then the first reason lea?Originally posted by the Bear:there is no such word as 'flammable'
the actual word is 'inflammable' but some people think it means that the thing cannot catch fire.. so the 'in' was dropped for some reason...
hmm....try to burn the inflammerble thingOriginally posted by bo liao:flammable means can "burn,ignit,combust"
Those carry lpg tanks lorry got stick "flammerber" Danger...
got this "inflammerble" word mea?
ask u study dun study.
where got object cannot burn, even diamond burn at 4got how many degrees...Originally posted by MyPillowTalks:hmm....try to burn the inflammerble thing![]()
Why must 'onomatopoeia' sound like what it is? It's just a name for the kind of words it represents, doesn't necessarily have to be one itself.Originally posted by MyPillowTalks:Why hor...the word onomatopoeia(dunno spelling correct or not) does not sound like wad it is....
and
Why does flammable and inflammable mean the same thing one har?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Because this is englishOriginally posted by MyPillowTalks:Why hor...the word onomatopoeia(dunno spelling correct or not) does not sound like wad it is....
and
Why does flammable and inflammable mean the same thing one har?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
i cant pronounce thatOriginally posted by laurence82:supercalifragilisticexpialidocious