Today on the MRT...
-
dun change topic leh..Originally posted by jondizzle foshizzle:I dunno, guess certain people have such boring, messed up lives that they have nothing better to do than flame me with irrelevant topics.
shoot me back u dumb fcuk -
Originally posted by Ignorance:
Again you're making up bullcrap, I only said CERTAIN SOFT DRUGS weren't addictive. And if you knew anything about how easily it is to obtain drugs you'd know that if children and teenagers wanted to get them they could easily do so WHETHER OR NOT IT'S ILLEGAL.
the current anti drug campaign isn't going nowhere.
u dun see people consuming drugs anywhere in singapore right?
tell me, if drugs didn't exist in the first place, is there even a need to legalize them?
so ban them!
prevent our children and the teenagers from getting in contact with them!
and thus, they will have 0 chance of getting addicted.
instead of protecting them, you are instead offering drugs to them.
tell me, u fcuking pea brain
oh and ya. i rmb u saying that drugs are not addictive and ppl can quit anytime they want. why did u use the word addicts in ur post?
dubm fcuk[/b]
Guess you're too blindly overzealous about banning drugs when you know nothing about them. I remember you had to get all your information of a single webpage from wikipedia to support your point. Really shows your level of knowledge about it. So please stop arguing about things you really know absolutely nothing about, it makes you look stupid.
EDIT: And if you know ANYTHING about Holland's drug war you'd know that it's the most successful out of any countries. YOU KNOW WHY?? Because they're taking a step towards not enforcing their drug laws, they ALLOW people to smoke marijuana and ALLOW people to sell it. They make distinctions between hard, addictive drugs and non-addictive soft drugs. They pretty much try to follow what I've been saying and THEIR DRUG WAR HAS BEEN THE MOST EFFECTIVE OUT OF ANY COUNTRY THAT JUST BANS DRUGS ENTIRELY WITH HARSH PUNISHMENT IF YOU BREAK THAT LAW. -
Oh I see, you're now wanting an argument just for the hell of it. Guess your life really is sad and miserable. I feel so sorry for you...maybe it makes your balls feel bigger, acting tough on the internet. Well whatever floats your boatOriginally posted by Ignorance:dun change topic leh..
shoot me back u dumb fcuk
-
easy to get hold of drugs?Originally posted by jondizzle foshizzle:Again you're making up bullcrap, I only said CERTAIN SOFT DRUGS weren't addictive. And if you knew anything about how easily it is to obtain drugs you'd know that if children and teenagers wanted to get them they could easily do so WHETHER OR NOT IT'S ILLEGAL.
Guess you're too blindly overzealous about banning drugs when you know nothing about them. I remember you had to get all your information of a single webpage from wikipedia to support your point. Really shows your level of knowledge about it. So please stop arguing about things you really know absolutely nothing about, it makes you look stupid.
EDIT: And if you know ANYTHING about Holland's drug war you'd know that it's the most successful out of any countries. YOU KNOW WHY?? Because they're taking a step towards not enforcing their drug laws, they ALLOW people to smoke marijuana and ALLOW people to sell it. They make distinctions between hard, addictive drugs and non-addictive soft drugs. They pretty much try to follow what I've been saying and THEIR DRUG WAR HAS BEEN THE MOST EFFECTIVE OUT OF ANY COUNTRY THAT JUST BANS DRUGS ENTIRELY WITH HARSH PUNISHMENT IF YOU BREAK THAT LAW.
this does not apply to my and my friends ard me.
and oh..i didnt get information from wikipedia. the person ur referring to in not me u dumb fcuk.
and oh read this "Most cross-state comparisons in the United States (as well as in Australia; see McGeorge and Aitken, 1997) have found no significant differences in the prevalence of marijuana use in decriminalized and nondecriminalized states (e.g., Johnston et al., 1981; Single, 1989; DiNardo and Lemieux, 1992; Thies and Register, 1993). Even in the few studies that find an effect on prevalence, it is a weak one. For example, using pooled data from the National Household Survey of Drug Abuse for 1988, 1990 and 1991, Saffer and Chaloupka (1995) found that marijuana decriminalization increased past-year marijuana use by 6 to 7 percent and past-month use by 4 to 5 percent. Using Monitoring The Future survey data for 1982 and 1989, Chaloupka et al. (199
estimated that decriminalizing marijuana in all states would raise the number of youths using marijuana in a given year by 4 to 5 percent compared with the number using it when marijuana use is criminalized in all states; however, they also found no relationship between decriminalization and past-month use or frequency of use."
dumb fcuk -
i m sure ur referring ur to urself u numskullOriginally posted by jondizzle foshizzle:Oh I see, you're now wanting an argument just for the hell of it. Guess your life really is sad and miserable. I feel so sorry for you...maybe it makes your balls feel bigger, acting tough on the internet. Well whatever floats your boat 
who was that piece of sh!t who create the topic allow drugs in sg? -
this is
-
AHHAHAHAHAH OMFG U JUST SUPPORTED MY POINT THAT DECRIMINALISATION WONT REALLY INCREASE ITS USE HAHAHAHAHAHHA MAN THANKS SOOOO MUCH THANK YOU THANK YOUOriginally posted by Ignorance:easy to get hold of drugs?
this does not apply to my and my friends ard me.
and oh..i didnt get information from wikipedia. the person ur referring to in not me u dumb fcuk.
and oh read this "Most cross-state comparisons in the United States (as well as in Australia; see McGeorge and Aitken, 1997) have found no significant differences in the prevalence of marijuana use in decriminalized and nondecriminalized states (e.g., Johnston et al., 1981; Single, 1989; DiNardo and Lemieux, 1992; Thies and Register, 1993). Even in the few studies that find an effect on prevalence, it is a weak one. For example, using pooled data from the National Household Survey of Drug Abuse for 1988, 1990 and 1991, Saffer and Chaloupka (1995) found that marijuana decriminalization increased past-year marijuana use by 6 to 7 percent and past-month use by 4 to 5 percent. Using Monitoring The Future survey data for 1982 and 1989, Chaloupka et al. (199 estimated that decriminalizing marijuana in all states would raise the number of youths using marijuana in a given year by 4 to 5 percent compared with the number using it when marijuana use is criminalized in all states; however, they also found no relationship between decriminalization and past-month use or frequency of use."
dumb fcuk
-
The only reason why this thread reaches 6 pages is cos of the ongoing flame war...
-
It's going to be over soon, the idiot just took my side by agreeing that decriminalising marijuana won't increase it's usage. Thanks again retardOriginally posted by wonderamazement:The only reason why this thread reaches 6 pages is cos of the ongoing flame war...