Just to add on, the reason the entire process of getting machines to output odds values is because of the circular process of the whole thing. An assumption is made in this process that violates statistics:Originally posted by Stoat:An accurate discription. However there is one thing I would like to add. Past performance is never an accurate indicator of future success. You can have the machine backtest historical figures and spit out all the charts you want, there is still a good possibility that the end result differs from what actually happens. The only reason why machines are used is because institutional investors handle extremely large sums of money everyday. They are never a substitute for the skill of the investor in setting the terms and conditions for the machine to determine the result.
To the home investor, I would suggest taking a course on reading financial ratios which are crucial to fundamental analysis.
I rank:
Fundamental Analysis:60%
Technical Analysis*:10%
Luck:30%
*what the machine does
Huh, now there is "bankroll management " again? So "odds ARE everything or not?Originally posted by deathbait:But i'll elaborate a little here. If you want to make money from investments, odds are everything. If you want to avoid going broke, bankroll management is important. Risk vs Reward. The age old question of finding the balance.
but if you depend on his mantra that he was "not afraid to say it again. Odds are everything."Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:Let me make a record...
Originally posted by deathbait: 23 November 2007 · 01:44 PM
"And i'm not afraid to say it again. Odds are everything."
It can make you go broke.... !!!!!!!Originally posted by deathbait:But i'll elaborate a little here. If you want to make money from investments, odds are everything. If you want to avoid going broke,, bankroll management is important. Risk vs Reward. The age old question of finding the balance.
wow ok. I can take it when you misquote me to attack me. I can tolerate it when you insult me and my mom. But i will not take it lying down when you misquote me to mislead the public.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:It took him 13 farking pages to finally admit that if you take his advice that "odds ARE everything" "you can go broke..."![]()
![]()
![]()
Here's an updated warning. Do not take credit where credit is undeserved. You have shown absolutely zero knowledge in the realms of investment. Taking credit for disparaging me is absolutely scrapping the bottom of the barrel.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:... and I can tell you that "bankroll management" is only another one of many other considerations that you have to consider... farking ass-hole... come here and tell people that "odds ARE everything ... " and if I did not push and insult him endlessly, he would not have admitted that "it can make you go broke..."![]()
![]()
![]()
Just in case any of you have been poisoned by the above line, note that Andrew is urging everyone to play with scared money. That's what it means when you take into consideration your bankroll when drawing up investment strategy.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:... and I can tell you that "bankroll management" is only another one of many other considerations that you have to consider... [/i]
Can be applied either way. Forex trading is more volatile, leading to higher risk. That is the main difference. Higher variance is what prompts Andrew to treat Forex as gambling. That is absurd.Originally posted by Gazelle:Are we talking about forex trading or equity investment?
reality is.... andrew is out of his element in whatever he wants to talk about... all he has is his personal definition of what the world is.Originally posted by deathbait:Andrew claims he was a commodities futures trader. He is entirely out of his element here when he claims to know what forex trading is like.
to be fair... we did try to gather proof evidence..... amazon, kino.... no proof of the existence of the book.....Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:Please continue speculating... I want to see how much foolishness and crapz people that depend on illusions and delusions in their mind, instead of proof and evidence, can generate....![]()
Originally posted by Chin Eng:reality is.... andrew is out of his element in whatever he wants to talk about... all he has is his personal definition of what the world is.
but this page is quite fun, when andrew has gone down so low that i wasn't even sure it was possible of himboy-o-boy.... the profanities.....
exposure?Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:![]()
![]()
![]()
Mr Chin Eng, Mr Chin Eng....
You have no idea what you, he and I are talking about or I have no idea what he is talking about?
I asked him for 12 pages if there is something else to consider but he keeps insisting, no "odds ARE everything... "
Then, after 12 pages he decided that he could not escape the exposure.... and admitted that if you only consider odds, you can go broke.... and "odds are NOT everything... "![]()
![]()
and you have to consider things like "bankroll management" ..... hmmmm I wonder what else you have to consider...![]()
![]()
If you ask him, he will tell you: "odds ARE everything... "
I don't know anything about forex trading... ? and I have never traded forex... ? hahahaha I have even traded, for example Deuschmarks Options, if you know what those are....![]()
![]()
... but you are a bastard... you don't even gamble or speculate... and so you are safe... hey, you have to think of other people mah... what if some kid like you own children comes into the forum and goes away thinking... "odds ARE everything... " ?
