Egg first? Or chicken first?
-
If you believe in God...then of cos chicken 1st....God wont go around create an egg right??
If you believe in science....nature wont go and evolve an egg also
So therefore its chicken 1st..definitely -
fuck darwinism.Originally posted by ShutterBug:This Chicken or Egg thing...
Ok, if anyone really bothers about the answer, I can bet you its origin goes back several or even hudnreds of millions of years ago.
Yes, I believe the chicken were once Dinosaurs, who were once just a micro-organism which in turn came from the ocean.
In essence, it was the first living cells that produced the first dinosaur, which evolved and in turn became the current Chicken.
-
Originally posted by siaokau:
Why?
fu[b]ck darwinism. [/b]
The ancestor of modern birds were most likely dinosaurs.
This is supported by data.
You just entered my department, dear. -
goose come first..... then where did the goose come from? and then......
and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then..........and then......and then......and then......and then......and then...........and then......and then......and then......and then.........and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then..........and then......and then......and then......and then.........and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then.............and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then.............and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then.............and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then......and then...................... -
good one...Originally posted by Mid9Sun:If you believe in God...then of cos chicken 1st....God wont go around create an egg right??
If you believe in science....nature wont go and evolve an egg also
So therefore its chicken 1st..definitely
i didnt think of that...
anyone got more idea which one come first?
egg or chiken?!?!?!? -
its chicken la
ji dan
see ji is at the front -
no lor den if the egg not fertilse den how to born chicken
-
Egg came first.
Universe was created by big bang theory.
God is nth but beliefs ppl came up with. -
peace to everyone who is angry about reading this...Originally posted by Xephone_xenon:Egg came first.
Universe was created by big bang theory.
God is nth but beliefs ppl came up with.
Xephone_xenon next time put it in better word...
everyone has their own right of thought...
all religion teaches about peace and not hatred over each other...
anewae dont turn this tread into religous argueing...
make peace and everyone will love each other...
hmmm does this world have a sciencetist who belive in religious stuff?
like a scientist trying to reserch on religious thing and science...
combining both thing together...
like in the bible... moses cross the water... science explain that that is due to something call gravity changes... chirst believe that god made it...
so why not lets say that god chose that day that the gravity will change for moses to cross the water? and god made that day come?
btw i support both science and and chirst... -
chicken came first la...why? cheeken ish evolved from other animals...juz like us...we evolved from monkeys...so the cheeken evolve *100 until one day...the first ceekens lay eggs and the chain cycle continues..ps the egg u see now is not the egg they first laid...i suppose the egg they first laid is suppose to be soft and without a shell one de no protection ...then time pass..slowly turn hard due to nature nid to protect itself ..till until now lor..buai buai..i very sleepy i go sleep..i also dun know wad i saying.s
-
bye bye sleep tight... to get the correct answer inside dream**Originally posted by Classyfied:chicken came first la...why? cheeken ish evolved from other animals...juz like us...we evolved from monkeys...so the cheeken evolve *100 until one day...the first ceekens lay eggs and the chain cycle continues..ps the egg u see now is not the egg they first laid...i suppose the egg they first laid is suppose to be soft and without a shell one de no protection ...then time pass..slowly turn hard due to nature nid to protect itself ..till until now lor..buai buai..i very sleepy i go sleep..i also dun know wad i saying.s 
-
What matters is not whether the egg or chicken came first.The thing that really matters is when will the last chicken or egg be killed off by avian flu.
-
oh goodness lets avoid making another religion thread... lets keep it humourous.. i think both comes first ah..
-
In the past, only dinosaur roam the earth.
After that leh, dinosaur go thru shrinking process. After that they underwent plastic surgery. Den POOP! Chicken come out.
Therefore, I conclude that the chicken come first. -
-
Water first, then got life.
-
Evolution is not a proven science.Originally posted by Where Is God:Wow, you sure is outdated.
The official consensus in the scientific community is the egg come first.
Why?
Because animals don't evolve over their life time.
you can't have a dog which turns into the first chicken overnight. No, the dog has to lay an egg which contains the genetics of a chicken for the first chicken to be born.
[/thead]
Let us imagine a special typewriter that can type randomly by itself. It has with 50 keys, comprised of 26 capital letters, 10 numbers, one space bar, and 13 symbols for punctuation, etc.How long do you think would it would take to correctly type the sentence “THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION IS BELIEVABLE?”.
To obtain the answer, let us first consider the first word of the sentence, which reads: “THE”.
According to the Multiplication Rule of Probability, the chance of correctly typing the three designated letters “THE” from possibilities is 1 in 50 x 50 x 50, which equals 125,000. At a rate of one strike per second, the average time taken to make 125,000 strikes is 34.72 hours.The chance of randomly typing the ten keys (nine letters and one space) in the right sequence for the two words “THE THEORY” is 1 in 50 x 50 … ten times (50 to the power of 10). This is 1 chance in 9.76563E+16 or more than 9 quadrillion or 9 followed by 16 zeros! There are 31,536,000 seconds in a year, so the average time taken in years to make 9.76563E+16 strikes at the rate of one strike per second would be 3,096,659,373 or 3 trillion years!
The time taken on the average to correctly type the whole of sentence, which contains 40 letters, punctuation, and spaces, would be 50 to the power of 38 divided by 31,536,000 (seconds in a year), which is 1.1536E+57 or more than 1 trillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion years!
