dumbster...Originally posted by coffeeortea:cool.. i'd choose speed over comfort
Why is it so?Originally posted by Devil1976:The SEX PERVERTS are gonna be VERY HAPPY about this...
The NEXT suggestion I give is for the buses to be specified for EACH gender.Originally posted by Devil1976:The SEX PERVERTS are gonna be VERY HAPPY about this...
IMAGINE a BUS, SQUEEZED and PACKED SO CLOSELY... No one's sitting... All's eye levels' much above the shoulder... You can hardly tell who did what, where..?Originally posted by iveco:Why is it so?![]()
i believe wat he meant is that standing bus can fit in more ppl, therefore waiting time is cut shorter..thats what he meant by speedOriginally posted by mach10:dumbster...
Stand-only means the bus have to go slower... use ur brains can?
I think you should take a trip down to the BAR..? Provided that you're ABOVE 18 that is..??Originally posted by iveco:Why is it so?![]()
Not masacre all the senior citizens only... The bus might even turn over much easier if it travels too fast? Know why passengers ain't allow to stand at the top level of double-decker buses?Originally posted by mach10:dumbster...
Stand-only means the bus have to go slower... use ur brains can?
plus unless u masacre all the senior citizens... even then, u still have people who are disabled to board the bus... how?
Originally posted by soulness:i believe wat he meant is that standing bus can fit in more ppl, therefore waiting time is cut shorter..thats what he meant by speed
dunno who never use brain?
Originally posted by Devil1976:You referring to downblouse incidents right? But bear in mind, in a standing only bus, you can't see gals in micro-minis zaogeng cos they aren't sitting.
I think you should take a trip down to the [b]BAR..? Provided that you're ABOVE 18 that is..??[/b]
are you fu cking stupid? i just said i prefer speed over comfort.. im not comparing stand-only buses and normal buses. i was merely making a statement and i have not taken any sides. first of all, who said that there must only be stand-only buses? cant there be both? i suppose you are too poor to even take public transport because you havent stood in normal buses before? i have never seen anyone fall or have trouble standing on normal buses.Originally posted by mach10:dumbster...
Stand-only means the bus have to go slower... use ur brains can?
plus unless u masacre all the senior citizens... even then, u still have people who are disabled to board the bus... how?
The stand-only suggestion for buses is out of the question.Originally posted by Farmer Brown:some of you people seriously need counselling. The dude's suggesting a pretty good idea to ease peak hour bus problems.. and here you guys start talking about giving perverts more opportunities to grope and touch. I shan't even bother addressing that.
I think standing-only buses have potential. But they should only apply to routes that are usually taken by the able bodied, which is something quite hard to accomplish. Howabout if you added maybe a row or two of seats meant only for children, senior citizens, pregnant women.. and basically people who REALLY need to sit down. These buses should only operate during peak periods and should CONCURRENTLY operate routes with normal buses giving people a choice of taking either type. Or how about if these buses had foldable seats?
All this can only be accomplished when Singaporeans start living more civic minded lifestyles. Do you think we're ready for that?
actually most passengers are selfish and everyone will rushed for comfortable seats. even you think of old people, handicaft and pregnant women, dun think they can get the seats either.Originally posted by BillyBong:The stand-only suggestion for buses is out of the question.
Why? You have to consider the senior citizens. They can't handle sustained standing because of weak legs...common sense.
What most of Europe and developed countries do is to minimise the seatings on a bus, leaving only seats for old people. The rest are given plenty of room for standing. Capacity per bus can increase and turnaround per person is faster at bus stops.
And on the topic of perverts, i think that's a reasonable issue that has to be addressed. Voyeurs will surely take advantage of cramp conditions. Just look at the situation on MRT trains. People nowadays have to get involved in making citizen's arrests if necessary to protect the interest of others, especially since the majority of replies in this thread are obviously male, who have no inkling of how females feel about leering and close encounters of the perverted kind.
As society progresses, we hope that the people progress with it. Already i see people readily giving up seats on buses and trains. Of course there are those fair number who suffer from sudden and instant attacks of the Z-monster and ignore the old and pregnant.Originally posted by 798:actually most passengers are selfish and everyone will rushed for comfortable seats. even you think of old people, handicaft and pregnant women, dun think they can get the seats either.
you realli think the bus driver care, he's the only one sitting lehz then..Originally posted by mach10:dumbster...
Stand-only means the bus have to go slower... use ur brains can?
I look forward to the day where singaporeans hv to pay "walking tax" to walk on the streets....Originally posted by dragg:the relevant authorities will only twist and turn your suggestions into another price hike.