Originally posted by rojak12:Apparently the formula in New Zealand is different from that in the UK. You will have to prove that preparations in Singapore do not conform to the product description.
+ 1 !!!
Seriously lawyers out there, can we start [b]a civil suit (or whatever suit) against GSK for misleading us for SO MANY years?
I made my children drink Ribena over other drinks thinking that it contains high level of Vitamin C and the "healthy" image it projected to us via advertisement.
Now we are shocked to further find out that:
"...Commerce Commission lawyer Nicholas Flanagan told the court the product was marketed as being healthy when in fact it contained more sugar than Coca-Cola."
NEARLY ZERO Vitamin C and high sugar content!!!!!
[/b]
ribena also widely use in church oneOriginally posted by shandower:Darn, I used to love drinking Ribena when I was younger.
Formula is different but the claim is the same.Originally posted by oxford mushroom:Apparently the formula in New Zealand is different from that in the UK. You will have to prove that preparations in Singapore do not conform to the product description.
Hahaha, they contradict themselves!Originally posted by banzie:
Originally posted by 0tah:18 % only nia.
nin nia ma... i still gt 2 packets in my fridge leh..heres the content
The packet ish 330ml
Per 100ml
Energy(kJ)-215
Energy(kcal)-51
Carbohydrate(g)-12.5
Total Sugar(g)-12.5
Protein(g)-0
Fat(g)-0
[b]Vitamin C(mg)-18.2 30%NRV![]()
![]()
[/b]
Commerce Commission lawyer Nicholas Flanagan told the court the product was marketed as being healthy when in fact it contained more sugar than Coca-Cola.so ironic then...s'pore school's canteen got sell ribena, but never sell coca-cola
Originally posted by sermodabian:Alamak!!! I am just drinking Ribena as I am reading this!!!