Ithink it is unrealistic to expect the last sentence to materialise bcos.........this bloody world is unfair anyway.Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:NB. I was waiting a reply at the forum page
How can like that. If all those 5~6 pointer wanna go poly, then those avg(20~26) pointers got no place but to choose ITE/Pte dip/workforce leh.
I hope to see..
Increase the intake of popular course and some other good thing.
This gotta be a trend in a few years time leh..
I aagree to the person who wrote to the ST on dunno which date that Every student should be given a chance to study what they like.
Another fine example of High IQ but Low EQ, Anyone?Originally posted by SBS3625D:.......an article in ST with a concern parent talking about folks who can go top 5 JC should not go poly bcos it deprives not-so-good ones of poly places?
My take is...........I study hard so that I can choose. So if I wanna go poly but get 6 points, will of course still go poly. Message to parent, too bad.
I'm being bloody brutal.Originally posted by Agenda:Another fine example of High IQ but Low EQ, Anyone?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I gonna enroll to RP within this two week.Originally posted by snop_coolz:actually i prefer those jc - standard ppl to go poly...although many would view this as competition and derive ppl of higher pointers to less favorable course or even ITE..however in my point of view..this competition instead rises the standard of poly..giving it a impression of not just a place for JC -cmi-s..instead..this trend will also rise poly standard...a good example would b this year psychology course and optometry at SP and NP... these courses i believe are made for low pointers..and are signs that the standard of poly IS rising...
in fact i do not agree with the idea of jc-ppl goin poly would derive poly ppl of their places..this is becos..as a matter of fact...poly offer different courses.. these courses each has their own cop...like i mention above..so if student cannot meet the cop of these courses...they would only have themself to b blamed..
ok lets imagine this..poly courses cop became 18-28..would u still want to go poly?? so if the standard of poly do not rise with injections of low point scorer..it will dip..dip..and dip to the point that poly would become of little recognition..ermm..no offence..but imagine all poly to b like rp..yea..u get my point..
also..not forgetting that poly and jc had actually 2 different method of education..
Jc is the subject based learning where student studies various subject and different level of each subject..
poly on the other hand..give student hand on basis and equip them with skill essential for future career..
therefore..student should also have the choice to which ever type of education they wan...
humm..rp has its good and bad..just like everything else..its two sided..if theres a plus point..there has to b a negative point..its just how people view stuff...and often..ppl like to highlight the plus point and neglected the negative point..which in the case of rp..ppl highlighted the negative point..and neglected the plus point..Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:I gonna enroll to RP within this two week.
Someone in this forum said that RP is a dumping ground for those lousy students.. At first I strongly disagree.. But now, I have to agree to a little extend![]()
![]()
I don't use such a god-damn lame excuse if I can't make the mark for a course I want.Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:Got someone reply at the ST forum page that it could be due to baby boom on the year of Dragon or Snake 1898,1990.
I think it's ok. 2~3 paper per day is ok for me.Originally posted by SBS3625D:I don't use such a god-damn lame excuse if I can't make the mark for a course I want.
In around the same vein.........
Saw the ST forum section where this concern parent worries about the child's performance bcos the O's will be quite packed.
For me, I would say no. What about you guys?