Gambling, like forex trading, never pays....
-
you do not want to discuss "but odds ARE everything" anymore?
-
... you realized what a stupid statement it was and how stupid you were to say "but odds ARE everything" now? Really?
-
You want a discussion? Pleas explain clearly why "but odds ARE everything" and why it is not a grossly stupid statement to make....
-
if you would stop skipping lines when you read, u'll notice that my posts have been littered with my stand that odds are everything.
I'm just killing time, waiting for your rebuttal. You can't go to a debate and say the opponent team's argument is stupid and not worth your time. Show me why it's stupid. Explain. Details. You like diagrams and graphs. Draw me a few.
But for the love of god, rebuttal please. -
and i have no idea how you missed it, but i have 2 huge posts going into detail why odds should be the only thing you should be concerned about when entering a transaction.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:You want a discussion? Pleas explain clearly why "but odds ARE everything" and why it is not a grossly stupid statement to make.... -
oh btw, a loose defination of a gambler in poker terms is:
one who focuses on wins and losses, but never on the odds.
yes andrew, it's time to finally google and find out what odds are.
But i'll save you the trouble. Odds is another term for probability of winning/losing.
By the way(for the handful of you still amused enough to read this),andrew has repeatedly stressed on wins and losses. I don't know about you guys, but this gives me the giggles. -
all I need to do is show you one, yes one thing to destroy your position "but odds ARE everything" ... you don't even know that do you? *sigh* when you are so stupid... don't try to act smart...
go ahead, give us one example why it is impossible for odds to be EVERYTHING... and then change your position.... saving yourself more embarrassment... -
you have no qualms about talking about my mother eating sh1t. Never batted an eyelid when suggesting that i'm made of sh1t.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:all I need to do is show you one, yes one thing to destroy your position "but odds ARE everything" ... you don't even know that do you? *sigh* when you are so stupid... don't try to act smart...
go ahead, give us one example why it is impossible for odds to be EVERYTHING... and then change your position.... saving yourself more embarrassment...
BUT
you're considerate enough to "save me from embarrassment"?
He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword.
Show me. -
mmm
take your time making up stuff
i'll check back at your fantasies later tonight andrew.
good luck -
So now you want to resort to lying? How more stupid can you get? Are you too stupid to know that people can refer back to the previous posts?Originally posted by deathbait:you have no qualms about talking about my mother eating sh1t. Never batted an eyelid when suggesting that i'm made of sh1t.
BUT
you're considerate enough to "save me from embarrassment"?
He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword.
Show me.
Care to point to us where I said your mother ate sh!t, the page, the date and time to prove that you are not a grossly stupid liar?
If you cannot refer us back to the page date and time, you have to concede that you are a grossly stupid liar.... -
... if you don't know why making statements like:
odds ARE everything...
money is everything...
education is everything...
religion is everything...
love is everything...
is grossly stupid... then I was right all along not to reply to your rubbish... you are just simply too stupid... -
... you base all you comments and posts on the idea that " but odds ARE everything" and you want people to response to your stupidity? What a waste of time....
-
you want me to quote, the quote i shall provide.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:like I said, when I am bored I will pawned stupid people.... and this is such profound stupidity it is an opportunity not to be missed...
... and you probably think that your life started when your mother gave birth to you when your life could have very well started from dog sh!t
Let me explain. The dog sh!ts near a papaya tree... and the papaya tree used the components of the dog sh!t to produce a papaya and your mother ate the papaya and the papaya that has components of dog sh!t in it, got used by your mother's body to produce that egg that became you....
You see? Your life started from dog sh!t, case proven...
... a grossly stupid person that does not know that there are many things he is ignorant of....
moving on.
you seem to have no trouble replying to me as long as it does not require you to answer any hard questions. You repeatedly say that you can, but with a single piece of evidence, prove my entire argument wrong, but refuse to present it, citing "it's too stupid" or "it's not worth my time".
I'm sorry kid.
That doesn't work in the grown up world.
By the way, you're allowed to make sweeping statements when the statement itself contains everything.
"Men have heads" is a pretty sweeping statement. Doesn't mean it isn't true.
So really, stop dealing with rhetorics and start giving me hard arguments. Evidence. Pictures. A doodle if you prefer. But please, argue like the grown up you claim to be. -
not to say that the statement above is incorrect.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:... you base all you comments and posts on the idea that " but odds ARE everything" and you want people to response to your stupidity? What a waste of time....
But I have made many other simple questions to you that you have refused to answer.
I gave you 5 hours lad. I expected a decent reply. It appears you have wasted them. I've seen kindergarten kids who have made more persuasive arguments.
You're all wise and mighty when you're giving speeches aren't you. But a few simple questions and suddenly you're talking like a toddler. -
I'm still waiting for your evidence that would supposedly shatter my entire position on the matter.
You threw down the gauntlet, not me.
