do photographers have right to keep photo if model don agree
-
I bring up
http://sgcafe.com/showpost.php?p=1354787&postcount=321
photographer takes photo of someone and posts on web. Model in photo asks him to take it down , he is rude and says it is very lucky he is willing to take it down because model has no rights to photo
please explain
if true then it is dangerous to walk down street and let photo be taken of you -
I do not know about photos being taken at random in public.
But I guess it is still wrong?
There are cases where celebrities went up to paparazis and demand and forcefully take the camera and film away from the cameraman. Intrusion of privacy is at hand here.
I guess its suppose to be the same case? I dunno... -
Should take down. Post photo yes, dont show model's face.
If you want to post, at least discuss with model first.
That's what I've heard. -
if i remember right.. yes. he can take photos and own them if he took it in public places which allows camera, and some other conditions.
and i agree. he was rude. -
Singapore does not have a Right to Publicity like the State of California.Originally posted by bangzi:I bring up
http://sgcafe.com/showpost.php?p=1354787&postcount=321
photographer takes photo of someone and posts on web. Model in photo asks him to take it down , he is rude and says it is very lucky he is willing to take it down because model has no rights to photo
please explain
if true then it is dangerous to walk down street and let photo be taken of you
Furthermore photographer owns the copyright.
So the photographer is right. -
it's the photographer's work.
-
but then if he uses the photograph to defame someone .. the victim can have a case.Originally posted by sinicker:it's the photographer's work. -
Should have the right to keep the camera too.
-
wat if photographer take this type of photo
http://sgcafe.com/showpost.php?p=1348871&postcount=275
if the model asks him to remove it but he refuse? Can report to police? -
you have right to take photograoh in public place and the photos belong to you.
-
It really depends on what the Photographer and the Model AGREED BEFORE the photos are taken.
Some models are advised to own the rights of the photo. But not many photographers agree to such terms.
As for photos taken in public, the subject in the photo have no rights to demand the photographer not to distirbute it.
UNLESS, the photograph was depicted in a manner that the subject felt his/her modesty was infringed upon or the purpose of distribution was meant to be demeaning or to serve a purpose that is deem illegal. -
Guidelines when Publishing Photographs of IndividualsOriginally posted by bangzi:I bring up
http://sgcafe.com/showpost.php?p=1354787&postcount=321
photographer takes photo of someone and posts on web. Model in photo asks him to take it down , he is rude and says it is very lucky he is willing to take it down because model has no rights to photo
please explain
if true then it is dangerous to walk down street and let photo be taken of you
Because there are many nuances to the right of privacy and publicity laws it is advisable to always obtain a written release from any individual that would be recognized in a photograph.
Obtain a release even if the individual's image will initially be used for a newsworthy purpose in the event that you may want to use the individual's photograph for other trade or commercial uses.
Don't forget that if the individual is a minor, you will need parental or guardian consent.
Make certain you caption the photograph correctly.
Be careful when cropping a photograph that you do not alter the context in which the photograph was taken.
If you decide to use a photograph without a release make certain it was obtained without trespassing on private property, that it does not violate an individual's right of privacy or publicity or that it is protected by a First Amendment use.
Releases are generally not required from people who are identifiable in a photograph of a street or public place, provided that the photograph is reasonably related to the subject matter and the identifiable people are not the focus of the photograph. An example of a permitted use would be a photograph of the Rockefeller Center Ice Rink that was used to illustrate a book about Rockefeller Center or about New York City attractions, even though many people may be identifiable. -
i allow photographers to keep my pix but must ask me permission before distribution or post on public domain
(and i wonder why they want to keep my pix for.) -
depends on whether a contract was signed or not.