Received this interesting read from email....
THE 5 LOGICS SYSTEMS:
Emotional Logic
This Logic works entirely on emotions and has the tendency and power to overwrite the other Logics below. Examples of Emotional Logic: Love, Greed, Lust...etc.
Knowledge Logic:
This Logic works entirely on existing information/knowledge of a particular subject. Examples: doctor who gave medical advice, lawyers who gave legal advice…etc.
Logical Logic (Common Sense):
This Logic needs no explanation.
System Logic:
This Logic is defined as the logic which is entirely made up of/constitutes of “laws” or “rules”. The person who sets the “laws” is entirely responsible for any misfortunes/misgivings/mishaps that arise from abiding of the “laws”. Examples of places which this logic applies; legal courts, sports events, competition events, lottery draws…etc.
Warp Logic:
This Logic is defined as “when nature of the action (partial or entire) is not in line or contradicts with intention”. Example: you gave a gift of wine to your enemy at the office and unknown to your enemy, the wine is laced with laxative by you. Gift-giving is to bring goodwill but your intention is to cause hurt to your enemy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commentary on the Logics: Arrange all the 5 Logics in alphabetical order and the Logic on top is the most powerful which is Emotional Logic. Therefore, Warp Logic is the lowest and weakest form of Logic. Logical Logic can easily defeat System Logic as in times, people have known to mend laws/rules to their own advantage by using loopholes in the “laws”. Knowledge Logic is quite similar to System Logic, except that “rules” in Knowledge Logic is derived from facts whereas “rules” in System Logic is entirely based on fairness.
Application of the Logics:
Instead of writing “Strictly wait for me to return then do this”, you can write “Wait for me to return then do this. SYS LOG” but you will undertake all responsibilities of the person who obeyed your “rule”. This also means that the person will wait for you until you return but if you fail to return, the person would be waiting for you eternally...
Hence, you should include a time-frame, “Wait for me to return then do this. If I do not return after 15 Feb, then do plan B. SYS LOG” or you can put it as Logical Logic, “Wait for me to return then do this. LOG LOG”. Logical Logic allows the person to make interventions or his own actions in view of the situation.
The full article is very long... when got time, I edit to summarise it for everyone's reading. ^_^