Bcos nowsaday students extremely naughty and bad, parents also cannont control, spoilt their child..that's why teacher no choice got to punish them. If not bcos of pay, no one wants to become teachers. Am i right, teachers. Keep complaining teachers, teachers dont work lor..let sg filled with the Lians and the Bengs fight and &*!$ till no tomorrowsso r u saying tat juz cos students r extremely naughty n bad, hence teachers shld be as sadistic n harsh as tis? if teachers portray an inhumane image, wad kind of value r they teaching the students?
students are sadistic not the teacher. This is just a mirror reflection. Too much pride is a fall for both parties.Originally posted by despondent:so r u saying tat juz cos students r extremely naughty n bad, hence teachers shld be as sadistic n harsh as tis? if teachers portray an inhumane image, wad kind of value r they teaching the students?
students are sadistic not the teacher. This is just a mirror reflection. Too much pride is a fall for both parties.can u explain wad u mean by students being the ones who r sadistic? n so r u saying the teacher in tis case is nt sadistic? tat her punishments r reasonable?
So, u r living in 25-30 yrs ago when u were anyhow cane by the teacher??? Then students must be fined too if they misbehave. Wouldnt that solve all problems of discipline?? Dont always victimised urself and a whining child.Originally posted by kheop:imo some teachers enjoy caning students for nothing , those teachers
must be fined if they cane students for Ridiculous Reasons.
But in any case nowadays is different than 25-30 years ago.
Well.. I just dislike the whining kids nowsaday thinking highly of themselves.well, i agree wif tis statement...but my pt is do u tink the teacher was way off wif her punishments? as in will tis kind of punishments realli solve anything? we r nt toking abt serious offences like scolding vulgarities, playing truant etc...we r toking abt common offences like toking in class, nt bringing bks/handing in work...
I beg to differ. I feel that your point being made here is totally illogical and idiotic. I don't get the idiocy of it at all. I do not see any sincerity from her actions at all, and if you think that that is a sense of humanity she is portraying, it is not what you think it is. False and illusioned.Originally posted by despondent:but i must say tat at least tis teacher has some humanity in her. she is slightly gentler to the females. from wad i noe, female students hardly ever had to kneel on marbles...onli unrepentant n hardened female students were made to do tat n there were hardly any. they were onli made to either kneel on floor or bottle caps(which is less painful).
when it comes to the hands, females were onli made to pull ears, raise both hands straight in front of them wif a bk on top or slapping of cheeks. bags were considered heavy n so they were spared from tat. for slapping, the teacher would place a time limit. she would make them slap themselves hard for abt 5 min then allow them to stop n switch to ear-pulling.
so we can see tat the teacher regulated punishments according to the tolerance level of both sexes. females were seen to have lower tolerance n hence were given lighter punishments.
I don't think this type of punishment is allowed in S'pore school,the 'only' punishment allow is caning on the buttocks,max 6 strokes with a 'light' cane...Originally posted by despondent:but i must say tat at least tis teacher has some humanity in her. she is slightly gentler to the females. from wad i noe, female students hardly ever had to kneel on marbles...onli unrepentant n hardened female students were made to do tat n there were hardly any. they were onli made to either kneel on floor or bottle caps(which is less painful).
when it comes to the hands, females were onli made to pull ears, raise both hands straight in front of them wif a bk on top or slapping of cheeks. bags were considered heavy n so they were spared from tat. for slapping, the teacher would place a time limit. she would make them slap themselves hard for abt 5 min then allow them to stop n switch to ear-pulling.
so we can see tat the teacher regulated punishments according to the tolerance level of both sexes. females were seen to have lower tolerance n hence were given lighter punishments.
I beg to differ. I feel that your point being made here is totally illogical and idiotic. I don't get the idiocy of it at all. I do not see any sincerity from her actions at all, and if you think that that is a sense of humanity she is portraying, it is not what you think it is. False and illusioned.so r u suggesting tat equal punishments shld be meted out to the females? if tats the case, then caning shld be enforced for females who break the law too...[/code]
I can describe what you are saying with just one sentence: The teacher is practising favouritism and is characteristically biased towards female students.
I strongly condemn any punishment which is beyond humanity. My point here is that punishments, reasonable punishments, should be meted out equally in an unbiased manner, without fear or favour towards anyone or anything.Originally posted by despondent:so r u suggesting tat equal punishments shld be meted out to the females? if tats the case, then caning shld be enforced for females who break the law too...[/code]
Agreed,i also 'prefer' to get the cane instead of boring detention or suspension.!!Originally posted by despondent:so r u suggesting tat equal punishments shld be meted out to the females? if tats the case, then caning shld be enforced for females who break the law too...[/code]
Agreed,i also 'prefer' to get the cane instead of boring detention or suspension.!!So u mean u prefer caning than being punished like those students i mentioned? maybe nt the inhumane case, wad abt those type of punishments in earlier posts?
kawasaki2
I strongly condemn any punishment which is beyond humanity. My point here is that punishments, reasonable punishments, should be meted out equally in an unbiased manner, without fear or favour towards anyone or anything.
Why was the teacher meting out such punishments based purely on sexual discrimination? I don't think that is humane, acceptable or reasonable in any way at all.
Teachers can punish, but not to the extent where they do it like as if they are the pupil's parents. Parents have the right and authority and the responsibility to ensure and protect their children's health, life and safety regardless of the circumstances or consequences.
The most basic and simple reason I can find here in this situation is that ever-ybody is equal based on the simple fact that we are all human beings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Teachers are expected to treat everyone with equally?? human rights and all.. but its all goona be One sided..
teachers are sometimes treated like slaves.. what can help ?? reason with them??
students scold , curse teachers on blogs. YET nOTHING CAN BE done.. then pple will refute as FREedom of SPeech..
wadever..
Teachers are always wrong..
Yes.!But i am a girl....no caning is given to a girl in school..Originally posted by despondent:So u mean u prefer caning than being punished like those students i mentioned? maybe nt the inhumane case, wad abt those type of punishments in earlier posts?