empire of the sun
-
Once AGAIN !! Japan has reveal its fox tail !!!
Japan has every intention to make a come back to conquer the world, their evil intention is made known AGAIN !
But, this time round, they are disguising it and the Japs are trying to garner support from US to realize their century old ambition !!
We must not let Japan succeed this time !! North Korea should do more missile testing by firing them nearer to the military coast of Japan !!
FCUK THE JAPANESE !! FCUK THEIR AV GIRLS !!! BUT MOST IMPORTANT MUST FCUK THEIR AV GIRLS !!!
-
WORLD WAR 4??
-
-
today's weather very sunny and hot
-
Another chance to +1 before close and ban?
-
Patriotic! As Chinese we must avenge our ancestors, fcuk their AV girls!
-
Nuts !!!
-
It's 3Originally posted by Princess livia:
WORLD WAR 4?? 
-
i always thought world war 3 was the one which was eventually settled by the mass banning of clones.Originally posted by polarsnake:It's 3 -
middle east in war right now
-
Originally posted by polarsnake:It's 3
paiseh la..mie dunnno ma.. -
Heh?!
Nice topic.
+1
Cheers.
C.K -
If there is a world war 3, the world cup will be won by Uruguay. They were the country who won the world cup right after the end of each world war. So rmb to take Uruguay as the winners
-
South Korea sharply criticized Japan on Tuesday for its discussion of a pre-emptive strike against North Korea, calling the move the "exposure of the nature of its aggression." On Monday, Japan's top officials and politicians floated the idea of staging a pre-emptive attack on missiles bases in North Korea amid the global furor over the communist state's series of missile tests last week.
"We can't help but intensely watch it, as Japan exposed the nature of its aggression," said Jung Tae-ho, a spokesman at South Korea's presidential office, Cheong Wa Dae. "In view of the historical fact Japan made a pretext of protecting its nationals residing on the Korean Peninsula before invading Korea in the past, the Japanese moves are surely serious threatening remarks to obstruct the peace on the Korean Peninsula and East Asia," he said. Korea was colonized by Japan in 1910-45, and many Koreans still harbor deep resentment toward the Japanese. In recent years, South Korea-Japan ties have plunged to their lowest ebb in decades as a result of disputes over history, territory and North Korea.
Jung also said South Korea will "sternly cope with Japanese political leaders' arrogance and reckless remarks" to exploit the North Korean missile dispute in an attempt to transform Japan into "a military powerhouse." -
If NK doesn't desist, I will also support a surgical strike against the NK leadership if they continue to lob missiles around the place.
Some of these poodles have to be put down you know.. in the past, it was easier to do the right thing. -
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Wednesday that Japan's draft U.N. resolution in response to North Korea's missile test firings contained "unacceptable elements", Interfax news agency reported.
"Japan through its official representatives has announced that all countries have to vote as Japan wants, and warns that if this does not happen, they are threatened by some kind of negative consequences," he was quoted by Interfax as saying.
"I think this is absolutely unacceptable."
Russia condemned Pyongyang's decision to test fire rockets without warning earlier this month -- a launch that outraged Japan the United States, and most other powers -- but argued against imposing sanctions on the communist state.
Japan, backed by Washington and Britain, has pushed a draft resolution that would force countries to withhold all funds, material and technology that could be used for North Korea's missile programme.
Lavrov said on Wednesday that the Security Council resolution must be "tough, but not brimming over with emotion, and in no way containing threats".
"Unfortunately, the draft resolution that was presented to the Security Council and which is now being discussed, is flawed by unacceptable elements". -
The world attention to DPRK missile tests has undergone a dramatic diversion recently. The Japanese reaction was so strong and its gesture so rigid, that the whole international community was "at a loss".
The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) and the United States have been sharply divided and are antagonistic to each other over the issue of financial sanctions against the DPRK. The DPRK missile test, in addition to military exercise, was meant to prompt the U.S. to agree to bilateral contacts. But Japan obstinately passed itself as the main target of the missile test.
Japan obviously has ulterior motives for its willingness to serve as the "target". First, to gain an upper hand in its relations with the DPRK; second, to use the event as an excuse to accelerate its building of an external-oriented military setup; third, to carry favor with the United States on the question of containing the DPRK; fourth, to seize the opportunity for a favorable turn in its pursuit of a permanent seat in the United Nations (UN) Security Council.
Japanese Defense Agency chief Fukushiro Nukaga said on July 9 that it is natural for Japan to have the capacity for a "preemptive strike". His remark was echoed by Foreign Minister Taro Aso on the same day. The following day, Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe said it is necessary for Japan to consider having the "capacity for attacking enemy bases".
As people still remember how Shinzo Abe became notorious for his hardliner stance towards the DPRK as early as in 2002, who was then followed by a handful of hawkish politicians. But recently they had to pull in their horns when Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's hard line diplomacy was driven into an impasse. The missile test, however, posed an opportunity for them to restart the race.
The grace-gaining by hawkish politicians is an outcome of prevailing neo-conservatism and neo-nationalism in Japanese society. To "demonize" the DPRK has become a means to fan up xenophobia. Any prod at the country might be "diplomatically wrong", but "politically safe and favorable in public opinion". Media say this performance of "super hardliners" was all directed by Abe. Among his cast is Kenzo Oshima, Japanese Ambassador to the United Nations, who put on an over-bearing gesture and really shocked diplomats of other countries.