I'm calling your bluff.
Time to settle this.
You've named the challenge and I have agreed to face you. Go on, don't be afraid to hurt my feelings.
You've come this far, conjuring senseless arguments over 4 pages of posts. Go on, embarrass me with your "facts", and let's end this.
Or maybe you can't?
I'm gonna make a prediction here: your next post will rougly go like this:
1) if deathbait can't understand why he's so stupid, he's too stupid for me to bother answering him.
2) *repeated usage of words like "gross" and "stupidity"*
3) Embark on yet another meaningless sidetracking argument that has nothing to do with the topic, or the argument at hand
4) Find new ways to insult deathbait, resulting in insults that sound suprisingly familiar
The one singular prediction that is definitely going to happen:
*****Andrew will not be answering any of my questions***** -
If let's say people like deathbait is your patient (THIS IS ONLY AN EXAMPLE. NO OFFENSE TO deathbait), are you planning to say: you are already beyond hopeless. I can't help you anymore.
is it meaningful????
You might as well don't write anything since we all know that there is risk involved in any speculation.
What type of "crusader" is that, telling people that they are hopeless and stupid.
do you even make yourself clear in every statement? Or is this the style you practice in your book?
When you have intercourse with your partner, you are speculating that condom protects you from STDs (but in fact, only at 99.99%), that your partner is HIV -ve (how sure are you? any test? seroconversion? even then it is only 99.9% accurate), that your partner is STDs free (how sure are you again?)
Why do you even want to have sex when speculation is involved.
Why do you even bother to eat since you are speculating that this food won't cause you to fall sick (or diarrhea, food poisoning).
You also make a speculation that your book will sell well. Does this not contradict your anti-speculation stand?
At least me and deathbait offer unbiased view on forex. we clearly state that it involves risk and only trade when you know how to. even then risk is still there. -
If let's say people like deathbait is your patient (THIS IS ONLY AN EXAMPLE. NO OFFENSE TO deathbait), are you planning to say: you are already beyond hopeless. I can't help you anymore.
is it meaningful????
You might as well don't write anything since we all know that there is risk involved in any speculation.
What type of "crusader" is that, telling people that they are hopeless and stupid.
do you even make yourself clear in every statement? Or is this the style you practice in your book?
When you have intercourse with your partner, you are speculating that condom protects you from STDs (but in fact, only at 99.99%), that your partner is HIV -ve (how sure are you? any test? seroconversion? even then it is only 99.9% accurate), that your partner is STDs free (how sure are you again?)
Why do you even want to have sex when speculation is involved.
Why do you even bother to eat since you are speculating that this food won't cause you to fall sick (or diarrhea, food poisoning).
You also make a speculation that your book will sell well. Does this not contradict your anti-speculation stand?
At least me and deathbait does not offer an extreme view. we clearly state that it involves risk and only trade when you know how to. even then risk is still there. -
erm... actually hor why like that ah??
Seems like there is flaming in every thread I saw relating to Andrew.
Didn't read from the beginning. Just picked up from this page. Dun no what the hell is happening. Didn't bother too.
-
Of course not, when your comments proceeded from the inane and meaningless "odds ARE everything" and yet you have no idea why "odds ARE everything" is a grossly stupid statement to make. It is a strategic error. Once you make the strategic mistake... your questions and comments are in error... since they are formed with the grossly stupid idea "odds ARE everything" ... which I judge to be and you admittedOriginally posted by deathbait:*****Andrew will not be answering any of my questions*****Originally posted by deathbait: 20 November 2007 · 08:29 AModds ARE everything ...
Of course, when people are hopeless and stupid, it is better not to lie and just inform them of the truth.Originally posted by ultranova3:is it meaningful????
You might as well don't write anything since we all know that there is risk involved in any speculation.
What type of "crusader" is that, telling people that they are hopeless and stupid.
Like I told you many many times, there is risk taking and stupidity....
Casino gambling and forex speculating falls falls into the category of stupidity... I even gave you the link to show you the proof...
[/quote]I think the book is this one...The Futures Game: Who Wins, Who Loses, & Why: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why (Hardcover)
Like selling drugs for example... if you sell illegal drugs in Singapore, is that risk taking or stupidity? STUPIDITY.
by Richard J. Teweles (Author), Frank, J. Jones (Author) "This is a book about trading futures ..." (more) -
The one singular prediction that is definitely going to happen:
*****Andrew will not be answering any of my questions*****Of course not, when your comments proceeded from the inane and meaningless "odds ARE everything" and yet you have no idea why "odds ARE everything" is a grossly stupid statement to make. It is a strategic error. Once you make the strategic mistake... your questions and comments are in error... since they are formed with the grossly stupid idea "odds ARE everything" ... which I judge to be and you admitted
am i better at predicting or what?
