IQ impt or EQ?
-
Would you rather have high IQ but low EQ or low IQ but high EQ?
Say! -
50/50
-
a smart but socially inept.. vs a dumb but socially able...
hmm..
i would think maybe the honesty would play a part...
frankly, i don't know.. coz i'm dumb and socially inept
-
70% eq n 30% iq
cause iq important to get a job n eq can let u get promoted -
if mus choose only 1 I rather take eq.....it allows you to live better
-
I want to be a retard so then I don't have to worry about either
-
HQ is equally important as well!
-
EQ would be the choice.
-
both, but if both, i will choose EQ. it will bring you to greater heights.
-
seeing that even people who dont make sense in their posts are so welcomed by you all, I choose EQ.
-
I'll go with IQ
-
in exams MCQ is the most important la
-
I always think EQ is more important than IQ (but of course, IQ cannot be as low as retarded lah).
High IQ, low EQ person tend to be overly ambitious and impulsive. They tend to make grave mistakes because they never think twice before they act. They don't think twice because firstly, they are clouded by their own emotion. Secondly, they think they are smart (overconfident).
Whilst Low IQ, High EQ person may not be smart or bright in their studies. But they have the ability to calm down their mind and think clearly before they move. -
moderation is the key.
-
both are impt, but to me EQ is more impt..
for me i'd rather 60% EQ 40% IQ than 90% IQ 10% EQ nia
-
High IQ.
Because EQ can be trained.
IQ harder to train.
Meat Pao. -
both are important.
-
iq lah.
its a gift. -
If I rich I will take eq If I am poor I nid both.......
-
Depends on which one makes me rich and depends on which one paves the way for my career.
frankly , I think both are just a load of BS. -
IQ better