The Japanese "preemptive strike" theory naturally met with opposition at home. Ichiro Ozawa, chief of the Democratic Party of Japan, said Tuesday that without being attacked (from the other side), we cannot launch attacks (on its bases). And leader of the Social Democratic Party Fukushima Mizuho said: there emerged the theory of "attacking enemy's bases" within the government at the present stage. I'm deeply concerned as it will heighten the tension in Northeast Asia.
The Japanese abnormal behaviors have also drawn negative comments from the international community. China has voiced its opposition to the Japanese "sanction draft" on the DPRK submitted to the UN Security Council, saying that it will do no good to maintaining peace and stability in Northeast Asia, to keeping the unity of the UN Security Council or to safeguarding the six-party talks. Russia is also in opposition to any act that would worsen the situation. Even the United States has stressed repeatedly on solving the crisis through diplomatic channels. The New York Times holds that Abe's remarks are meant to stir up public anger, and then to translate such public will into forces for revising the pacifist constitution.
The Republic of Korea worries more about Japan than the missile tests by DPRK. President Roh Moo-hyun said Tuesday: "The remarks by Japan's political leaders have given rise to new circumstances, and this could possibly exacerbate the situation." A spokesman for the ROK presidential office said that Japanese leasers are taking the missile test as an excuse for taking the road for military expansion. A ROK government official even said: from a historical and long-term point of view, Japan is our security threat.
The "preemptive strike" is creating a new crisis before the "missile crisis" is over. The relevant parties should be prudent and exercise cautions and take real responsibility for regional security and stability. The "preemptive strike" theory much resembles an echo of what Japanese politicians made six or seven decades ago. -
if malaysia test tired a missile singapore will be doing the same thing i assure you. no country, unless they're retarded sits by doing nothing when a threat is posed to its peopleOriginally posted by boy in blues:The world attention to DPRK missile tests has undergone a dramatic diversion recently. The Japanese reaction was so strong and its gesture so rigid, that the whole international community was "at a loss".
The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) and the United States have been sharply divided and are antagonistic to each other over the issue of financial sanctions against the DPRK. The DPRK missile test, in addition to military exercise, was meant to prompt the U.S. to agree to bilateral contacts. But Japan obstinately passed itself as the main target of the missile test.
Japan obviously has ulterior motives for its willingness to serve as the "target". First, to gain an upper hand in its relations with the DPRK; second, to use the event as an excuse to accelerate its building of an external-oriented military setup; third, to carry favor with the United States on the question of containing the DPRK; fourth, to seize the opportunity for a favorable turn in its pursuit of a permanent seat in the United Nations (UN) Security Council.
Japanese Defense Agency chief Fukushiro Nukaga said on July 9 that it is natural for Japan to have the capacity for a "preemptive strike". His remark was echoed by Foreign Minister Taro Aso on the same day. The following day, Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe said it is necessary for Japan to consider having the "capacity for attacking enemy bases".
As people still remember how Shinzo Abe became notorious for his hardliner stance towards the DPRK as early as in 2002, who was then followed by a handful of hawkish politicians. But recently they had to pull in their horns when Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's hard line diplomacy was driven into an impasse. The missile test, however, posed an opportunity for them to restart the race.
The grace-gaining by hawkish politicians is an outcome of prevailing neo-conservatism and neo-nationalism in Japanese society. To "demonize" the DPRK has become a means to fan up xenophobia. Any prod at the country might be "diplomatically wrong", but "politically safe and favorable in public opinion". Media say this performance of "super hardliners" was all directed by Abe. Among his cast is Kenzo Oshima, Japanese Ambassador to the United Nations, who put on an over-bearing gesture and really shocked diplomats of other countries.
The Japanese "preemptive strike" theory naturally met with opposition at home. Ichiro Ozawa, chief of the Democratic Party of Japan, said Tuesday that without being attacked (from the other side), we cannot launch attacks (on its bases). And leader of the Social Democratic Party Fukushima Mizuho said: there emerged the theory of "attacking enemy's bases" within the government at the present stage. I'm deeply concerned as it will heighten the tension in Northeast Asia.
The Japanese abnormal behaviors have also drawn negative comments from the international community. China has voiced its opposition to the Japanese "sanction draft" on the DPRK submitted to the UN Security Council, saying that it will do no good to maintaining peace and stability in Northeast Asia, to keeping the unity of the UN Security Council or to safeguarding the six-party talks. Russia is also in opposition to any act that would worsen the situation. Even the United States has stressed repeatedly on solving the crisis through diplomatic channels. The New York Times holds that Abe's remarks are meant to stir up public anger, and then to translate such public will into forces for revising the pacifist constitution.
The Republic of Korea worries more about Japan than the missile tests by DPRK. President Roh Moo-hyun said Tuesday: "The remarks by Japan's political leaders have given rise to new circumstances, and this could possibly exacerbate the situation." A spokesman for the ROK presidential office said that Japanese leasers are taking the missile test as an excuse for taking the road for military expansion. A ROK government official even said: from a historical and long-term point of view, Japan is our security threat.
The "preemptive strike" is creating a new crisis before the "missile crisis" is over. The relevant parties should be prudent and exercise cautions and take real responsibility for regional security and stability. The "preemptive strike" theory much resembles an echo of what Japanese politicians made six or seven decades ago. -
Precisely ,Singapore has her Forward Defense Posture, nicely labelled for a first strike policy.
It's just that we have no reason to go to the UN and force a resolution over this.