And vice-versa but i would think it is more likely that the poor man will be the one who will "dream about or see on television."Originally posted by Northwind:Your life-experience is and will be very much different from theirs...And you will know things, and be able to do things, and understand things, that those other people can only dream about or see on television...This I promise you...
Just because its not as evident doesnt mean the "poor" dun take their parents money.Originally posted by Sleeping Forest:I c a lot of young adults driving posh cars bought wif their parents money.Tts much worse.Grown up liao till $ucking their parents blood.
ppl nowdays cant take hardship and aint as hardwking as b4
The spoilled child is "spoilled", meaning he easily has what he wants. When problems in life are encountered, the support group - family, friends, etc. is either usually also spoilled, or at least of the same economic class, that being "rich" or whatever.Originally posted by samadhi_fire:And vice-versa but i would think it is more likely that the poor man will be the one who will "dream about or see on television."
maybe our SLAPPY is one such example.......Originally posted by Mr Soh:the rich kids will grow up with no values, morality and worst no brains.
Those who have been driven around as a kid in a Porsche and also have walked with but a penny in their pocket, know both sides of the coin and are better in anticipating situations..Originally posted by Northwind:The spoilled child is "spoilled", meaning he easily has what he wants. When problems in life are encountered, the support group - family, friends, etc. is either usually also spoilled, or at least of the same economic class, that being "rich" or whatever.
The poor child, on the other hand, when faced with difficult life situations, does not have the answers and solutions so easy. For the solution, the poor individual has to be creative, has to use strategy, and definitely learns a greater appreciation of friendship, etc. when he is given help.
And I stand by the television statement. Obviously, I am not talking about the opportunity to travel to far and distant lands or whatever you may be hinting at.
What I am talking about is that the poor man knows the inside of a restraunt kitchen, the poor man can know places in the "inner city" that the rich man would never go into.
The poor guy and the rich guy can both be only about money-chasing. But the poor man will be the one who can change his status, and know both worlds. The poor man will be be the one more quick to feel when something is amiss, or more quick to recognize depth to a situation.
I agree to an extent. Sometimes the poor can take from the poor. I am not saying that "poor people are best" type of thing.Originally posted by Uncle_MooMoo:Just because its not as evident doesnt mean the "poor" dun take their parents money.
And are the poor definitely more harworking than the "rich kids?" Be more objective instead of a sourgrape.
Exactly!Originally posted by LazerLordz:Those who have been driven around as a kid in a Porsche and also have walked with but a penny in their pocket, know both sides of the coin and are better in anticipating situations..
sorry to say but this is just not practical thinking... if u think this way, then u urself shd minimize all ur luxury and donated to the third world countries to justify ur words. who knows his parents might have already donated alot and u can't expect them to live like poor people and donate all their excess to others.Originally posted by Texcoco II:And to top this shit off, he spent FOUR HUNDRED FUCKING DOLLARS ON 7 DOZEN COOKIES! How wrong is that? That money could've gone to save the lives of a few kids in third world Africa, but he drops it on FUCKING COOKIES! Can you imagine eating an five dollar fucking cookie!?
just toss a few jay CDs to them and they can survive liaoz~!!Originally posted by WiNtEr'SkiLL:these kids duno what is hardship
really need them to stay in africa for a month
see how they survive, die also nvm