NKF sues SPH on defamation
-
The best way to protest without real action is not to donate n see how. I scared they wanna play along n dun wanna give the kidney patient to go for treatment n a lot die due to lack of treatmet den jia lat liao.
-
Yup, i know the law (But i am NOT a lawyer). it request 5 or more to be consider unlawful assembly (NOT illegal gathering) however, this is ONLY 1 of the many Ingredients to be consider for unlawful assembly. (Ingredient - a term used in law)Originally posted by Lethargic@@:u dunnoe more than a certain amount of ppl is considered illegal gathering?
n u think the president/govt would be so free to go n see the representative?
somehow...i feel tt ppl have no say/authority in any of these event...
An assembly of 5 or more persons is designated an “unlawful assembly”, if the common object of the persons composing that assembly is —
(a) to overawe by criminal force, or show of criminal force, the Legislative or Executive Government, or any public servant in the exercise of the lawful power of such public servant;
(b) to resist the execution of any law, or of any legal process;
(c) to commit any mischief or criminal trespass, or other offence;
(d) by means of criminal force, or show of criminal force, to any person, to take or obtain possession of any property, or to deprive any person of the enjoyment of a right of way, or of the use of water or other incorporeal right of which he is in possession or enjoyment, or to enforce any right or supposed right; or
(e) by means of criminal force, or show of criminal force, to compel any person to do what he is not legally bound to do, or to omit to do what he is legally entitled to do.
Therefore, as long as we are NOT doing the above, it would be perfectly OK. which i think gathering public opinion/petition for a good cause would be OK.
I might be wrong
-
-
Originally posted by prelude95:
Do we have a truly impartial judiciary to back us up here?
Yup, i know the law (But i am NOT a lawyer). it request 5 or more to be consider unlawful assembly (NOT illegal gathering) however, this is ONLY 1 of the many [b]Ingredients to be consider for unlawful assembly. (Ingredient - a term used in law)
An assembly of 5 or more persons is designated an “unlawful assembly”, if the common object of the persons composing that assembly is —
(a) to overawe by criminal force, or show of criminal force, the Legislative or Executive Government, or any public servant in the exercise of the lawful power of such public servant;
(b) to resist the execution of any law, or of any legal process;
(c) to commit any mischief or criminal trespass, or other offence;
(d) by means of criminal force, or show of criminal force, to any person, to take or obtain possession of any property, or to deprive any person of the enjoyment of a right of way, or of the use of water or other incorporeal right of which he is in possession or enjoyment, or to enforce any right or supposed right; or
(e) by means of criminal force, or show of criminal force, to compel any person to do what he is not legally bound to do, or to omit to do what he is legally entitled to do.
Therefore, as long as we are NOT doing the above, it would be perfectly OK. which i think gathering public opinion/petition for a good cause would be OK.
I might be wrong [/b] -
Originally posted by prelude95:
Yup, i know the law (But i am NOT a lawyer). it request 5 or more to be consider unlawful assembly (NOT illegal gathering) however, this is ONLY 1 of the many [b]Ingredients to be consider for unlawful assembly. (Ingredient - a term used in law)
An assembly of 5 or more persons is designated an “unlawful assembly”, if the common object of the persons composing that assembly is —
(a) to overawe by criminal force, or show of criminal force, the Legislative or Executive Government, or any public servant in the exercise of the lawful power of such public servant;
(b) to resist the execution of any law, or of any legal process;
(c) to commit any mischief or criminal trespass, or other offence;
(d) by means of criminal force, or show of criminal force, to any person, to take or obtain possession of any property, or to deprive any person of the enjoyment of a right of way, or of the use of water or other incorporeal right of which he is in possession or enjoyment, or to enforce any right or supposed right; or
(e) by means of criminal force, or show of criminal force, to compel any person to do what he is not legally bound to do, or to omit to do what he is legally entitled to do.
Therefore, as long as we are NOT doing the above, it would be perfectly OK. which i think gathering public opinion/petition for a good cause would be OK.
I might be wrong [/b]
ah well...laws can be in the grey areas too... 
-
tHATS my blog your reading!Originally posted by LazerLordz: -
Originally posted by prelude95:
i think (e) tiok cos trying to use show of force to compel someone to do something that not legally bound to do.
Yup, i know the law (But i am NOT a lawyer). it request 5 or more to be consider unlawful assembly (NOT illegal gathering) however, this is ONLY 1 of the many [b]Ingredients to be consider for unlawful assembly. (Ingredient - a term used in law)
An assembly of 5 or more persons is designated an “unlawful assembly”, if the common object of the persons composing that assembly is —
(a) to overawe by criminal force, or show of criminal force, the Legislative or Executive Government, or any public servant in the exercise of the lawful power of such public servant;
(b) to resist the execution of any law, or of any legal process;
(c) to commit any mischief or criminal trespass, or other offence;
(d) by means of criminal force, or show of criminal force, to any person, to take or obtain possession of any property, or to deprive any person of the enjoyment of a right of way, or of the use of water or other incorporeal right of which he is in possession or enjoyment, or to enforce any right or supposed right; or
(e) by means of criminal force, or show of criminal force, to compel any person to do what he is not legally bound to do, or to omit to do what he is legally entitled to do.
Therefore, as long as we are NOT doing the above, it would be perfectly OK. which i think gathering public opinion/petition for a good cause would be OK.
I might be wrong [/b]
(c) sounds very vague i hope they defined it legally sufficiently
anyway there is somethign called ISA where they can just catch pple and lock them up for 10 years or more for fun without any justification -
Originally posted by hisoka:i think (e) tiok cos trying to use show of force to compel someone to do something that not legally bound to do.
