Nov 11, 2006
Help the needy? Yes, but PAP and opposition MPs differ on how to do so
DIFFERENT STROKES: Mr Low clashed with Dr Balakrish- nan over whether the Government's social safety net should be a permanent and unconditional one.
WP's Low urges Govt not to be fearful of helping poor
COMMUNITY Development Minister Vivian Balakrishnan and opposition MP Low Thia Khiang ended on the same side yesterday - on the stand that no needy citizen should be left without government aid.
But that was all the two could see eye-to-eye about.
In a civil but volley-for-volley exchange, the pair disputed whether the Government's social safety net should be a 'permanent, unconditional' one.
The minister sparked the match when he highlighted Mr Low's Workers' Party manifesto on its website which states that assistance to citizens should be given on an 'unconditional, permanent needs-based' basis.
Dr Balakrishnan, who oversees youth and sports policies, criticised the model.
'Firstly, it's unsustainable: You will run bankrupt sooner or later. Secondly, you are not doing the people you are trying to help any favours. And third, you erode the work ethic that is at the heart of the success and identity of Singapore,' he said.
'That's the big difference between WP and us,' summed up the PAP minister.
Dr Balakrishnan then noted that Mr Low and his party colleague Non- Constituency MP Sylvia Lim had not spoken about a 'permanent' and 'unconditional' safety net, and wondered aloud if the opposition members had had a 'change of position'.
'If you have, we welcome you to the club and we will definitely work with you to improve our social safety net,' he said.
That drew a swift rebuttal from Mr Low, who rose to declare that the WP had not changed its mind.
He said: 'We believe people need some certainty. You've got to give people that certainty, especially under the condition of structural unemployment and... because a lot of jobs are on contract.
'We should provide people with the confidence that the Government will help them if they are in trouble.'
Dr Balakrishnan replied that indeed, Singaporeans should have every confidence that if they try their best to be self-reliant, they will get help to become so.
As for Mr Low's question on whether help schemes are effective, Dr Balakrishnan said performance indicators are in place to track the outcomes.
He also took pains to stress that 'this Government will not ignore people who need help simply because of a fear of abuse.'
The MP for Holland-Bukit Timah GRC disclosed that 'in my own constituency, my instructions for anyone who needs help urgently, is that we'll give help first, we'll ask questions later'.
If any constituent tries to abuse the system, 'he can only cheat me once', he noted.
How can Mr Low gave such an idea. It's suicidal when Global Crossing, which counts Singapore's Temasek Holdings as its biggest shareholder, lost US$50 million, or US$1.40 a share, down from US$94 million, or US$4.56 a share, a year ago. Couple with the uncertainty to the shin corps deal now.
Although we had billions of dollars in our national reserves and some profits from HDB flats and yearly increase in public transportation fares, we must know it is for investment purposes due to our lack of natural resources. We also need to pay our civil servants, police and our elite part-time minister $13k per month. If the social safety net is implemented, our country will definately bankrupt.
Just take a lot at US and Canada. They both has unconditional welfare but their economy is stagnant. In the event we get retrenchment or incapablities compared with foreign talents due to their competitive salary scale, we can still enjoy beautiful cover-walkways and mini gardens in our HDB neighbourhood for leisure. We shouldn't harbour such unreasonable demand and stress our minster further as they need the energy to source for more foreign talents and give them scholarship so that they can lead us.
Instead, we should rack our brains and try to keep the foreign talents here, else they choose to retire like a king back home. Singaporeans must know what is the piority and if in doubt, look to our minster as they will never be wrong.