Buddy boy, I'm the one who gets paid to conduct such tests, and a lousy sixty bucks puts you in the bargain-basement range - for that amount I might glance in your direction. Using collapsed age measurements smacks of mickey-mouse standards, but then again, psychological registration in Singapore (if whoever assessed you was ever registered in the first place) is a joke, so that's not surprising.Originally posted by spadeTwo:please go and take PAID iq test ok....
they dont take your age as a factor 1..
i take before.. only got 4 diff age group to put a tick beside it.
and i paid like 60+ bucks just to know me iq is only 122... above average.. but still not clever enough.
anyway... i just feel damn cheated when i took the iq test..Originally posted by Gedanken:Buddy boy, I'm the one who gets paid to conduct such tests, and a losuy sixty bucks puts you in the bargain-basement range.
Exactamundo. What you're alluding to is Spearman's g, and as I've said before, since Charles Spearman introduced the concept in 1904, nobody, and I mean nobody, has found a way to measure it directly - they can only measure verbal, numerical, visuospatial and other abilities and simply allude to g as a latent factor. Put simply, if anybody can say he can measure how intelligent you are, he's full of it.Originally posted by spadeTwo:anyway... i just feel damn cheated when i took the iq test..
was phsychoed by a friend to do it 1...
and i dun trust such stuffs.
dun really think it can be measured just by language/maths/speed of reaction and thinking/diagrams and other dumb questions..