By comparison, the evolutionistsÂ’ age of the Earth is only 4.6 billion years, and the evolutionistsÂ’ age of the universe is only almost 15 billion years.
Can you still believe in the theory of evolution? I can't!
BTW, dog doesn't lay egg
-
Evolution is science. Supported by evidence from various fields such as palaeontology, anatomy, zoology, embryology, developmental biology and more recently molecular genetics (which is my department).Originally posted by Arbitrageur:Evolution is not a proven science.
Let us imagine a special typewriter that can type randomly by itself. It has with 50 keys, comprised of 26 capital letters, 10 numbers, one space bar, and 13 symbols for punctuation, etc.How long do you think would it would take to correctly type the sentence “THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION IS BELIEVABLE?”.
To obtain the answer, let us first consider the first word of the sentence, which reads: “THE”.
According to the Multiplication Rule of Probability, the chance of correctly typing the three designated letters “THE” from possibilities is 1 in 50 x 50 x 50, which equals 125,000. At a rate of one strike per second, the average time taken to make 125,000 strikes is 34.72 hours.The chance of randomly typing the ten keys (nine letters and one space) in the right sequence for the two words “THE THEORY” is 1 in 50 x 50 … ten times (50 to the power of 10). This is 1 chance in 9.76563E+16 or more than 9 quadrillion or 9 followed by 16 zeros! There are 31,536,000 seconds in a year, so the average time taken in years to make 9.76563E+16 strikes at the rate of one strike per second would be 3,096,659,373 or 3 trillion years!
The time taken on the average to correctly type the whole of sentence, which contains 40 letters, punctuation, and spaces, would be 50 to the power of 38 divided by 31,536,000 (seconds in a year), which is 1.1536E+57 or more than 1 trillion quadrillion quadrillion quadrillion years!
By comparison, the evolutionistsÂ’ age of the Earth is only 4.6 billion years, and the evolutionistsÂ’ age of the universe is only almost 15 billion years.
Can you still believe in the theory of evolution? I can't!
BTW, dog doesn't lay egg
Your analogy misrepresents evolutionary theory in three ways.
1. Discussing random sequence variation without mentioning natural selection.
2. DNA sequence is 4-base, not 50-base.
3. You assume teleology, which means the final sentence must read “THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION IS BELIEVABLE?” exactly, character for character. It will take much less time to spell "EVOLUTION - TRUE?" which preserves the meaning of the phrase with less letters. In real living systems, novel genes can have different roles from ancestral functions. Longer, shorter, different... if it works, the living systems aren't picky.
This is called attacking a "straw man" because you are claiming something scientist don't claim, which you then make it sound ridiculous, because it is ridiculous.
Also, evolutionary biologists did not compute the age of the Universe - cosmologists, who are physicists (using other techniques and models) did. -
Those evidences are not conclusive and never will be.Originally posted by Cystaire:Evolution is science. Supported by evidence from various fields such as palaeontology, anatomy, zoology, embryology, developmental biology and more recently molecular genetics (which is my department).
...
When we ponder where a watch comes from, we think of the watch maker and do not doubt that it is a creation.
If the watch cannot be a product of evolution, what makes you think that a monomer had evolved to apes and then to the human kind?
Why is it so difficult for evolutionist to believe in a creator God?
“For I do not seek to understand so that I may believe; but I believe so that I may understand. For I believe this also, that unless I believe, I shall not understand.” -
Ok.Originally posted by Arbitrageur:Those evidences are not conclusive and never will be.
When we ponder where a watch comes from, we think of the watch maker and do not doubt that it is a creation.
If the watch cannot be a product of evolution, what makes you think that a monomer had evolved to apes and then to the human kind?
Why is it so difficult for evolutionist to believe in a creator God?
“For I do not seek to understand so that I may believe; but I believe so that I may understand. For I believe this also, that unless I believe, I shall not understand.”
Since you believe you win, you win.
Yay! -
when religion comes in, discussion comes in.
when long discussions come in, hypocrites and anti-christians come in...
then comes arguments, and thread closed. -
Ok you win too!Originally posted by davidche:when religion comes in, discussion comes in.
when long discussions come in, hypocrites and anti-christians come in...
then comes arguments, and thread closed.
There are plenty of wins to pass around. -
Dude, pls think about your question before you ask it.Originally posted by CKeer:Where is God from den?
Cheers.
C.K
God cant be created if he is God right? if he is created then the person that created him must be the real God.
In christians' view, God is the first cause of all things.
In atheists' view, Nature is ever present, thus doesnt need a cause wich also means that it will never change. Indefinite.
But if we study secondlaw of thermodynamics(is this the right word?), and observe the earth, we find that resources are depleting, how then, will it be ever present? we ought to assue that nature will die out. -
No need to discuss any more. You win already. I gave you win.Originally posted by davidche:Dude, pls think about your question before you ask it.
God cant be created if he is God right? if he is created then the person that created him must be the real God.
In christians' view, God is the first cause of all things.
In atheists' view, Nature is ever present, thus doesnt need a cause wich also means that it will never change. Indefinite.
But if we study secondlaw of thermodynamics(is this the right word?), and observe the earth, we find that resources are depleting, how then, will it be ever present? we ought to assue that nature will die out. -
discussion no such thing as "win or lose" one...Originally posted by Cystaire:No need to discuss any more. You win already. I gave you win.
cus everyone win from the discussion...