Man robs woman in front of police

• lpx88

  14 Aug 06, 17:53

  10 dollars
• dragg

  14 Aug 06, 18:09

  armed robbery involving $10?
  
  will he face the gallows?
  
  
• OasisBlue

  14 Aug 06, 18:12

  simple ownage!
• OasisBlue

  14 Aug 06, 18:12

  so he only "robbed" 10 bucks?
• digicharat

  14 Aug 06, 18:43

  he will be a laughing stock in prison.
• gd4u

  14 Aug 06, 20:09

  IS he jsut stupid or suay ??
• MrFugue

  14 Aug 06, 20:16

  not bad norhs $10 dollars go jail get free lodging and food
  
• photo_seeker

  14 Aug 06, 20:48

  I think he could be a drug addict or a heavy drinker who want money to satisfy his fits. But armed robbery for $10 and get caught almost the very next second is simply OWNED.
• redstone

  14 Aug 06, 21:14

  Rob a lady
  
  Use weapon
  
  Rob $10 only
  
  Rob beside police?
• Pitot

  14 Aug 06, 21:19

  Kum Gong
• MrDeeJay

  14 Aug 06, 21:32

  how would a robber know how much the victim has?
• manyu882

  14 Aug 06, 22:51

  ask the victim lo
• rathcycle

  14 Aug 06, 22:54

  Originally posted by FireIce:

  next he can try robbing a police

  sekali he rob the police of his gun and the police dunno wad to do ...
• martin_lim85

  14 Aug 06, 22:58

  pawned
• NT2

  14 Aug 06, 23:01

  he can try robbing the CISCO van.
• fudgester

  14 Aug 06, 23:06

  You mean the police actually did something? Wow.
• tim482

  14 Aug 06, 23:08

  ROFL
  
  
• monoslayer

  14 Aug 06, 23:10

  Originally posted by NT2:

  he can try robbing the CISCO van.

  wif a pen knife??
• Ponders

  14 Aug 06, 23:17

  Don't be surprised.
  
  His defence in court is that he was arrested illegally as Armed Robbery is a Civil case and the police got no legal powers to interfere.
  
  Thus the woman gotta go Magistrate Court to bring up the case to see if the police should investigate.
• fudgester

  14 Aug 06, 23:27

  Originally posted by Ponders:

  Don't be surprised.
  
  His defence in court is that he was arrested illegally as Armed Robbery is a Civil case and the police got no legal powers to interfere.
  
  Thus the woman gotta go Magistrate Court to bring up the case to see if the police should investigate.

  I know.
  
  Considering that the police didn't want to interfere in an assault case, I'm surprised that they would want to interfere in an armed robbery case.
• sgquitter

  14 Aug 06, 23:49

  Originally posted by Ponders:

  Don't be surprised.
  
  His defence in court is that he was arrested illegally as Armed Robbery is a Civil case and the police got no legal powers to interfere.
  
  Thus the woman gotta go Magistrate Court to bring up the case to see if the police should investigate.

  how come the police skip the regular procedures this time?
  
  can sue the police for that? it is illegal to arrest the man since its oni a civil case!!
  
  
• redstone

  15 Aug 06, 00:21

  Originally posted by fudgester:

  I know.
  
  Considering that the police didn't want to interfere in an assault case, I'm surprised that they would want to interfere in an armed robbery case.

  And suprisingly placing cardboard cutouts are investigated immediately
• coolgeek84

  15 Aug 06, 01:32

  Wahaha! f*cking retarded man.. Rob also rob $10 Can't even buy a proper Chicken Rice in some restaurants..
• anfuni

  15 Aug 06, 02:10

  Originally posted by Ponders:

  Don't be surprised.
  
  His defence in court is that he was arrested illegally as Armed Robbery is a Civil case and the police got no legal powers to interfere.
  
  Thus the woman gotta go Magistrate Court to bring up the case to see if the police should investigate.

  armed or without armed.... robbery is criminal case wor...
  
  lol.... can see u hate police to the core....
• stellazio

  15 Aug 06, 02:27

  he never see the police behind ar?