Virgin birth stuns scientists... at last, scientific proof..
-
-
Chey...I thought u referring to human...
-
Originally posted by Trump_Card:Chey...I thought u referring to human...
-
X2Originally posted by Trump_Card:Chey...I thought u referring to human... -
Shark Jesus is here to save all Sharks!
Shark Jesus will die for the sin of Sharks. -
You just don't grow up do you?Originally posted by the.owl:Shark Jesus is here to save all Sharks!
Shark Jesus will die for the sin of Sharks. -
I dont think a fool like you has the right to talk about growing up.Originally posted by banzie:You just don't grow up do you? -
Ha ha that is a nice one...no offense to christians but it is really funnyOriginally posted by the.owl:Shark Jesus is here to save all Sharks!
Shark Jesus will die for the sin of Sharks. -
good one~!
-
Nothing new. This kind of thing the just blow big nia.. I heard it 39908430 times liao.
-
Wasn't there a topic a while ago about this girl in Taiwan who got pregnant even though she was a virgin? She got the sperm from her boyfriend during pelting....
-
Hmm.... then list down the details of all you heard lor...Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:Nothing new. This kind of thing the just blow big nia.. I heard it 39908430 times liao.
-
Come to think of it... if it were a "virgin" birth w/o sperm instead of simply sperm penetration w/o penile penetration... the offspring should be a female like the mother since there is no DNA contribution by the male (through the sperm)... hmmmmmmmmmm....
-
WHO NEED MALES ?
Virgin birth
Wednesday, 23 May 2007 12:56
How a female shark managed to give birth to a pup without being in contact with a male for three years has been solved by scientists.
In December 2001 one of three captive female hammerhead sharks gave birth to a normally-developed, live female pup.
This birth puzzled scientists as the sharks had been in captivity for too long to be become pregnant by sperm storage.
US and British researchers therefore began to investigate the theory that the birth was the result of a-sexual reproduction, where one animal is able to reproduce without the need for the opposite sex.
They compared the DNA of the shark pup and its mother and found that the pup possessed no DNA from a male.
Writing in the Royal Society journal Biological Letters, the scientists argue that the pup was "unambiguously" from the mother alone.
They therefore claim that now a-sexual reproduction has been confirmed in a shark, the process has now been demonstrated "in all major jawed vertebrate lineages except mammals".
"Our results suggest that accumulating cases of female sharks producing healthy offspring in the absence of males warrant genetic evaluation to determine how common asexual reproductionÂ… is among these ancient fishes," they conclude.
-
Technically you are wrong.... Just that your Chromosome had some missing parts... It means you are either more than human or not human biological speaking. But why not possible... isn't evolutionist say its possible?Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:Come to think of it... if it were a "virgin" birth w/o sperm instead of simply sperm penetration w/o penile penetration... the offspring should be a female like the mother since there is no DNA contribution by the male (through the sperm)... hmmmmmmmmmm....
Usually animals unlike human who can produce without sex are creatures that can be male and female like someone suggested. Most animals don't enjoy sex...
perhaps only for a few like dophin and humans.... Your ape brother don't too... maybe you are evolved from dolphines.
Just Kidding... enough of the evolution thing. -
Anyway in the animal kingdom, this type of reproduction is very very common. But it is not very good for the species... even lizard can do that without male. Male interaction has some purpose in mixing the good genres another one another. I won't go into details but it could be likely that SPG and Ang mo produces better babies.
-
K!......
-
maybe some guys did their "business" in the sea