis of merit. Well, that person may not be Zainul Abidin once he's out, or another Malay MP.

  "These are the fine points of politics which we in PAP understand, which we try to manage quietly. But the opposition says never mind, George Yeo can be a diplomat. Come off it, that's not the way you build up a first-rate government."

  Related news

  Aljunied voters will regret choosing WP: MM Lee

  Follow Yahoo! News on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

  This article is published by Yahoo! Southeast Asia Pte. Ltd., 60 Anson Road #13-01 Mapletree Anson, Singapore, 079914.

  • Email
  • Print

  2,033 comments

  Show:                                  Newest FirstOldest FirstHighest RatedMost Replied                             

   Post a comment

  • Comments 1 - 20 of 2033
  • First
  • Prev
  • Next
  • Last

   

   

  Komade you are correct.
  Not gian the tissue juz the gesture they r showing wan to make me laugh...... :P

• Vee4317l

  2 May 11, 23:00

  Originally posted by riskman:

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84ljzIdevQk

  We paid so much money for this type of standard. Like seventh month auctioneer?? !! ??

  
  This video has been removed by the user.
• Vee4317l

  2 May 11, 23:02

  Originally posted by Poolman:

  Wanna see a genuine heart to the People of The Republic of Singapore ?

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKnosASSnlY&NR=1

  Tribute to Mr Chiam See Tong .

  Mr Chiam forever will be in our heart !

  Win or lose .... An icon for a very successful Opposition MP .

   

  
  See already very sad, dare not see, No tissue Paper too.
• Insg

  3 May 11, 01:58

  Originally posted by komade:

  
  Not gian the tissue juz the gesture they r showing wan to make me laugh...... :P

  I know u not the gian png type. U should know their pattern after living in Singapore for so long, right bo?

  Their pettiness (btw got this word or not?) is what I hated most. They don't deserve my support.

• komade

  3 May 11, 05:10

  Originally posted by Insg:

  I know u not the gian png type. U should know their pattern after living in Singapore for so long, right bo?

  Their pettiness (btw got this word or not?) is what I hated most. They don't deserve my support.

  
  Me also 1 of a kind, purposely put opposition logo outside my house juz to see got wat kind of response now i knoe liao...... :P
• Poolman

  3 May 11, 05:29

  I just went to the SDP Rally at Commonwealth .

  I am terribly impressed by Mr Aziz , Mr Gomez and Dr Ang .

  If people are to say , opposition has got no talent , hey people , u jolly well make a trip down to see those rallies by SDP if got time .

  Oh my god Mr Tan Jee Say... what can i say ?

  If you think PAP has got good economist , i tell you this , PAP has just got a jewel slipped away .

  Not 1 , but fair to say , Dr Ang and Gomez .

  Mr Tan can be good enough to be our Prime Minister !!

  I recommend you see how good are they at www.yoursdp.org .

• Poolman

  3 May 11, 05:32

  I tell you what my comrades ...

  If MM Lee said Aljunied residence will regret choosing WP , i think Bukit Panjang and Holland will regret not to choose Mr Tan over Balakrishnan .

  i think Mr Tan can contribute more to Singapore , than just Casino by Balakrishnan .

• Poolman

  3 May 11, 05:36

  Gosh , looked at Mr Tan's resume ....

  and Dr Ang , and the charismatic Gomez ....

  Plus Encik Aziz .

  I had to go last night without listening to Vincent and Mr Tan .

  Now i am on YouTube .

  Gosh !!

• komade

  3 May 11, 07:07

  i also like tis guy charisma frm Bukit Panjang SDP Alec Tok http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEwYKEURUJM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0h5VRJo9STk
• Sgm40 vps

  3 May 11, 15:56

  Coming Sat, me wake up,

  go bathe with flower water,

  change nice nice,

  hold hands with my wife,

  walk to that pri sch,

  cast my vote (make sure no lightning one),

  go coffee shop eat breakfast,

  Buy 4D (my poll card serial no)

  After that, start engine go driving with a fresh & happy mind!

   

• Poolman

  3 May 11, 16:21

  Okay all the best to the opposition ...

  I hope those Aljunied residence , know what is at stake for this election , they are the representing the whole of Singapore .

  Singaporeans to suffer or less suffering depends on Aljunied residences .

  They vote Aljunied for PAP , that's it , prepare to get whacked big time .

  For the next 5 years .

  Some people say nia .... sau vote opposition , then end up picking the thunder , phui to this people , scumsbag .

• Poolman

  3 May 11, 16:23

  I want Mr Tan Jee Say and team to pass the test , to bad , not many people read about them .

   

• Red5xx

  3 May 11, 16:28

  Originally posted by Poolman:

   

  Some people say nia .... sau vote opposition , then end up picking the thunder , phui to this people , scumsbag .

  Not me hor!!

  I can swear!!!

  WPWPWPWPWPWPWP

• Sgm40 vps

  3 May 11, 16:30

  Some people say nia .... sau vote opposition , then end up picking the thunder , phui to this people , scumsbag .

  U knw why they dun allow ppl to bring handphone into the voting box? to take picture and show around..

  If can, me sure take my own voting slip and put it for my facebook picture!

  haa

• komade

  3 May 11, 16:46

  Originally posted by Sgm40 vps:

  U knw why they dun allow ppl to bring handphone into the voting box? to take picture and show around..

  If can, me sure take my own voting slip and put it for my facebook picture!

  haa

  
  haha yah lor too bad galaxy tab too big liao cannot sneak in.......
• Cash Lee

  3 May 11, 16:52

  Originally posted by Poolman:

  Okay all the best to the opposition ...

  I hope those Aljunied residence , know what is at stake for this election , they are the representing the whole of Singapore .

  Singaporeans to suffer or less suffering depends on Aljunied residences .

  They vote Aljunied for PAP , that's it , prepare to get whacked big time .

  For the next 5 years .

  Some people say nia .... sau vote opposition , then end up picking the thunder , phui to this people , scumsbag .

  HaaHaaHaaHaa......so you guys, don't play play with he har.....how's your life going to be is now depend on me......hahaha...

• ALN

  3 May 11, 17:25

  so this Sat how har? everyone also say vote for them... ALN eat ice cream and listen till blur blur...
• ALN

  3 May 11, 17:27

  what time u all go voting har? ALN fri 6pm otr till sat 6am... then must wait till 8 am then voting open wor....
• ALN

  3 May 11, 17:31

  Sat 9pm to midnite sure no pax hor? like that maybe otr 6pm to 9pm keep liao? lose $?! jia lat...
• kinwashi

  3 May 11, 18:37

  Oops what is this? F1  SG Taxi driver.

  http://www.mrbrown.com/blog/2011/05/co-driver-election-video.html