"Strategic error". That's the second time you've used it, and in a sentence which guarantees it makes no sense in. I see you've been reduced to babbling now, stringing random words into sentences. I can barely understand that paragraph of yours.
You reduced to babbling....somehow i feel warm inside.Casino gambling and forex speculating falls falls into the category of stupidity... I even gave you the link to show you the proof...
I think the book is this one...
quote:The Futures Game: Who Wins, Who Loses, & Why: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why (Hardcover)
by Richard J. Teweles (Author), Frank, J. Jones (Author) "This is a book about trading futures ..." (more)
Like selling drugs for example... if you sell illegal drugs in Singapore, is that risk taking or stupidity? STUPIDITY.[/quote]
I have on my shelf a book that tells me the world is ending in 2000. Another that tells me it ended in 2004. Yet another charming book tells me that aliens built the pyramids.
But let's not talk about the myriad of books readily available that spread false information(such as yours). The one you quoted may actually be a good book for all i know. But i do notice that the "winners" get top billing in the title over the "losers". Perhaps you need to finish reading the book and get to the winning part? You've proven yourself to skip lines, even entire posts when you don't like reading them. Perhaps you need to read the whole book this time? Not just the chapter that vindicates your opinion.
Oh, and now you're comparing gambling/forex to trading drugs. Wow. Just wow. I am without words. -
quote:Originally posted by deathbait:
I notice you once again skipped past my post that proved you talked about sh!t and whatnot. Please read it and give me the apology you are of course going to offer, judging by the SHOCK you seem to have that you would ever say that about me.
you have no qualms about talking about my mother eating sh1t. Never batted an eyelid when suggesting that i'm made of sh1t.
BUT
you're considerate enough to "save me from embarrassment"?
He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword.
Show me.
So now you want to resort to lying? How more stupid can you get? Are you too stupid to know that people can refer back to the previous posts?
Care to point to us where I said your mother ate sh!t, the page, the date and time to prove that you are not a grossly stupid liar?
If you cannot refer us back to the page date and time, you have to concede that you are a grossly stupid liar....
By the way, you now need to apologise for calling me a liar too.all I need to do is show you one, yes one thing to destroy your position "but odds ARE everything" ... you don't even know that do you? *sigh* when you are so stupid... don't try to act smart...
I've long accepted your challenge to destroy my position. You have been short in coming up with that "one thing" necessary to break it. I'm sorry Andrew. Here in the grown up world, if you make threats, and the recipient tells you to bring it on, you actually have to either concede or bring the goods. I notice you've done neither. As usual, ignoring posts that you do not like to see is the strategy of the day.
go ahead, give us one example why it is impossible for odds to be EVERYTHING... and then change your position.... saving yourself more embarrassment...
Seriously. Did you think I was a confused teenage boy, so hampered by my pride that I would back down, afraid to call that silly bluff? Let battle be joined. Tell the world that one thing that would break down my arguments and end this farce.
Of course you can't. You were making blind threats. And now all you can do is impotently make random posts of why you can't answer my questions because they are too stupid. Nevermind that most of them are simple yes/no answers.
Ok, i'll admit it. Most of my questions would indeed incriminate you if you actually answered them properly. Isn't that the main reason why you refuse to answer any of them?
Of course now you'll start sprouting that nonsense that my views are too stupid for you to comment....nevermind the fact that you've been trying to compose a reply that will shut me up for the last 4 pages. I present you with this question once again. It is apparent that you want me to go away, and I have said I would, if you could just present that one thing you had that supposedly proved everything i said wrong. If that were indeed true, why are you procrastinating? Either you were lying, or you just enjoy calling me "grossly stupid"(that's another thing i think you should apologise for. I've proven myself much more articulate and knowledgeable than you thus far).
Which is it? -
*yawnz*
It is such a waste of time to discuss anything with people that make a grossly stupid strategic mistake that is obvious to everyone except himself/herself.
"odds ARE everything..." yah, sure...
Like stupidity IS everything.... -
your dodge count has to be in the tripple digits by now.
Like i said, if it's so simple, just elaborate. But all you do is hide behind your insults.
Like i said, these tactics don't work once you're too old for the playground.
Either we hold a reasonable discussion, or you start admitting you've been signing blank checks all along.
You once cited it was impossible and pointless to discuss anything with people only out to insult you. Are you not the source of said insults now? -
also, once more you use words you obviously don't understand.Originally posted by AndrewPKYap:*yawnz*
It is such a waste of time to discuss anything with people that make a grossly stupid strategic mistake that is obvious to everyone except himself/herself.
"odds ARE everything..." yah, sure...
Like stupidity IS everything....
Exactly why is it a 'strategic' mistake?
and in case you have not noticed, no one but yourself seem to find it obvious.
Please elaborate. Explain. Don't do it for me. Do it for the general public. You are, after all hoping to educate the public are you not? It's not all about making the quick buck, right? -