Hmm.. Just something to ponder upon.. "The absence of future presence denies the theory of time travelling"
What exactly do you mean by time travelling? If you mean time as in the time you have on your hands like 1 hour of soccer, 2 hours of studying, 5 hours of sleeping, it sounds feasible. Have you guys slept for like 5 hours and it just seems like 15 minutes? There you go! You have just time travelled. You have pass 5 hours in 15 minutes. It is the perception of the human mind. In the time of 2 hours, A plays soccer and enjoyed himself whereas B sits down on a chair and stare at his watch. To A, 2 hours of soccer had just passed very fast whereas to B 2 hours of staring at the watch is so slow he could just die. Imagine the seconds passing by which goes to minutes then to the hour. Time travelling? In a way right?
Planet A and Planet B are 2 light years apart which means it would take 2 years travelling at the light of speed to reach from planet A to planet B. Ok. Now, 1 Jan 2000, an explosion occured on Planet B. On 1 Jan 2002, someone on planet A will start to see the explosion on Planet B which was supposedly to occur 2 years ago. Occurence of any time travelling?
Photographs of the past. Time travelling?
It is all the perception of the human minds. What we see is being processed in our minds to give us the verdict. We will never be physically in the past, but a machine can be built in future to tap into our minds and play around with our past experiences and make us virtually go back into our past. Sensors all over our body to stimulate our nerves in a way so as to simulate the actions we want to do and "feel" in the virtual dream. Something like the matrix. That means our nerves and mind can be stimulated such that it feels like we are eating an apple but in physical we are not. Think wet dreams.
Ok I think I might drift away a bit from the topic but what the hell haha something to think about..
