Originally posted by caleb_chiang:
Hmm... hard to tell you know... cause waves according to knowledge, travelled in circulated patterns...
So it is quite possible for deep sea creatures been swept from deep down in the sea and circulated in the wave patterns until it breaks (aka the high waves)....
Could be...
i'll refute even a "could be" on several grounds:
1) such creatures live in excess of as much as 10 km below the sea. The tsunami, even if it were 100m tall, would pale in comparism to that sort of depth, as such, it is highly unlikely that the tsunami would be able to disturb creatures who live this far down
2) tsunamis are very shallow while far from shore and thus largely unable to cause any deep sea disturbance to these creatures. depths in the oceans of several km are mostly found far off shore, and knowing the geology of the affected area, we can safely say that there are no deep underwater areas near any of the shores, so it would be impossible for any wave near shore to have disturbed any deep sea environment. far out at sea, even a tsunami like the one in december barely disturbed ships, pleasure craft and divers out at sea, it is highly doubtful it could have reached all the way several km down and washed such creatures up.
3) normally creatures of the deep do not get washed up, they usually decompse at the bottom and become nutrients for other creatures of the deep. so it is almost impossible that any remains have been swept up and then circulated in the wave patterns until it could be wash ashore by the tsunami. besides, the specimens in the pictures look relatively fresh, and certainly do not look like remains which have been dead for a period of time b4 being washed ashore.
so according to knowledge, it is quite IMPOSSIBLE for deep sea creatures to have been swept from deep down in the sea and circulated in the wave patterns until it breaks.