Originally posted by Trump_Card:Chey...I thought u referring to human...![]()
X2Originally posted by Trump_Card:Chey...I thought u referring to human...![]()
You just don't grow up do you?Originally posted by the.owl:Shark Jesus is here to save all Sharks!
Shark Jesus will die for the sin of Sharks.
I dont think a fool like you has the right to talk about growing up.Originally posted by banzie:You just don't grow up do you?
Ha ha that is a nice one...no offense to christians but it is really funnyOriginally posted by the.owl:Shark Jesus is here to save all Sharks!
Shark Jesus will die for the sin of Sharks.
Hmm.... then list down the details of all you heard lor...Originally posted by Darkness_hacker99:Nothing new. This kind of thing the just blow big nia.. I heard it 39908430 times liao.
WHO NEED MALES ?
Virgin birth
Wednesday, 23 May 2007 12:56
How a female shark managed to give birth to a pup without being in contact with a male for three years has been solved by scientists.
In December 2001 one of three captive female hammerhead sharks gave birth to a normally-developed, live female pup.
This birth puzzled scientists as the sharks had been in captivity for too long to be become pregnant by sperm storage.
US and British researchers therefore began to investigate the theory that the birth was the result of a-sexual reproduction, where one animal is able to reproduce without the need for the opposite sex.
They compared the DNA of the shark pup and its mother and found that the pup possessed no DNA from a male.
Writing in the Royal Society journal Biological Letters, the scientists argue that the pup was "unambiguously" from the mother alone.
They therefore claim that now a-sexual reproduction has been confirmed in a shark, the process has now been demonstrated "in all major jawed vertebrate lineages except mammals".
"Our results suggest that accumulating cases of female sharks producing healthy offspring in the absence of males warrant genetic evaluation to determine how common asexual reproductionÂ… is among these ancient fishes," they conclude.
Technically you are wrong.... Just that your Chromosome had some missing parts... It means you are either more than human or not human biological speaking. But why not possible... isn't evolutionist say its possible?Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:Come to think of it... if it were a "virgin" birth w/o sperm instead of simply sperm penetration w/o penile penetration... the offspring should be a female like the mother since there is no DNA contribution by the male (through the sperm)... hmmmmmmmmmm....![]()