(c) sounds very vague i hope they defined it legally sufficiently
anyway there is somethign called ISA where they can just catch pple and lock them up for 10 years or more for fun without any justification imprison for fun!!! -
http://business-times.asia1.com.sg/sub/specialfocus/story/0,4574,162209,00.html?
Questioning Mr Durai on his curriculum vitae, Mr Singh asked about the director fees he earned but not disclosed while being a full-time CEO of NKF. Mr Durai said he was a director of Amcol Holdings from 1992 to 1996, for which he was paid fees of $25,000 a year. He was a director of Overseas & General for a couple of years, for which he was also paid $25,000 a year. For TV12, he was paid a nominal sum.
25k to 600k per year
'Your CV is yet another illustration of the lack of transparency with which you operate. You do not come clean on what you do, you do not tell the board what you do, how much you earn, you do not tell the board about your commercial relationship with a person who has a contract with the NKF,' Mr Singh said.
2400% increase pay rise.... you kick me, u squeeze my balls
i also refuse to leave -
yeah yeah.. bite my kahunas.Originally posted by SMAPLionHeart:tHATS my blog your reading! -
wahhahahhahahhahahaOriginally posted by LazerLordz:
wtf, i almost fell on the floor man
this is good stuff -
True, but with a million of people from the public backing you for this good cause, i dont think they govt would be "daring" enough to do anything. it would be as good as many enemies with 1 million of singaporean.Originally posted by Lethargic@@: ah well...laws can be in the grey areas too...
The 1 million votes (during election) would have a much heavier weight than NKF.
again, i might be wrong
Just my 2 cents worth of thought. -
i'll get dogs to do that for uOriginally posted by LazerLordz:yeah yeah.. bite my kahunas. -
ROFL , now government arms are biting each other..
SPH indirectly sparred with GCT wife liao
hohoho
-
Originally posted by prelude95:True, but with a million of people from the public backing you for this good cause, i dont think they govt would be "daring" enough to do anything. it would be as good as many enemies with 1 million of singaporean.
The 1 million votes (during election) would have a much heavier weight than NKF.
again, i might be wrong
Just my 2 cents worth of thought. -
Problem with 1 million..its easier to find them "pang seh" you than turn up.Originally posted by Lethargic@@: -
actually top news of the month should be the china gal who kena murder & huang na~the small gal who was also murder...
but now everyone is goning nuts about NKF...
i said"NKF sure deserve a Good Rating"
-
the huang na case is peanuts compared to nkf caseOriginally posted by shenjunjie:actually top news of the month should be the china gal who kena murder & huang na~the small gal who was also murder...
but now everyone is goning nuts about NKF...
i said"NKF sure deserve a Good Rating" -
there might not even have a place big enuff to accomodate 1 million ppl...Originally posted by LazerLordz:Problem with 1 million..its easier to find them "pang seh" you than turn up. -
NKF=No Kidney Fuckoff
-
Mr Singh referred to evidence that showed Mr Durai has the use of a car from NKF's pool of eight cars, which come with an accompanying corps of drivers.
can i be the driver? I dont think there are so many VIP to visit NKF everyday
Mr Singh also said that besides using an NKF car Mr Durai has his own private car - a Mercedes Benz - which he paid for.
'Who uses that car?' asked Mr Singh. 'Your wife?'
'Yes,' said Mr Durai. He said NKF paid for road tax, maintenance and repairs on the vehicle.
Do you think Durai want me to be his 'kuay kia' (godson)?
'Therefore, over and above your salary and your bonuses ... you have available to you a fleet of cars and a group of drivers, which you can use for both business and personal reasons, and over and above that, you have a car at home which the NKF pays for in relation to road tax, repairs and maintenance,' said Mr Singh.
He went on: 'The donations which are given from the public are also used to pay for the maintenance and road tax for a Mercedes-Benz for your wife.'
At least our money not used as toilet paper. Our $$ are used for a cause at least. Behind every successful man, there exist a woman. This woman make him happy, then Durai can 'work' and 'plan' more efficiently and smartly to bring in more benefits for the patients
Mr Durai responded: 'These are my entitlements and I use them
knn.. can you readers stop being stupid? Who wouldnt pick up that 50 dollars on the floor?Lets not waste it. After all, I came up with these proposal call 'NKF's Director Entitlements'. This is a good proposal. I dont come up with good ideas for nothing. I'm paid to do so okie! Muwahaha... like that black and white on the paper, you NOOBS cannot say i sipon money from the organisation. Go drink more milk b4 u try to convict me. Muwahahaha....... -
or he could be in NKF office but handling his other businesses... using NKF timeOriginally posted by ShellFish:So What if he saids that he work 12 to 13 hours in the office. Maybe he just don't like to see the F+++ wife and stay at office, suffing porn. 
see this :
First, the business relationships Mr Durai had with NKF board member Ms Matilda Chua.
These were through two companies - Proton Web Solutions, a call centre operations based in India, which NKF had contracted its tele-marketing work to - and Global Net, in which Mr Durai himself had a stake.
Mr Durai also said he had held several directorships in addition to his work as CEO of the NKF.
Asked if he had informed the NKF Board of these appointments, he replied that it was not consequential and the Board gave him the liberty to do so. -
Shin Min Daily News estimated that the legal fees will amount to a 6-digit figure. I wonder if the money will be taken from public donation. If so, it will really be a shame: donors have to "pay" a 6-digit sum to find out how their money has been mis-managed.
-
hehe. thats a reality of life, accept it broOriginally posted by greencoral:Shin Min Daily News estimated that the legal fees will amount to a 6-digit figure. I wonder if the money will be taken from public donation. If so, it will really be a shame: donors have to "pay" a 6-digit sum to find out how their money has been mis-managed.
-
imagine people keep dialing the hotlines u see the figure jump by 100,200,300 when finally reach 600,000.oh great its just enough to pay durai's salary..