+1Originally posted by nullifi3d:you think the women of SG are so free to debate over something that may never happen? They got better things to do like get their nails done and find a new bf ever weekend.
Originally posted by seow:Outdated lar.
Now the "in" topic is on how sucky singaporean men are.![]()
Yes, like, "what would you do if you have a cheebye."Originally posted by DriftingGuy:So many topics on guys serve NS very siong girls should also blah blah..
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=135723
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=133466
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=131615
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=185854
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=37471
http://www.sgforums.com/?action=thread_display&thread_id=7106
Even bar has more creativity than this![]()
![]()
Expected you to say when guys be come gays....Originally posted by FireIce:i think it's good
tts when boys become men
den gals will bcome women if they serve ns la???Originally posted by FireIce:i think it's good
tts when boys become men
Not sure about that, but sure save money from slimming courses.Originally posted by tt3:den gals will bcome women if they serve ns la???
think it's unfair to girls if you say girls don't have to serve NS while guys slog their heart out. Girls can be physically fit, but girls have a weaker physical fitness as compared to guys. I think this arguement won't end as long as NS is present. Give us girls a break.I never say girls must go combat what. I agree that girls are generally less fit.
No wonder singapore lack of women... all little girls never go through NSOriginally posted by FireIce:i think it's good
tts when boys become men
Originally posted by zhjjhz888:If u consider SPF and SCDF to be para-military forces, then it ok... But the way u write, seems to say NS is limited to the SAF ... Then how can girls actually make a reasonable comment on such a topic ???
2 yrs [b]national service (effectively is military service) [/b]
i juz can't c the relation in giving birth n makin it mandatory for girls to b included in the enlistment act...Originally posted by zhjjhz888:okay most guys go SAF, some go police and scdf..but the point is I think the Enlistment Act is not very fair to guys. Girls are also citizens why no need serve NS. NS not only restricted to combat or uniformed services. They can serve for example in hospitals as nurses , in Ministries as clerks or receptionists.
Girls always say give birth v siong..But they have a choice not to give birth. Not serving NS is a serious offence under Enlistment Act, penalty is jail. Girls nv give birth will they be imprisoned at Detention Barracks?
As for the issue about maternal leave can disrupt work , it is a 1-time event. But reservist is 10-20 years affair. Giving birth is 9-month affair (include the discomfort exp. during pregnancy) but NS is about 2 years more than 24 months.
I do not expect NS to be abolished due to the defence needs of the nation but I expect the guys to be either compensated or make the girls contribute in their ways too. ( Dont mention giving birth etc as they are not mandatory by law)
Because you girls keep associating giving birth to NS. I quote someone mentioning "Would us guys rather give birth than serve NS" countless of times.Originally posted by alwaysdisturbed:i juz can't c the relation in giving birth n makin it mandatory for girls to b included in the enlistment act...
So millions of boys in e world remain boys lahOriginally posted by FireIce:i think it's good
tts when boys become men