Originally posted by the.raven:no. thegood looking gene might be Dominant but the parents have heterozygous genes end up producing double recessive phenotype. then not good looking lor.
O level stuff only.Originally posted by hyuuga neji:wah... cheem ar...
heh, looks are polygenic inheritance lar, since it is determined by so many facial features, each coded by their own unique set of genes and continuous variation too. Not monogenic like got ear, no ear kinda thing.Originally posted by the.raven:no. thegood looking gene might be Dominant but the parents have heterozygous genes end up producing double recessive phenotype. then not good looking lor.
Tell that to the government.. otherwise why are they encouraging grads to marry each other and have as many children as possible?Originally posted by arse-fan:It will go back to the same arguement that smart parents will have smart children![]()
There is no truth in either statements
Originally posted by arse-fan:Agreed.
[b]It will go back to the same arguement that smart parents will have smart children![]()
There is no truth in either statements
I am talking in terms of the most basic what, and people already say cheem.Originally posted by cornyfish2000:heh, looks are polygenic inheritance lar, since it is determined by so many facial features, each coded by their own unique set of genes and continuous variation too. Not monogenic like got ear, no ear kinda thing.![]()
Originally posted by cornyfish2000:They can encourage, form SDU, organise campaigns, but more and more graduates are staying single.
Tell that to the government.. otherwise why are they encouraging grads to marry each other and have as many children as possible?