What if some kid like your children PM him and ask him if they can open an account with his company....![]()
![]()
![]()
Yah sure, trading strategy only considers odds and does not take into account that everyone loses in the end...Originally posted by deathbait:exposure?
As I have explained numerous times in the past(and you chose to ignore everytime), odds are everything when we were discussing trading strategies. That was the context it was used in, and i stand by it. You do not look at your bankroll when you're determining strategy. Of course, I do not expect Andrew to understand what I just said, judging from his lack of understanding of what "strategy" means.
I'm not backpedalling here. I'm branching into another aspect of investment that Andrew has never touched on, which was risk management. It is independant of trading strategy, and should remain so.
Andrew, if you claim you were indeed well versed in the art of trading, perhaps you need to explain why you lie through your teeth. No trader worth his salt will discount the importance of odds. No trader worth his salt will fail to recognise the seperation between trading strategy and risk management.
One can only conclude that either you were never an accomplished trader, or you're just lying to the general public about what it takes to trade.
I have given you the chance to apologise. This is a reminder that you now have less than a day to apologise to everyone for delibrately spreading disinformation. Do not make me come down on you. Take the high road. Admit your mistakes.
Even a fool with half a brain knows that even when the odds favour you considerably, there's always a chance of failure. Trying to grab this as a weapon against my arguments is really clutching at straws. Trust me, just give up. And yes, if there's one thing I would ever teach my kids, it would be to give great concern to the odds before trying anything.
You do a great disfavor to yours by not telling them that.
actually my stand is simply this, we all have our prerogative to do whatever we want with our lives.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:... but you are a bastard... you don't even gamble or speculate... and so you are safe... hey, you have to think of other people mah... what if some kid like you own children comes into the forum and goes away thinking... "odds ARE everything... " ?
What if some kid like your children PM him and ask him if they can open an account with his company....![]()
![]()
![]()
Originally posted by Chin Eng:You said "... do you think i give a shit?" and for those not skilled in deciphering " shit " it is sh.it
actually my stand is simply this, we all have our prerogative to do whatever we want with our lives.
you want to gamble, gamble,
you want to call chicken, call chicken,
you want to call me bastard, call lah.... do you think i give a shit?
you want to eat at char kway teow store masquerading a hooker's den, do whatever you want lah....
likewise, i tell my children, you can say bad words if you choose to. i can't stop you, but as person with an independent brain, you can choose - choose to gamble, choose to use profanity (like yourself) etc.... i believe i have raise my children wise enough for them to make the right choices.
... nonetheless, there is really nothing wrong with "odds are everything". it is probably a very simplified form of "i have make my accessment on this particular issue and have weight the pros and cons and have come to a conclusion that the outcome of the said issue will result in a manner in which i predict that it will result in"
my only issue now is, mr yap, [b]where the hell is your book! you've talked enough about proof and evidence.... so i am asking for it. i am sure you are able to provide this proof..... if you have it![/b]
This is the first time that the word shit has be defined as profanity, inspite of the fact that the filter here does so.... therefore is your definition of profanity dependent on the filter? bear in mind that this profanity filter also filters out cock which in reality is a male chicken..... but, yup, you are funny.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:You said "... do you think i give a shit?" and for those not skilled in deciphering " shit " it is sh.it
Mr Chin Eng, you want to laugh at people for using profanity, can't you control yourself and not use vulgarities while you are in the process ofat people for using profanities?
how can you....? you don't know me.... so stop pretending to know me.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:You say that "i believe i have raise my children wise enough for them to make the right choices"... .. and I beg to differ.
again you pretend to know me..... of course i taught my children according to what i believe to be true, i also taught my children to test whether what i teach them is really true or not.... they are on their own journey of self-discovery... at the end if they want to be a taoist or a buddhist, or an atheist, it's their business. whatever they become, they do not stop being my children.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:You have taught your children a set of beliefs... and you have done them a disfavor, because, if they lose their beliefs, that would be tragic. You have not taught them how to make wise decisions... you cannot because you yourself do not know how to, you depend on beliefs.
... and how do people ensure that they are making wise decisions? ahhhhh... that is another thing you need to know....![]()
![]()
![]()