i dont have it..Originally posted by Saint`:ten year series ?? look for yearly based
hang out with a group of sec 4 kids after O levels.. so you can get it easilyOriginally posted by About A GaL:i dont have it..
popular bookstore fake one ahOriginally posted by About A GaL:i dont have it..
you too bo liao issit?Originally posted by About A GaL:Wish to keep it for memory's sake....
every batch feels the same as you,don bother to think so much.Originally posted by stellazio:last year paper also damn easy..i duno why but i can't help but feel that the 1988 batch gets better benefits den the rest..
but really,my friend who retook his O level could tell the difference and bloody crap that was the first batch to take the new english syllabus and was marked so leniently..Originally posted by Takumi2eLimit:every batch feels the same as you,don bother to think so much.![]()
in 1988, i was in pri. 1......Hmm, what was with the O levels of that year?Originally posted by stellazio:last year paper also damn easy..i duno why but i can't help but feel that the 1988 batch gets better benefits den the rest..
He was talking those born in '88.Originally posted by About A GaL:in 1988, i was in pri. 1......Hmm, what was with the O levels of that year?
He's trying to say those born in 1988 not 1988 o level takers.....Originally posted by About A GaL:in 1988, i was in pri. 1......Hmm, what was with the O levels of that year?
finally someone agreesOriginally posted by kaobeikaobu:1997...the math paper i took also my turning point....kekeke![]()
no, o level was history to me in 97...Originally posted by About A GaL:finally someone agrees
Indeed! But we should not forget the past. What we are now was dependent on the pastOriginally posted by kaobeikaobu:no, o level was history to me in 97...![]()