Thanks..Originally posted by dragg:this is the 1st time i agree with you.
an agreement made between a couple in the form of a contract prior to marriage.Originally posted by snowmaiden:can anyone in short tell me more abt pre-nuptial agreement? Thanx!![]()
e.g.Originally posted by snowmaiden:and what's in the agreement? example like?
not really true. if you are very rich you will be concerned that the woman is marrying you only for the money. upon divorce you could lose up to half your assets.Originally posted by hyuuga neji:finally...
a sensible thread from caramon...
though i feel pre nup should be made legal...
maybe something should be done to discourage it...
why get married and be prepared to be divorces at the same time?
Thats the reason why many rich man refuse to marry once they are past their prime.. better to get paid sex.. less trouble and inexpensive..Originally posted by dragg:not really true. if you are very rich you will be concerned that the woman is marrying you only for the money. upon divorce you could lose up to half your assets.
pre-nup or no pre-nup isn't it our local law to provide maintenance to the wife?Originally posted by dragg:not really true. if you are very rich you will be concerned that the woman is marrying you only for the money. upon divorce you could lose up to half your assets.
that's why the thread starter is asking if the women's charter should be changed.Originally posted by Newdriver:pre-nup or no pre-nup isn't it our local law to provide maintenance to the wife?
How about changing the WHOLE Judiciary system??Originally posted by dragg:that's why the thread starter is asking if the women's charter should be changed.
if you can do it....Originally posted by BITCHY_BITCH:How about changing the WHOLE Judiciary system??![]()
![]()
I did mention that the system will also cover those who abuse it maOriginally posted by dragg:but some women are also abusing it
true...Originally posted by dragg:not really true. if you are very rich you will be concerned that the woman is marrying you only for the money. upon divorce you could lose up to half your assets.
i am sure they can work something out with the court. why run away?Originally posted by av98m:There are actually jobless men who cannot afford the monthly maintenance to their ex-wives and decide to go on the run so as to escape jail.![]()
Sad isn't it? For those who can afford the monthly maintenance, their ex-wife most likely can afford to drive a car using that money..Originally posted by av98m:There are actually jobless men who cannot afford the monthly maintenance to their ex-wives and decide to go on the run so as to escape jail.![]()
Well....I dont think "a few" people are abusing it....Originally posted by elindra:I think the main problem is that when you have a charter, you protect those who need it and those who abuse it.
Ultimately it boils down to each individual and should the underprivilaged be denied help because a few people abuse it?
the men in question are obviously not very smart.Originally posted by dragg:i am sure they can work something out with the court. why run away?