Ya lor. That is what I think so tooOriginally posted by cApitaland:financially stable =/= rich
age 30 != rich... dun see anything wrong wif her claims... imo guys at tat age(25-29) r busy fighting for career so they wun b able to dedicate time to her...Originally posted by silverng:In today's new paper, beauty queen Genecia Luo who is 25 years old seeks help from dating agency to find a bf. she wants to have a date on valentie day.
she was Miss Singapore runner up in 2006 and Miss Singapore International 2006 and also a finalist in the new paper modelling contest in 2003.
She say that she seeks the help of the dating agency although there were guys who were interested in her as she is not interested in casual dating or short term romance.
While I have nothing against a chio bu seeking help from dating agency, what really amuse me was what she say.
"Her ideal partner has to be at least 5 years older, at least the same height, supportive, financially stable and on the same spirtual wavelength. She also say that she is not high maintenance and the most expensive gifts she ever received from her lovers is an ipod and a pair of diving fins, she doesn't need a rich fella and she is low maintenance.
I am simple, down to earth and practical so guys don need to buy flowers that will die or jewellary that i will hardly use"
What I find it amusing is that if she is really so low maintenance and she don need a rich fella to be her bf, than why say that the guy must be at least 5 years older than her?
Since she is 25, why must she find a bf that is at least 30 years and older? Why can't she accept guys between the age of 25 to 29? Simple. Because guys around these age is not financially stable and also do not have a stable career yet which is why she don't want them.
And she can still claim that she don need a rich fella to be her bf..
When you have a stable career at 30, you will be even busier maintaining or trying to expand your career. So no difference.Originally posted by BrUtUs:age 30 != rich... dun see anything wrong wif her claims... imo guys at tat age(25-29) r busy fighting for career so they wun b able to dedicate time to her...
x1. Agree with the marketing gimmick.Originally posted by FireIce:marketing gimmick of the dating agency
i dun mind a depreciating asset, her looks are not everything. her character matters too.Originally posted by New Creation:x1. Agree with the marketing gimmick.
Well, she got the assets and looks so flaunt it while she can.
Because women are like depreciating assets. They can look and be damn chio at their prime, but they age day by day. There will come a time when another sweet young thing comes along and she is GONE.. Thats why Men sometimes dun like to acquire a depreciating asset (i.e. marriage) cz it is a Lose-lose affair.
Sure.. i mean only her character will stay ... and shine thru... But in the mean while, even as married couples, each party mz still maintain that aura of mystery so that each day, the husband find out something new about his wife and vice versa. Its still important to workout and keep in shape even after marriage to maintain that physical attraction lar.Originally posted by sEphIrOth:i dun mind a depreciating asset, her looks are not everything. her character matters too.
after all, being with a girl at her prime doesnt mean i should leave her after her prime. through thick or thin, right?![]()
all women looks are depreciating assets what.Originally posted by New Creation:x1. Agree with the marketing gimmick.
Well, she got the assets and looks so flaunt it while she can.
Because women are like depreciating assets. They can look and be damn chio at their prime, but they age day by day. There will come a time when another sweet young thing comes along and she is GONE.. Thats why Men sometimes dun like to acquire a depreciating asset (i.e. marriage) cz it is a Lose-lose affair.
I agree - girls are more mature than guys and for them to match in terms of maturity, 3-5 years is the norm.Originally posted by Zarks:5 years older than her bcuz at around 30. most guys are really mature ma.. 25 hmm still consider not mature for some boys.
She seeks for financially stable.. not rich la..meaning she doesnt have to take care of family if suddenly her husband no job (got fired) and looking for new job for 3 years..
Walao. Ts u really dun understand gal
uh npnt leh
beauty queen, low maintenance..
so how come she can't find a stable bf?
it's likely that there's a problem with her personality.
when it comes to affairs of the heart, it is very hard to tell.
it could be that given her status, she has problems finding people with true sincerity.
however, i am 100% certain that money is a factor. surely need to drive a nice car and have the ability to afford a nice home one
Just wondering, besides being beauty, obliviously for a beauty queen, what else does she have to offer that most chio bu dun? Oh and her self proclaim low maintenances. Kinda typical mind set most ppl have in mind ie. chi bu = high maintenance.
To me if u r a celebrity and really wish to use the help of dating agency, dun u wanna keep ur real identity anonymous? At least till the actual meeting.
Wah... a beauty with such a low criteria!!??? So easy to meet. I already know a handful of unattached man who can meet her needs.
Being able to join a beauty pageant, she is probably quite mature in nature so I don't find anything wrong with her age requirements.
I agree though that it's a advertisement gimmick! Hundreds of man will seek that agency liao!!
got picture? ![]()
aiya. the dating agency wanted to hire her to be their spokesperson.. then they smart turn the advertising campaign around.. this may generate more publicity
the photo..
can see? i dunno how to use this new forum..