Superstar
-
You all think among the gers who look nice? I think Silver is cute got chubby cheeks got dimples very cute. Candyce too skinny like those Jolin Tsai category. That msia ger eyes not that nice but meaty meaty. That Kelly song good but then I find her a bit too tall and somehow I find her face not so cute.
So what you all think?
-
candyce looks a bit like jolin.
i prefer kelly. she has the look of a star. -
me too ..
Prefer Kelly - she have the look of superstar -
kelly definitely has my vote for talent...
btw: jason's performance so sub-standard also can go in...
no wonder that wei cong cry until like dat...wei cong can sing better n looks better without a doubt man...
-
candyce is te most chio..kelly oso pretty,if not how to be cabin crew of plane?
kelly has the whole package....looks+talent -
Superstar is not defined by their song singing talent alone. To business, it is about whether can sell records make a lot of money or not. If Kelly can sing but still cannot lure money from ppl, she is not a star. To me a star is one who can lure ppl money out of their wallet or purse. You see Kelly need to be in Revival round to survive prove my point.
It is about money in this world. Look at current singers not all can sing well but most who can lure money from customers are snapped up by record companies. Let's be realistic. In this world money TALKS BIG TIME!!!!! Talents are for topic to talk for shiok only lah...... -
even after ur definition of a star i still kelly fits the bill best....the rest r lackin in one way or another...
-
even after ur definition of a star i still kelly fits the bill best....the rest r lackin in one way or another...
But Kelly need to be in revival round means no ppl wanna give money to make her into finals. This is key indicator. You see the judges during revival round, they purposely give her very high score and others low score in an attempt to get her into the finals. No doubt she got the singing talent but if she is unable to draw money from ppl it is a tough decision for the record companies also -
i personally prefer kelly. didnt know she came back from the revival round.Originally posted by aiki_gal:even after ur definition of a star i still kelly fits the bill best....the rest r lackin in one way or another...
since that is the case i bet candyce has a better chance. -
didn't u know? the revival round (i suspect) were especially made for derrick n kelly... more or less the organisers know they sure can make it wan...if not the telcos cannot make extra money ma...knowing that their favourite superstar in revival/survival round those fans sure sms like xiao ah...bling$ bling$...derrick appeals very much to aunties with deep pockets with his boy boy looks n kelly with the sweet girl nxt door look....
-
wonder will anybody buy the records of yesterday's m1... duno how he got through....
-
kelly no looks but best singer
-
Originally posted by sohguanh:Superstar is not defined by their song singing talent alone. To business, it is about whether can sell records make a lot of money or not. If Kelly can sing but still cannot lure money from ppl, she is not a star. To me a star is one who can lure ppl money out of their wallet or purse. You see Kelly need to be in Revival round to survive prove my point.
It is about money in this world. Look at current singers not all can sing well but most who can lure money from customers are snapped up by record companies. Let's be realistic. In this world money TALKS BIG TIME!!!!! Talents are for topic to talk for shiok only lah...... 
-
then why u ppl vote through SMS not like in USA one
can see our vote jumping one. -
So you all think which Superstar gers look nice? Silver? Candyce? I think Silver cheeks fleshy got dimples eyes big much nicer but then I think she more tanned lookin than Candyce. Kelly must put powder then look nice but I find she wear skirts or dress stand very ugly. Legs open big big think she quite used to wearing jeans hence no adopt close legs approach when wear skirts