If have BA, me will take BA...Originally posted by holden:Which airline would you recommend for someone going on exchange in London for a year? Both cost btw 1450 - 1500 inclusive of tax. Thai offers 30kg baggage for students but Qantas has only 23kg. Is the 7kg difference vital for a student spending a year abroad?
Take Thai got to transit 3 hours in Bangkok, Qantas direct to London. There's a fear of flight delay while transitting at Bangkok. Furthermore my impression is that Qantas has superior in flight entertainment; Thai shows all the crap movies like 15 Blocks.
There was this case I heard from a pal working in BA, one of their flights had to do a last min transit coz they were scrimping on fuel.Originally posted by dork3d:If have BA, me will take BA...
thai movies I like I like....Originally posted by holden:Which airline would you recommend for someone going on exchange in London for a year? Both cost btw 1450 - 1500 inclusive of tax. Thai offers 30kg baggage for students but Qantas has only 23kg. Is the 7kg difference vital for a student spending a year abroad?
Take Thai got to transit 3 hours in Bangkok, Qantas direct to London. There's a fear of flight delay while transitting at Bangkok. Furthermore my impression is that Qantas has superior in flight entertainment; Thai shows all the crap movies like 15 Blocks.
i will choose quantas.. cos i don fancy transitting.. defintely will have flight delay.. to me 23 kg is more than enough.. don tik i nid to carry lots of stuff there..Originally posted by holden:Which airline would you recommend for someone going on exchange in London for a year? Both cost btw 1450 - 1500 inclusive of tax. Thai offers 30kg baggage for students but Qantas has only 23kg. Is the 7kg difference vital for a student spending a year abroad?
Take Thai got to transit 3 hours in Bangkok, Qantas direct to London. There's a fear of flight delay while transitting at Bangkok. Furthermore my impression is that Qantas has superior in flight entertainment; Thai shows all the crap movies like 15 Blocks.
correction.Originally posted by Wanda:Thai air has nice food, warm service and pleasant-looking air stewards and stewardess. But BKK airport has nothing much to do for 3 hrs.![]()
Then Quantas wins my vote, and usually western airlines serves better mocktails and drinks.Originally posted by TehJarVu:i enjoyed qantas' inflight entertainment... better than SIA
becos for qantas, after your 1st movie and you switch to another movie... it starts from the beginning... whereas for SIA the movies all run concurrently... after your first movie and you move to your second movie... you have to watch it from eg. 45th minutes etc... very luan..
You are suay, the SIA flight I took, I could FF and RW movies for all I care.Originally posted by TehJarVu:i enjoyed qantas' inflight entertainment... better than SIA
becos for qantas, after your 1st movie and you switch to another movie... it starts from the beginning... whereas for SIA the movies all run concurrently... after your first movie and you move to your second movie... you have to watch it from eg. 45th minutes etc... very luan..
RW'ing a movie which is oredi into its 45th min takes a long time... qantas entertainment units when they say they are 'personal' they are really 'personal'... will start the movie only when u start it..Originally posted by ditzy:You are suay, the SIA flight I took, I could FF and RW movies for all I care.![]()
Wah bitter tongue.Originally posted by gohkatkat:i definitely go for thai airways.....the flight on qantas sucks.....not to mention the air of arrogance their ugly flight attendants display.......btw....their flight hostess and flight stewards look like those ugly old hags.......how come qantas hire such old folks as their cabin crew????? so old......and ugly looking......scarecrow lor..........never want to take qantas......furthermore their food is so bland tasting............not like swiss air or some other flight airlines like SIA........
