Who is the murderer?
-
oi say leh...Originally posted by banzie:One day hor you suddenly walked into a room... and saw this man lying on the floor dead with blood and cuts gashing out of his forehead, abit on the floor and on the chair he was sitting on.... And in the room there is nothing else.. but 3 other man... each saying the other is the murderer..... the three people are
A) A small petite man with a fruit knife.
B) A Big sized man with two handkechief.
C) A Big sized man with a baton on hands...
None of them have any blood stain on any part of them so its impossible to tell who is the murderer by traces of blood.
So who is the smart alex can tell me who murder the man? A,B or C?
-
Think the guy with 2 handkerchief. No blood coz he wipe away mah. TS mentioned no blood on them, but not no blood on the handkerchief. So the guy with 2 handkerchief can say he help stop the bleeding, but is actually him.
-
The 3 men accused each other which means that all 3 were beating up the dead man but 1 had caused the death. In a state of panic the 3 men did not exactly know who among them actually dealt the killer blow. This is probably the reason why they accused each other.Originally posted by banzie:One day hor you suddenly walked into a room... and saw this man lying on the floor dead with blood and cuts gashing out of his forehead, abit on the floor and on the chair he was sitting on.... And in the room there is nothing else.. but 3 other man... each saying the other is the murderer..... the three people are
A) A small petite man with a fruit knife.
B) A Big sized man with two handkechief.
C) A Big sized man with a baton on hands...
None of them have any blood stain on any part of them so its impossible to tell who is the murderer by traces of blood.
So who is the smart alex can tell me who murder the man? A,B or C?
A is least likely to cause the death since he is small even though he has a fruit knife. He can only probably cause the cuts which may not lead to the death of the man.
C is a big sized man with a baton. He could probably knock out the guy with just a swing which may not leave any time for A to cause any cuts.
Probably B is the murderer as he can use the hankerchiefs to strangle the guy to death.
LMAO I don't know.. just bullsh!tting.. Need more details lah.. -
A. cauz all 2 other mens are big sized
-
Lol.. Elaborate on your rationale leh.. Big sized cannot be murderer meh?Originally posted by jay_rocks:A. cauz all 2 other mens are big sized -
orhhh!!!!
i noe who liao!!!
dun tel you all!!! -
who?Originally posted by popikachu:orhhh!!!!
i noe who liao!!!
dun tel you all!!! -
none of the above.
He fell onto the floor, than kena cut, so blood gush out. Than he went to sit on the chair to rest and stop the bleeding. However, the bleeding got more serious and the blood drip onto the chair, than he died from loss of blood. This explains the blood found on the floor and chair and the cuts on him too.
BUT BUT BUT...the three unlucky man came in after he died. And they found those knife hankerchief blah blah in their possesion, thats why now they are being accused of murder.
Issit????
oya, the one with baton is the mata, so tt leaves two suspects behind. -
aiya, so easy, the person who came in last! he wanna tui xian zhe ren!
-
Wah kaoz you all huh.... hmmm this one very difficult meh? all my quiz in the past hor always solved by you people now this one.... sigh... Some choose the correct answer... but the explanation is wrong already.... Only ONE of them is the murderer.... and one of them is indeed the murderer... Think outside the box... I'll review the answer tonite...
-
Y da guy has TWO handkerchiefs har...? Banquet dancer?
-
No.Originally posted by Bontakun:Y da guy has TWO handkerchiefs har...? Banquet dancer?
A fairy.
Not the type who grants wishes though. -
C!!! becauseOriginally posted by banzie:One day hor you suddenly walked into a room... and saw this man lying on the floor dead with blood and cuts gashing out of his forehead, abit on the floor and on the chair he was sitting on.... And in the room there is nothing else.. but 3 other man... each saying the other is the murderer..... the three people are
A) A small petite man with a fruit knife.
B) A Big sized man with two handkechief.
C) A Big sized man with a baton on hands...
None of them have any blood stain on any part of them so its impossible to tell who is the murderer by traces of blood.
So who is the smart alex can tell me who murder the man? A,B or C?
'C) A Big sized man with a baton on hands...'
got three full stop!!! so mus be him!!! -
b!!! mus be him!!!
all other taking weapon except him!!!
hmmm... mus be lah!!! -
A mus be him!!!
police suspect big big ppl nia mah
so he thought police only catch the big guys!!!
he taking a weapon fake fake thought police will think no one will take weapon when police come in...
mus be him!!! -
Ru Hua!?Originally posted by charlize:No.
A fairy.
Not the type who grants wishes though.
-
*random*
-
B la...cut on forehead cant kill...hanky can strangle/suffocate ma..
-
No one got it 100% right...
Firstly Knife is unlikely to kill a person by stabbing the forehead... furthermore the skull is very thick almost impossible to kill him that way... that some of you got it right. Its also not logical ... anyway so you know the answer already? Think it thru before scrolling down further.....
Ok Now left with 2 suspect... It must be hit by impact.... and definitely a tool... there is no traces of blood on any of them... no traces of blood on C.... so his clean... if he use his baton definitely there is blood... so he is out... know you know how B does it? Think before you scroll!!!
Ok.. Finally its only B.... and he definitely needs a weapon... the weapon is in the room... and the only other weapon is the chair with the traces of blood... No one else can hold the chair... and if the person has the intention to kill a man he will leave no prints... therefore the handkechief is used to hold the chair to hit the victim... that's how B kill him...
Do you like my quiz? Please let me know leh.. -
this is sooooo irritating.
Another one!!
-
Irritating? You cannot solve then say irritating kaoz...Originally posted by TYING:this is sooooo irritating.
Another one!! -
Originally posted by banzie:Irritating? You cannot solve then say irritating kaoz...
another one another one. sure can!
-
reasoning for person A is alright..Originally posted by banzie:No one got it 100% right...
Firstly Knife is unlikely to kill a person by stabbing the forehead... furthermore the skull is very thick almost impossible to kill him that way... that some of you got it right. Its also not logical ... anyway so you know the answer already? Think it thru before scrolling down further.....
Ok Now left with 2 suspect... It must be hit by impact.... and definitely a tool... there is no traces of blood on any of them... no traces of blood on C.... so his clean... if he use his baton definitely there is blood... so he is out... know you know how B does it? Think before you scroll!!!
Ok.. Finally its only B.... and he definitely needs a weapon... the weapon is in the room... and the only other weapon is the chair with the traces of blood... No one else can hold the chair... and if the person has the intention to kill a man he will leave no prints... therefore the handkechief is used to hold the chair to hit the victim... that's how B kill him...
Do you like my quiz? Please let me know leh..
but well, why must the deceased be 'hit by impact'? why cannot the 2 hankerchiefs tie together to strangle the person?
and no, there might not necessarily be blood even if the baton is used..i think -
waste webspace leh
-
use baton will have owe chaire(blue black)Originally posted by mystiv:reasoning for person A is alright..
but well, why must the deceased be 'hit by impact'? why cannot the 2 hankerchiefs tie together to strangle the person?
and no, there might not necessarily be blood even if the baton is used..i think