history experts needed!!

• derekho

  16 Aug 05, 18:25

  i am having a debate in school in a few days time... i am the opposition team and the motion is "the policy of appeasement is to be blame for WW2"
  i need help in coming up with points, a useful website will be good.
  thanks alot!
• BÃ¥seline

  16 Aug 05, 18:29

  I did a Google search and there looks like some leads for you. See if it's relevant to you.
  
  HERE
• ditzy

  16 Aug 05, 18:35

  Originally posted by BÃ¥seline:

  I did a Google search and there looks like some leads for you. See if it's relevant to you.
  
  HERE

  Oh, here we go again.
• MidiLand

  16 Aug 05, 18:39

  Hey there, took history for O level..
  If i'm nt wrong there are 7 reasons for the cause of WW2..
  Appeasement, nazi-soviet pact, Rise of hitler, Failure or league of nationReluctatnt leaders between freance and britain
• BÃ¥seline

  16 Aug 05, 18:50

  Originally posted by ditzy:

  Oh, here we go again.

  
• TwinTurbo_Supra

  16 Aug 05, 19:09

  Originally posted by derekho:

  i am having a debate in school in a few days time... i am the opposition team and the motion is "the policy of appeasement is to be blame for WW2"
  i need help in coming up with points, a useful website will be good.
  thanks alot!

  check your txtbook lah. u sec 3 izit?
• Gedanken

  16 Aug 05, 19:13

  Damn, you've got a tough job there, kiddo.
  
  Have a look at this: http://members.tripod.com/~leavis/ww2.html. personally I think the argument's weak, but then again, I am and have always been anti-Appeasement.
• Griffie

  16 Aug 05, 19:28

  the actual fact is Hitler's Aggression that is the main cause....appeacement is just making it worse... (remember..... Poland is the first territory Hitler had to use troops....and it was the one that started the war....France and Britain declared war with Nazi Germany during the invasion of Poland....thus starting the 2nd world war...)
  
  so i think that Hitler's aggression is to be blamed more than the policy of appeacement....
  
  P.S. Both should be blamed for the start of the war....just that Aggression is worse....
  
  wish that this helped....
• StarPuppy

  16 Aug 05, 19:32

  actually its quite simple....
  
  1st para: Yes, because (state reasons on the appeasemnt(
  
  2nd para: However to a certain extent -diffrent factors(find from ur book)
  
  3nd paragraph: (conclusion)...u think which one the policy or the factors
  
• StarPuppy

  16 Aug 05, 19:33

  ~dp~
• c0ol_blu3z

  16 Aug 05, 19:42

  policy of appeasement is to be blame...
  
  hilter gain confident
  ... sudentaland..
  ...able to rearm- raise in army size
  ...taking back rheinland.... increase in production of war materail
• vito_corleone

  16 Aug 05, 20:20

  that doesnt sound like history, that sounds more like one of MOE's inflexible propaganda subjects.
• skyfoo

  16 Aug 05, 20:28

  Originally posted by derekho:

  i am having a debate in school in a few days time... i am the opposition team and the motion is "the policy of appeasement is to be blame for WW2"
  i need help in coming up with points, a useful website will be good.
  thanks alot!

  ha, that's my history test qn in sec 4. so u dun agree with the statement? can argue alot. best is without the actions and attitude of hitler, appeasement wouldnt take place at all.
• the.raven

  16 Aug 05, 23:19

  Originally posted by derekho:

  i am having a debate in school in a few days time... i am the opposition team and the motion is "the policy of appeasement is to be blame for WW2"
  i need help in coming up with points, a useful website will be good.
  thanks alot!

  do your own homework.