Ok, you must be some imbecile who probably lives in your own world where logic and common sense is non existent.Originally posted by de_middle:so? u intending to carry out such acts izzit![]()
Wait wait. Just last week, a woman wrote to the Today newspaper and pointed out that under the Penal code, a man who forces his wife to have sexual intercourse with him is not considered rape.Originally posted by wisefool83:Yes, it is considered to be rape, known as wife-rape. It is a criminal offence but often difficult to prove because burden of proof rests on the victim, so the wife must prove that she did not give consent or explicitly disagree to have sex. Problem of course, it is most likely to be her words against her husband's. Victims of wife rape can seek help and advice from AWARE or UNIFEM.
its a rape. definitely. refer to the penal code i posted in the previous page.Originally posted by shade343:Wait wait. Just last week, a woman wrote to the Today newspaper and pointed out that under the Penal code, a man who forces his wife to have sexual intercourse with him is not considered rape.
15 considered statutory rapeOriginally posted by browniebaobao:14 yrs old?
above that not considered rape la?
period, no mood, tired, stressOriginally posted by NT2:hmmmm but then y the wife refuses to? tt is something u need to ask urself![]()
![]()
Originally posted by monoslayer:what if the man forces her against her will, but she accepts later and then cry rape when its over?
[b]Rape.
375. A man is said to commit “rape” who, except in the case hereinafter excepted, has sexual intercourse with a woman under circumstances falling under any of the 5 following descriptions:
(a) against her will;
(b) without her consent;
(c) with her consent, when her consent has been obtained by putting her in fear of death or hurt;
(d) with her consent, when the man knows that he is not her husband, and her consent is given because she believes that he is another man to whom she is or believes herself to be lawfully married or to whom she would consent;
(e) with or without her consent, when she is under 14 years of age.[/b]
cos the hubby cums b4 she did?Originally posted by newcomer:even if husband forces himself on wife, why would the wife wanna sue the husband? makes no sense...
Relationship going downhill so take the chance to sabo hubby. Make him a laughing stock undergoing investigation and probably lose his job.Originally posted by newcomer:even if husband forces himself on wife, why would the wife wanna sue the husband? makes no sense...
Hmm, thanks. Is that all to it? I wonder why the a woman writer would write to the Today newspaper claiming that the Penal code says that its legal for the a married man to force his wife to have sexual intercourse with him...The issue was about the women's charter with regards to equality for both sexes.Originally posted by monoslayer:its a rape. definitely. refer to the penal code i posted in the previous page.
Originally posted by monoslayer:can any1 explain what (d) is saying ?
[b]Rape.
375. A man is said to commit “rape” who, except in the case hereinafter excepted, has sexual intercourse with a woman under circumstances falling under any of the 5 following descriptions:
(a) against her will;
(b) without her consent;
(c) with her consent, when her consent has been obtained by putting her in fear of death or hurt;
(d) with her consent, when the man knows that he is not her husband, and her consent is given because she believes that he is another man to whom she is or believes herself to be lawfully married or to whom she would consent;
(e) with or without her consent, when she is under 14 years of age.[/b]
it means tat u have consensual sex wif her when u r aware tat u r not her husband n she only consent to have sex wif u becos she tot u r her husband or someone she wanna have sex wif.Originally posted by starExcaliblur:can any1 explain what (d) is saying ?
if both r willing parties.Originally posted by margarita:marriage is not license for sex?
I have not read the article and could therefore not comment accurately on it. But my guess is that she is trying to make the point that it is not explicitly written in the law that it is illegal to rape your own wife even though the penal code should be interpretated so So maybe she wants an additional section that specifically says that it is considered a rape even if it is done on your own wife.Originally posted by shade343:Hmm, thanks. Is that all to it? I wonder why the a woman writer would write to the Today newspaper claiming that the Penal code says that its legal for the a married man to force his wife to have sexual intercourse with him...The issue was about the women's charter with regards to equality for both sexes.
No! Marriage is definitely not license for sex. The license for sex is mutual consent, with or without marriage. The license is a one off thingy and therefore consent(either explicit or subtle) must be sorted every time b4 sex.Originally posted by margarita:marriage is not license for sex?