For a start, it is never about defending my technology. I am merely seeking an opinion of wad others would do with such technology on hand.Originally posted by Where Is God:So you are unable to defend your "technology", am i right? Do you even know half of what you are talking about? Or are you just blabbering what you remember from the Star Trek you watched last night.
huh? So if I today say, I will live forever, you should believe me? You will only know if I'm calling bluff till you see I've died? So should I start selling medicine that claims to let you live forever, since I'm a living evidence?? I can give you best price, for being my first customer.Originally posted by NewAgeSensitiveBoy:For a start, it is never about defending my technology. I am merely seeking an opinion of wad others would do with such technology on hand.
It is your choice to remain a skeptic and I respect that.
And just becos you haven't seen God doesn't prove that He doesn't exists. The sad part about this technology is that like God, you will only know if I'm calling bluff till you see something like what I've describe.
cheers![]()
VCs around the world has been fed similar tales, let alone govt entities. Do you think anyone will give you credence, to give you funding?Originally posted by NewAgeSensitiveBoy:That I am aware. The question about upscaling commercially has been considered while designing the device and it has been designed in a way where it can be practically applied.
The consideration of marketing this technology is always the case of obsoleting other industries and professions ie. oil, so yes, we are taking the consipracy as you have mentioned very seriously which is why the device has been dismantled and parts held by various parties jus to calm our paranoid psychology![]()
good response.. respeck~Originally posted by NewAgeSensitiveBoy:Thanks for all your reply.
It is indeed true that there has been many claims around the world of such concept. just go into youtube and type "free energy" and countless of such devises will be available for viewing and there's no way of proving its authenticity.
I think the question in mind for us right now is who shall we approach and how do we go about doing it, bearing in mind that such tech will obsolete several industry and that such line has to be threaded carefully.
Our priority would of course be money but then, further to that we would like to open this technology to a party that is willing to apply it and not somebody who buys and shelve it to protect their rice bowl.
I appreciate all the responses recieved, positive and skeptic cos it gives me a feel of the reaction that to anticipate when we've decided our audience to approach...![]()
I'm dead sure it's not possible. Anyway FBI, when was your 6666th post?Originally posted by FBI:hmm that means 1 batt equal to 2 batt?
And from Wikipedia:
3. The source of energy is the Electric shockwave that is created within the circuit as of any circuit will generate.
I'm sorry, but saying electric shockwave in a circuit is like saying swimming in air. Electric shockwave can only be present through an electromagnetic field in the absence of a physical medium, whereas, circuit implies a a closed path through which an electric current flows. Saying that a shockwave exist in a circuit is paradoxical and nonsensical.
Yup, energy cannot be created or destroyed. So I believe whatever energy that was harnessed from EM waves and whatsoever originated from the battery itself. So it's like a 1 = 1 thing. Furthermore, it would probably lose minute amount of energy here and there to the environment because of movement of electrons etc.
Like an ordinary wave, a shock wave carries energy and can propagate through a medium (solid, liquid or gas), or, in special cases, through a field such as the electromagnetic field in the absence of a physical medium.
I highly doubt anyone has such a patent.Originally posted by kenn3th:shh, too much info, best is you go google up and check if someone had beaten you to that, and next, quickly patent it.
Kindly stop using the loaded words "ignored sources". Engineers prefer untapped waste or free energy.Originally posted by NewAgeSensitiveBoy:It is indeed true tat since energy cannot be created nor destroyed, 1 unit of power cannot generate more than 1 unit of output. Given our most efficient power plant in Senoko, it could only generate an efficiency 40-50% of power conversion from natural gas, the remaining lost through sound, heat and vibration energy.
However, try thinking from the perspective of say a waterdam generating electricity where the regulating of the turbine and water flow is controlled by technicians with a mere push of buttons. And try converting this concept to a battery where the source at this point of discussion is actually acting as a triggering force to draw energy from electrons within the circuit rather than a supplying force.
Hence, yes it is not possible to transfer 1 unit of power from a battery to convert it to 2 units, but very much possible if this 1 unit is used as a trigger to draw energy from "ignored sources" and convert it to useable electricity where the laws of physics is not violated.
As for the question about why bringing this topic on a general public forum, firstly, the ultimate consumers would be the general public like you and I. Thus I feel it would be beneficial for us to understand the general opinion prior to arriving at a decision of our approach to its application and revelations.
Thank you![]()
Well, til present, though with much delay, there has yet to be any facts proving them otherwiseOriginally posted by limywv:this sounds like steorn's fakeass technology
This is deadly serious stuff. Better ask Hilarion for serious advice, seriously. Take heed, Mr NewAgeBoy, this is waaayyy too important to play play.Originally posted by NewAgeSensitiveBoy:My group of engineers have recently discovered a technology that managed to tap on eletro-magnetic force tat is generated within an eletric circuit and convert it to usable electricity.... ok now, what should i do with it?