How is this a cohesive argument?Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:If you know you are delusional, you wont be.![]()
![]()
![]()
How is this a cohesive argument?Originally posted by jondizzle foshizzle: 16 October 2007 · 08:42 PMAsk your tutor for help man seriously, that sentence didn't even make sense. Oh yeah and you proved my point yet again.
Originally posted by jondizzle foshizzle: 11 October 2007 · 12:58 PMWho are you to decide what's reality and what's not?
How is this a cohesive argument?Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:You have no idea what is real and what is not, how you can judge it?![]()
How is this a cohesive argument?Originally posted by jondizzle foshizzle: 11 October 2007 · 10:29 PMI'm not judging it, you are lol. You said God isn't a reality so therefore you're judging what's real and what's not. You just contradicted yourself lol
How is this a cohesive argument?Originally posted by jondizzle foshizzle:Well no sh*t I can't give you evidence, nobody can give you evidence on the existence of God. LOL even a 10 year old understands you can't prove the existence of God and you don't? Fuckin retard.
You have no proof and no evidence and according to you even a 10 year old knows it and yet you insist that God/god is real?Please show me where I've insisted that God is real. I think you need to be admitted to an institution because you're starting to hallucinate.
1. I asked you to show us where you made a coherent argument and you cannot, so you side-stepped the issue and instead you ask me to "Please copy and paste one of my incoherent arguments here" and you go on to say "If you can't do something as simple as that then you're proving that there aren't any incoherent arguments"Originally posted by jondizzle foshizzle: 16 October 2007 · 08:55 PM and 16 October 2007 · 09:35 PMlol I'm not sidestepping the challenge, you are. Please copy and paste one of my incoherent arguments here. If you can't do something as simple as that then you're proving that there aren't any incoherent arguments and my arguments ARE coherent. So if you're so against sidestepping challenges how about you take up mine instead of sidestepping it hmmm?
AHHAHA man you really are an idiot. I can't believe a grown man like you need to be explained to the meaning of such a simple post. It's simple, if you can't find any incoherent posts then that means that there aren't any. And we can both assume that there are posts. So if those posts aren't incoherent then they must be coherent.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:
You have no idea how stupid what you write sound.
1. I asked you to show us where you made a coherent argument and you cannot, so you side-stepped the issue and instead you ask me to "Please copy and paste one of my incoherent arguments here" and you go on to say "If you can't do something as simple as that then you're proving that there aren't any incoherent arguments"
What gross stupidity is that? Please argue why (this is beginning to be quite fun now that you are trying earnestly to make sense and falling flat on your face); please argue why "If you can't do something as simple as that then you're proving that there aren't any incoherent arguments"
![]()
![]()
There is so much stupidity in what you write in your last few posts but let's start with this one.
If there are no posts with coherent arguments, which you failed to produce, it means that while there are posts, there are no posts with "coherent arguments".Originally posted by jondizzle foshizzle:AHHAHA man you really are an idiot. I can't believe a grown man like you need to be explained to the meaning of such a simple post. It's simple, if you can't find any incoherent posts then that means that there aren't any. And we can both assume that there are posts. So if those posts aren't incoherent then they must be coherent.
Geez man throughout this thread I've been constantly explaining to you what my posts mean. I'm beginning to feel like the mother of a curious retarded 5 year old.
o.... k........ should I welcome you back?Originally posted by fatslob:Cohesion is a crutch.
btw, i'm back![]()
u just didOriginally posted by AndrewPKYap:o.... k........ should I welcome you back?
and that was an answerOriginally posted by AndrewPKYap:hellooooooo... that was a question k?
I r always hereOriginally posted by AndrewPKYap:*sigh* never met anyone so keen for a welcome... OK welcome back! and where have you been?
HAHAHAHHAHA OMG WTF well I think you're most likely ARE a retarded kid from the way you're sounding. You can't even identify an argument. Please read a dictionary you stupid, stupid person. An argument is a verbal disagreement and throughout this post I've been disagreeing with a lot of the things you and some other people have been saying.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:If there are no posts with coherent arguments, which you failed to produce, it means that while there are posts, there are no posts with "coherent arguments".
How can I produce for you posts with incoherent arguments when you did not make any posts with an argument until this argument we are engaged in? Idiot, you don't even know what making an argument is.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
and where is the post that you made with a coherent argument? Idiot, you can't even produce one. I think you ARE a mother of a retarded kid... its in your genes.![]()
HAHAHAHAHAH OMG WTF U DONT EVEN KNOW WAT AN ARGUMENT IS HAHAHAH ROFLMAOROFLROFLBBQ!!!1!eleven!!Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:hahahahaha stupidest person I have ever met, can ask people to check the dictionary some more....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
an argument is a verbal disagreement? hahahahahaha no wonder you are write such stupid rubbish
no point I teach you anything, I should just let you continue in your stupidity....
You made my day with your stupidity.![]()
![]()
![]()
